DarthSkywalker
🦉Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 132,819
- Reaction score
- 80,347
- Points
- 203
Just show the people Batman punching Superman. Everyone will be there. 

Last edited:
And then had an incredible harsh drop. Which probably had something to do with the terrible, terrible reviews it got.
Its that latter thing that bodes really ill for its sequel. A really good movie gets people excited to go out and see its sequel. . . while a bad movie keeps people away.
WB/DC will flinch and move. Count on it.
I love how you emphasize the terrible reviews, when the reaction was actually mixed.
My favorite superhero is Batman, but there is no denying Captain America would win this. Marvel has a much better track record right now, and they'll be riding more hype after A:AOU. The mix reaction to MOS, the negative reaction to Batfleck from the GA...I think it will do very well, but it's not going to make more money than Cap 3.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/superman_man_of_steel/
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/man-of-steel
Apparently your idea of "mixed reviews" is "half the reviewers don't hate the movie". If half the reviewers hate the movie, you have failed, its just a question of how badly you've failed.
^Two wrongs don't make a right.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/superman_man_of_steel/
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/man-of-steel
Apparently your idea of "mixed reviews" is "half the reviewers don't hate the movie". If half the reviewers hate the movie, you have failed, its just a question of how badly you've failed.
The longer this game of chicken goes on, the more available release dates dry up.
Marvel should just move to April.
Next time Warner Bros has a juicy release date, Marvel will have every right to steal it away.
I love how you emphasize the terrible reviews, when the reaction was actually mixed. That did play a role, but MOS mainly suffered due to World War Z and Monsters University opening the following weekend. MOS lost an extra $20M-$30M (likely more) it would've gained had June not been so packed.
And the amount of articles pointing out how CA:TWS is 'superior' to MOS, in regards to climaxes, have me bewildered. It's tactless drawing parallels between Bucky and Zod, when the two characters are completely different in terms of motivation and circumstances. (Not to mention that Zod was killed by Superman's hands way before MOS came along.) And having the audacity to point out the 'senseless' destruction in MOS while people ignore it in CA:TWS reeks of fanboy hypocrisy.
If anything the climax of CA:TWS should have MOS critics revisit that film, and maybe get a better understanding of why that climax ended like it did. The only parallel between TWS and MOS is that the main characters are forced to make questionable decisions. It's annoying that fanboys give Steve a pass for doing similar things in TWS, and yet criticize Clark for doing it in MOS.
Difference is WB won't publicly announce 'Untitled Movie' as occupying a release date. I guarantee you WB wouldn't have moved in if Marvel actually announced what the film was.
It was known to be a phase 3 film.
What difference does it make if it is cap 3 as opposed to iron man 4 or ms marvel?
Point is marvel was going to release a phase 3 film on that date, with the announcement to be made in a manner that maximizes publicity.
untitled is untitled. Marvel can not claim a date because they are The Marve Studious.
So? Just because it's Marvel doesn't give them the right to automatically claim that date if they've got nothing to announce.
Well that's what happens when you fall asleep, the tortoise wins the race.