7Hells
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,702
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
bah! I dont think you are giving Glovers abilities enough creditStorminNorman said:Since when was Crispin Glover cast?

bah! I dont think you are giving Glovers abilities enough creditStorminNorman said:Since when was Crispin Glover cast?
regwec said:It's hugely overrated. Unimaginative teenage boys profess to like it because it glorifies violence in a particularly psuedo-artistic fashion.
I fear that this film is very much on the wrong track. The principle villain is to be played by a mediocre actor with no understanding of his role.
7Hells said:bah! I dont think you are giving Glovers abilities enough credit![]()
Your initial comment sounded like you deserved the patronizing. This one is better, but I still disagree. I think ultraviolence can be satyrised yes and I think it does a great job of underlining its deplorability through irony, and I happen to find the "glib" message intriguing, and I felt the moral equivalence, or at least that it puts its morality into a gray area, which I feel was the intention.regwec said:You have no understanding of my post. I understand perfectly that issues integral to Burgess' novel- anarchy/freewill vs. authoritarianism. I think that it is a fairly glib "message", and one that was further dilluted in the film, which I think was among Kubrick's weakest. Furthermore, I do not accept your assertion that ultra violence can be succesfully "satyrised", nor do I think the film even attempts that. What you get is a muddled "sillification" of heinous acts, which does nothing to underline their deplorability. In short, I don't think the film succeeds in constructing a palpable sense of moral equivalence, which seems to be its lynchpin, if I recall rightly.
Look, I just don't like it. I tend to think that the film has a following purely because of its contrived controversy, its design, and the prestige of its dierector. You may think me wrong, but please don't attempt to patronise me.
Darknightnomis said:Clockwork Orange was originally rated 'X' in America and it was moreso for the depiction of a sadistic violence teen culture than the nudity.
Source: http://www.christophernolan.net/biography.phpInspirations
"I've always loved films. I started making films when I was seven years old and I haven't stopped. I never really thought about doing anything else. What I love are films that create their own particular geography, a particular world and emerse you in it for a couple of hours.
"I have always been a huge fan of Ridley Scott and certainly when I was a kid. Alien, Blade Runner just blew me away because they created these extraodinary worlds that were just completely emersive. I was also an enormous Stanley Kubrick fan for similar reasons.
"And as I got older I got more interested in films that I had not grown up with - sort cinema people like Nicolas Roeg, Syney Lumet and John Frankenheimer."
http://www.wizarduniverse.com/movies/batmanbegins/000434765.cfmPosted June 29, 2005
16 Sequel potential
As the credits roll, you will want to see the next one right then. Trust us—you will cheer.
Now let’s rev up that Batmobile and find that Schumacher guy. He should see this flick “Clockwork Orange”-style.
Then it really boils down to a matter of taste. I tend to lump Orange, perhaps unfairly, with films like Man Bites Dog and Irreversable; films that have an embryo of an involving idea, but obscure it with too much physicality. I am dimly aware that Orange is not as violent as I remember it- I saw it when very young, and when very violent films were not commonplace. I do not think it is unfair of me not to want to see it again.ultimatefan said:Your initial comment sounded like you deserved the patronizing. This one is better, but I still disagree. I think ultraviolence can be satyrised yes and I think it does a great job of underlining its deplorability through irony, and I happen to find the "glib" message intriguing, and I felt the moral equivalence, or at least that it puts its morality into a gray area, which I feel was the intention.
Regardless of that, Ledger´s comment felt more in the sense of making the Joker someone sadistic, who doesn´t care about society´s rules, which is very true of The Joker.
explode7 said:So why didn't it make as much as spiderman???
The Sage said:Can someone give a brief summary of what Clockwork Orange is about? Because...I don't know, LOL.
Cinemaman said:As for my mind, if they make TDK as more like thriller with less action, then I will be disappointed just like a great number of fans
Joker should look like he was in comics, BUT with some changes in the details (to make him a bit more believeable and also fit in Nolan's vision).
But there should be as much action as it was in BB, and this time I want to see real fight (though I liked some quick shots in fights from BB).
![]()
StorminNorman said:I don't see why it cant be a thriller full of action. The story should be more of a thriller story, less big action scenes (like Superman Returns style action scenes) and more story based.
Cinemaman said:Agreed, but I'd like to see BB's quanity of action scenes.
ChrisBaleBatman said:Well, it IS Batman.....there needs to be showdown between him and the Joker at the end.
I mean, we've got to face facts.....Batman needs to have atleast SOME Blockbuster aspects to it. Things that will get OTHER people excited. If they were making the movie JUST for us Bat-fans.....they wouldn't expect to the movie to make that much money b/c you catering to one crowd.
They've just got to find a balance. And, I'm sure they will. They did before.
StorminNorman said:Sure, however I wish they wouldn't of gone for the normal Summer Blockbuster final showdown thing they did with Begins. If they would of kept it lower key, it would of been perfect.
ChrisBaleBatman said:Well, it IS Batman.....there needs to be showdown between him and the Joker at the end.
I mean, we've got to face facts.....Batman needs to have atleast SOME Blockbuster aspects to it. Things that will get OTHER people excited. If they were making the movie JUST for us Bat-fans.....they wouldn't expect to the movie to make that much money b/c you catering to one crowd.
They've just got to find a balance. And, I'm sure they will. They did before.
Sweet little viddy. Colors don't look really unless you viddy them.Superman4ever said:Guys actin' a fool!
![]()
Like Bachlor Party but with killing and stuff! It's coming in from Blockbuster on Monday so I'll tell you then.![]()