This is cliche to say, but I still think the best Joker characterization is Ledger's in TDK
I have to agree. Of all the interpretations of The Joker, I enjoyed Heath's the most. It's not cliche to say, his part was well written and well acted, what's there not to like about it? He did a good job.
I like DKR's Joker, TAS Joker, Azzerallo/Bermejo's Joker, Nicholson's Joker and Bolland's/Moore's Joker. They are all great representations of the character, but I personally found Heath's the best. He had great balance. He was interesting, creepy, funny, strange, ackward, disgusting, hilarious...he had the mix.
Yeah, which is great, except he didn't feel at all like an insane clown. Just some mob gangster. Where the hell is the purple coat? He didn't even dress like the Joker.
I also see what you are saying and agree to a certian point. I felt his outfit was just fine, but you are right in saying he was just a mob gangster. He was just a dirty, scumbag, rude, jerk with clown make-up (which was an interesting take) but that is not Joker. The Joker is known as the Joker for a reason. He is humerous, he messes with you, and is entertaining when he does it.
So I can see where everyone is coming from on this arguement. Both sides have valid points. Joker would be a messed up bastard not to mess with in real life.
But that doesn't matter, because in this book he is shown drinking, poppin pills, raping girls. He just seemed like a bad guy. He didn't seem like The Joker.
--dk7