ThePhantasm
2 sexy 4 a stormtrooper
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 19,335
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
On a meta level, this is kind of true with the way the crowd reacted.
Deadspin said:Though I’d argue Brock Lesnar and Roman Reigns did more in their fake match to beat each other up than either of these guys did to each other tonight.
Hagler and SSR. Those would be the two I think could beat him if all things were even.He's one of the very best defensive technical fighters ever. Maybe the best, at least the best of the ones I've seen (I'm mid 30s). There's noone I've seen in any of his weight classes that I would have any confidence in saying they could beat him. Just has a style that leads to less entertaining fights than some of the other top (even lesser) fighters.
I'd definitely pay to see any of these fights! I've only seen these guys in their big name fights on tape so I don't feel I know them as well as all the boxers I've watched growing up who I've seen in 20+ fights each.Hagler and SSR. Those would be the two I think could beat him if all things were even.
Those potshots were hard enough to keep Manny from wanting to run in.
Yeah Manny's fault he couldn't figure out what to do when an opponent runs, hugs, and pop shots his way to a win.
Good win for Mayweather but from reading other boxing forums and social media, I'm not alone in saying this was a boring weak ass fight.
Hardly the fight of the century, barely qualifies for fight of the week.
I have too many friends who aren't giving Mayweather his due. What we saw last night was not the most exciting fight, yes. The majority of people wanted to see a slobber knocker. A good chunk of people wanted to see Pacquiao knock Mayweather out. That did not happen and people feel cheated. But honestly, people got what they paid for.
Mayweather does what Mayweather does. He will stand his ground and outbox you. He made Pacquiao play to his tune and made him pay for it. He did not run. He did not fight like a coward. What we saw last night was a defensive masterclass. Mayweather may be a piece of s*** outside of the ring. He may portray himself as the villain. He may make it very easy to hate him. The fact of the matter is he is that damn good.
I think a lot of people forget that Mayweather is also not your typical 38-year old boxer at the tail-end of his career. He's a boxer that's prided himself on his defense and elusiveness, which means he's taken far fewer big shots over his career and doesn't have any deficiencies in his movements.
Manny needs to fire some people in his corner team. If he really believed he was winning in the count (and his behavior in later rounds may indicate that he did), he is delusional. His corner team should've been telling him from the 7th or 8th round on, "You're not going to win on the score card, you need to lower your defenses, open yourself up to attack, and basically charge him." Manny needed to throw caution to the wind in those later rounds and go for the knock out and he never did. That is what baffles me. He fought like someone who believed he was ahead on the score card, which makes not a bit of sense.
Manny Pacquiao fan forever.
I thought Manny was going to win considering that he was controlling the fight in almost every round. Mayweather does his usual thing but it didn't look like he was owning the fight unlike his previous fights.
He even hit Manny below the belt.
I'm not referring MayPac fight but to boxing in general. I hope the scoring system should be changed like scores should be revealed every round and "no hugging" policy because it only stops the audience to see a good fight.
I'm not
If you say Mayweather was doing his usual thing then how you say at the same time Manny was controlling the fight in almost every round?
When you land twice the punches and basically dictate when the opponent hits you and you hit them, yes you are controlling the fight. You can't win a fight landing 81 punches.Because Mayweather doing his usual thing was not as good as his previous fights.
Also if let's say Mayweather is doing his usual thing while Manny is also doing his usual thing, then why would people say Mayweather was controlling the
fight?
It's like defensive vs offensive and the defensive is controlling the game/fight?
When you're in defensive mode, you're not controlling the game/fight.
I know table tennis and other sports is not boxing but if I play defensive, I can't say I'm controlling the game unless I play offensive.
I have too many friends who aren't giving Mayweather his due. What we saw last night was not the most exciting fight, yes. The majority of people wanted to see a slobber knocker. A good chunk of people wanted to see Pacquiao knock Mayweather out. That did not happen and people feel cheated. But honestly, people got what they paid for.
Mayweather does what Mayweather does. He will stand his ground and outbox you. He made Pacquiao play to his tune and made him pay for it. He did not run. He did not fight like a coward. What we saw last night was a defensive masterclass. Mayweather may be a piece of s*** outside of the ring. He may portray himself as the villain. He may make it very easy to hate him. The fact of the matter is he is that damn good.
The thing is, Pacquiao didn't do his usual thing, which is his offensive game, because Mayweather was successfully doing his -- playing a defensive game that disrupts his opponent's rhythm and scores points off it.
Mayweather is defensive but he also wants to KO Pacquiao but couldn't as well.
Manny Pacquiao fan forever.
I thought Manny was going to win considering that he was controlling the fight in almost every round. Mayweather does his usual thing but it didn't look like he was owning the fight unlike his previous fights.
He even hit Manny below the belt.
I'm not referring MayPac fight but to boxing in general. I hope the scoring system should be changed like scores should be revealed every round and "no hugging" policy because it only stops the audience to see a good fight.
I'm not