Indy Flash
Archeological Speedster
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,968
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Cool....
![]()
Too cool.
Cool....
![]()
I wouldn't be surprised if Mark is intentionally underselling the movie just to keep expectations in check.
There really is something to be said about expectation levels, in general. I'm not saying it's true for the PT, but hype levels can kill something if it's merely good or great and not the rapture, as Mark said.
t:Curious, for fans of the character...did you guys ever feel like, while watching the OT, the only (if not, the biggest) reason why Luke was able to come out top at the end of it was mainly because of him being Vader's son, thus being afforded the luxury that every else (that had gone against Vader in the past) didn't have?
Or did you guys feel that Luke rightfully earned his place as being the hero of the OT, regardless of his connection to Vader?
Without hindsight, he absolutely did, even with it. Luke was most definitely his own man. Despite him knowing his father was a Jedi, it was really his choice and dedication to wanting to become a Jedi. If anything, Vader as his father makes it even harder for him. With or without the knowledge. He has a lot on his shoulders, and the internal struggle of even becoming like his father was more of a danger. It was the reconciliation of becoming his father or not being his father, yet he was still always his father's son. But at the end of the day, he earned his place by his own decisions. He did not succumb to the same temptations of the dark side. Even when he was lied to, he still didn't do anything awful.
You have to give credit to the Owen and Bury Lars for raising him. I think this is the main source of his humanity. Similar as to how the Kent's raised Kal El. The morals and values they instilled in him made him the man he was. Luke came from a a very different upbringing despite being on the same planet. If it wasn't for them, it is entirely possibly Luke might have turned out the same way as his father. Even Owen for seeing the absolute necessity for Luke to not become like him, hence perhaps him always wanting to delay Luke leaving the homestead. It was always for the best of him, and it's possible later on, Luke realized that and appreciated it even more, perhaps humbling him.
Vader's comment in ROTJ about "it's too late for me" was interesting. I kind of took it to mean that he DID realize that what he was doing was wrong on some level, but considered himself to be too "far gone" by that point to really change. Obi Wan and Yoda thought the same thing. Luke's greatness was in his recognizing that that WASN'T the case, and being able to finally convince his father that it was too late to reform/redeem himself. Also, Luke was able to resist both Sheev's attempts to corrupt him AND Yoda/Obi Wan's desire for him to simply kill Vader, and forge his own path that was better than both.
I remember Luke as the guy who cause the end of the Empire. Problem is if they're continuing the Empire as if Luke accomplished nothing at the end of ROTJ.
First of all, great posts by everyone that responded to the question that I had previously posted.
I was wondering if a few posters here could help me settle a debate that my friend and I have had regarding Luke's victory over Vader at the end of their duel in "ROTJ".
In your guys's opinion, was Luke able to beat Vader in their lightsaber duel as a result of him having the required skills by then (well that, along with tapping into the Dark Side for a bit)? Or was he just lucky because of the fact that Vader was actually going easy on him when it came to their lightsaber duel?