Malus
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 8, 2005
- Messages
- 4,222
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
AVEITWITHJAMON said:Yes but i am also counting people who read the comic books as a child and have since stopped as fans that would go and see it. And there are a lot of them, especially here in England. I'm sure there are quite a few in the U.S as well. And though they can no longer be considered comic book readers, they were once and many of those people went to see the movie.
I said: "A multi-generational presence of fans (as I'm sure was the case) probably made up a very small percentage of moviegoers. Far fewer than Spider-man or Batman, who had/have far more 'face value.'"
Look, let's say the FF comic had 200,000 readers in 1961, and that readership has completely "turned over" every 5 years since then. Now let's say every single one of these readers, past and present, paid to see FF during its run in theaters. We'd be talking about a little under two million people (about 1 million, 800 thousand). Now I'd call that a very generous estimate, as FF hasn't sold anything close to 200,000 since the late-seventies. So- if they all paid full ticket price (say a metropolitan ticket price of $10) that would account for less than 20 million out of, what, 330 million?
And that would be about...7 percent of the total box office.
All I'm saying is that comics readers (past and present) didn't make the FF movie (or any comics-related movie, for that matter) a success.
The general public (of which we constitute far less than 1%) made the movie a success.
Because there truly aren't enough of us to really matter. When you're hanging around the local comic shop, it may feel like there's lots of other comics fans, but if I went into the nearest Best Buy or Red Lobster and took a poll (assuming I wasn't asked to leave

God, I feel lonely now.

