Chip Chipperson
the big guy
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2013
- Messages
- 22,696
- Reaction score
- 13,930
- Points
- 103
Very close between Spider-Man 2 and Logan but I gotta support my fellow raimi bros on this one and give the edge to the granddaddy of em all
I get a lot of joy out of Logan. It is a really well told story, which so much character and heart, that I can't help but enjoy it. Also it has a lot of fun and funny moments, a lot like TDK. I have already seen it at least 10 times, and I really enjoy it every time.
I do find it strange that a lot of people here treat it like it's Schindler's List. Like, it ain't that dark or devoid of fun.
IMO TDK is really only going to become relevant when comparing against similar style films of similar quality. ie Godfather 1 and 2 and Goodfellas.yeah at this point you might as well just retire TDK and let the debate become "What is the 2nd best" instead. These get old and predictable pretty fast when TDK is involved... and understandably so lol.
IMO TDK is really only going to become relevant when comparing against similar style films of similar quality. ie Godfather 1 and 2 and Goodfellas.
I'm all for subjectivity in evaluating film, so I'm not knocking any opinions, but I think a script needs to make a lot more sense if its film is to be compared to films like The Godfather. For example, a good deal of the Joker's plans don't really make sense that he could pull them off, at least not in that serious setting. I don't have any such fundamental criticisms against The Godfather.
That is because it is not a problem. The wall sequence is James Bond sci-fi for sure, but the logic behind it makes sense. The idea is the bullet is untraceable, but by reconstructing the bullet, there is potential to find a fingerprint. We are talking about a guy who drives around on the streets in a sci-fi tank, and a bit of CSI is the part that is hard to believe?This past weekend I watched TDKT in it's entirety and was surprised how much more I enjoyed BB overall than TDK.
The whole bullet in the wall sequence is convoluted nonsense, and so is the parade portion where Gordon fakes his own death, topped off by an entire firing squad of policemen somehow not recognizing a strange officer with giant facial scars that matched the Joker perfectly.
That last bit is unfathomably dumb. I had forgotten that it cuts to him just chilling in the crowd of officers as if no one would notice.
That entire portion of the movie does not hold up and should have been cut. I struggle to think of another superhero movie I love that is so acclaimed that has such a glaring problem. I get why the movie is so lauded and it's definitely one of the best sin the genre, but naming it alongside some of the best films ever made is a huge stretch.
Hey, there's precedence for Gotham's police being the least competent police force in the world! When Nicholson's Joker had those mimes shoot up city hall they just kind of stood there.
Well I suggest watching the news. Plenty of utterly incompetent cops, especially in big cities. In the case of Gotham, the vast majority are also on the take.I don't really remember the first Burton Batman anymore so I can't say how it works there, but TDK takes a very serious and down to earth take on Batman so having the cops be utterly incompetent just doesn't mesh with the tone at all in my view.
The post above this gives one example. Why would the police be looking just for a man with makeup on? Standard procedure for searching for wanted criminals is to expect hair to be removed or grown, etc, so why wouldn't they expect him to wash off makeup? To focus mainly on that is as dumb as if a western sheriff was looking for people with scarfs over their faces. Everyone knows the Joker has huge facial scars and that would be the obvious main signalment, and given how hard that is to cover up he should be easier than most to spot. Or as someone on the forum said elsewhere, the bank robbery escape is more like an idea from the old TV show.
TDK is full of things I'd be more OK with in a film that isn't so gritty and serious, and that takes itself less seriously, but in that tone I think stand out in a bad way. If Nolan had embraced the CBM genre instead of almost trying to avoid it I think it would have worked better. Or if they just wrote a script as coherent and logical as your standard good crime film.
Well I suggest watching the news. Plenty of utterly incompetent cops, especially in big cities. In the case of Gotham, the vast majority are also on the take.
They wouldn't be simply looking for a man with makeup, but it would the most obvious identifying thing. None of them have seen him with the makeup and the idea that they would spot him in a crowd that has scattered in chaos seems... well not all that down to earth.
And yeah, TDK has a rather fantastic script. This scene included. Nolan also very much embraced the CBM genre. I don't understand the idea that he didn't. Just look at his villains, his tech, etc. It's very comic book. He just did it so much better then everyone else.
Which is established in Begins and TDK. It's one of the major reasons Batman exist. The cops in Gotham aren't very effective, do in no small part to fighting crime in Gotham not really being a thing while under mob rule. Most were crooked, and the good cops could do nothing, for fear of what doing something would result in. It's why Gordon's unit is so small, and even then there is a dirty cop in the group.If a real city had a police force like Gotham's no crimes would be solved. If you can't even piece together a bus sized hole in a bank with a school bus slowly crawling away, covered in dust and debris, you can't solve any crime. As said, it's more like something from the campy TV show.
No, the most obvious identifying thing is his scars. And it's not in the chaos that they should have noticed him, it's before as a highly facially disfigured person stands out a lot. That's way down the list of things he shouldn't have been able to get away with though.
I disagree on the script. It has very good parts but also downright poor parts, with the villain not actually being intelligent but rather having plot armor. It is probably the dumbest film I've ever seen heralded as smart by a good amount of people.
Which is established in Begins and TDK. It's one of the major reasons Batman exist. The cops in Gotham aren't very effective, do in no small part to fighting crime in Gotham not really being a thing while under mob rule. Most were crooked, and the good cops could do nothing, for fear of what doing something would result in. It's why Gordon's unit is so small, and even then there is a dirty cop in the group.
Though your argument over the cops is interesting, as you complain that the movie did not "embrace" comic book sensibilities enough.
How so? Like he has his scars, but he highlights them in red. They are flesh colored after all. Who would have saw the Joker? The other cops? Which ones?
The script is terrific and the Joker is plenty intelligent. He's also crazy though, so he tries insane things. Kind of his thing, as the Joker. Very comic booky, wouldn't you say?
I'm all for subjectivity in evaluating film, so I'm not knocking any opinions, but I think a script needs to make a lot more sense if its film is to be compared to films like The Godfather. For example, a good deal of the Joker's plans don't really make sense that he could pull them off, at least not in that serious setting. I don't have any such fundamental criticisms against The Godfather.
The mob rule matters because the cops are not really cops. They aren't use to being cops. More over, they do not expect the Joker, no one does. Everything he does is audacious, to the point of just simply not expecting. I love the idea that people just think the cops would assume a bus in a group of other buses would just house this bank robber. Everything the Joker does is so out of left field, it takes time to process, and by the time they do it, he's already gone. So what you have are less then stellar cops running into the Joker, in all his ethereal glory.They went overboard with how incompetent they are for the tone of the film. The mob rule doesn't really matter as the first example of extreme incompetence is when the mob bank got robbed.
Yes, if the film had felt more comic booky and taken itself less seriously there would be more room for wacky stuff. It's not something that manages to set the general tone, it just falls outside of it.
The scars are very large and visible, which the clip above clearly shows. They are scars that have healed horribly bad and he looks disfigured. And he's clearly walked around plenty of other cops that are supposed to be very on edge and observant at that place (plenty of shots to see how paranoid many look).
He has plenty of plans that aren't within his power to control. For example, rigging an entire hospital with explosives enough to destroy it without anyone noticing is nothing he'd ever be able to do, which is probably why they don't explain it whatsoever and just hope that the audience doesn't think. I don't think the film manages to marry the wacky stuff with the tone, so instead of feeling comic booky I think they created a film that tries to be serious but doesn't always stay on the road. An example that I manages to walk this line far better with a serious tone is Logan.
The mob rule matters because the cops are not really cops. They aren't use to being cops. More over, they do not expect the Joker, no one does. Everything he does is audacious, to the point of just simply not expecting. I love the idea that people just think the cops would assume a bus in a group of other buses would just house this bank robber. Everything the Joker does is so out of left field, it takes time to process, and by the time they do it, he's already gone. So what you have are less then stellar cops running into the Joker, in all his ethereal glory.
Yes. And which of these cops, standing a reasonable distance away, would think the Joker is standing in the 21 gun salute line? In your example of a grounded reality, why would they expect something that crazy? That he would be able to take out 6-7 cops, take their uniforms and dress up with his crew, and get into the 21 gun salute?
The Joker filled up two buildings with explosive rather quickly for both Harvey and Rachel. Him rigging a hospital, while the cops are scattered across the town is strange how?. Also, he clearly has men with him. He doesn't drive the bus away, he doesn't control everyone on the bus on his own, he has goons with him when Batman attacks. He didn't magically do it on his own.
You are writing that comic booky and serious are not compatible. That isn't true at all.
They are in cop cars. They can't see the roof of the bus. But even still, they don't even know there is a hole in the side of the bank and that a bus was driven into the bank. So by the time they all get there and figure it out, guess what. He's gone.I find the idea amusing that the cops wouldn't make that connection. They are approaching a bank robbery, a very serious and dangerous situation and they will of course be vigilant to notice any escape attempt. One of the buses in the line is covered in dust and some debris, while all others are fine. There's no valid reason why that wouldn't attract attention. They also have good time to assess the situation and then basically run up to the bus as it was just crawling away.
The cops likely know a good amount of the other cops so they'd know who were standing in that salute. Just seeing all new faces would be odd enough, let alone a disfigured one when they are looking for a disfigured criminal as their most wanted. But as said, it's not on the top of my list of things I don't think he would be able to do.
The issue with rigging the bombs isn't the cops, it's all the other people in hospitals.
It's common to use comic booky in the sense of embracing the more stand out aspects of comic books, so I thought it would be easy to be understood with that term on this forum. The MCU has also become more comic booky now than in it's first films (although starting out with a scientific breakthrough in a cave isn't exactly bottom of the scale).
Honestly, the only thing I can look at with TDK being any type of major flaw (outside of some bad extras here and there) is the Joker seriously dwarfs Batman in regards to who is the most interesting character. I do find both Joker and Dent more interesting than Batman in TDK. But that said, I still love Batman in it so it is a minor problem.
I find it an issue if the overwhelming presence isn't amazing. Vader and the Joker dominate because of just how great they are, not simply because the other characters are underwritten or just suck.It reminds me of Star Wars in that regard where Vader dominates the other characters. It is pretty common where the villain is the juiciest part.
The film that I think really does suffer from it is Silence of the Lambs, where Lector is a just a supporting character and not even the main villain.