Homecoming Micheal Keaton IS The Vulture

[Bulk]

I do not think that is the direction they're taking the character, at least I hope not.

Yeah, after watching the trailer a few more times, it doesn't really seem to fit with the glimpses of footage or dialogue.

 

[ehh]

Not sure Keaton is interested in doing multiple movies. This is likely his one and done role. Unless there are some secret plans for doing Sinister Six down the line in next decade.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BNulcvpgClB/?taken-by=jnwtts&hl=en

 

[Village_Idiot]

Not sure Keaton is interested in doing multiple movies. This is likely his one and done role. Unless there are some secret plans for doing Sinister Six down the line in next decade.

The thing that has always had me curious about Keaton is , is when the rumors first started coming it was that Keaton was going to play Vulture

Then the rumors started coming out that Keaton was no longer up for the role

and then later yet, the rumors came back that Keaton has been cast as Vulture

So my question is , what changed , did Keaton want to do more movies , did Keaton just want to do the one and done kinda thing , because if that's the case , then that kinda puts the Sinister Six in doubt

Anyways , they changed something to get Keaton to agree to do the part , always just been kinda curious what it was

 

[ehh]

Could have been a simple "I need a bigger paycheck" type of situation.

 

[NinjaTurtleFan]

The thing that has always had me curious about Keaton is , is when the rumors first started coming it was that Keaton was going to play Vulture

Then the rumors started coming out that Keaton was no longer up for the role

and then later yet, the rumors came back that Keaton has been cast as Vulture

So my question is , what changed , did Keaton want to do more movies , did Keaton just want to do the one and done kinda thing , because if that's the case , then that kinda puts the Sinister Six in doubt

Anyways , they changed something to get Keaton to agree to do the part , always just been kinda curious what it was

1. We don't know if he will die or not.

2. If he does or does not die but does not want to return back for the role, they can still do the Sinister Six with Shocker, whoever LMG is playing and we still don't know who Michael Mando is. On top of that, if a sequel has already been greenlit, they can always bring in two more villains and then in the third you bring in another with a team-up of all said villains. BOOM! Sinister Six. (Or wait till the fourth film and BOOM! Sinister Six.)

 

[PeterBenParker]

The thing that has always had me curious about Keaton is , is when the rumors first started coming it was that Keaton was going to play Vulture

Then the rumors started coming out that Keaton was no longer up for the role

and then later yet, the rumors came back that Keaton has been cast as Vulture

So my question is , what changed , did Keaton want to do more movies , did Keaton just want to do the one and done kinda thing , because if that's the case , then that kinda puts the Sinister Six in doubt

Anyways , they changed something to get Keaton to agree to do the part , always just been kinda curious what it was

I think it's a one and done situation myself, and I wouldn't worry about Sinister Six at all. They could very well be adapting Ultimate Six.

I also think he's dying in this film.

 

[Village_Idiot]

Does Marvel sign anyone to just one movie contracts anymore

It's like when you sign with Marvel , you sign for life

Seems like everyone you hear about has been signed to like 12 movie deals.................lol

If Marvel has plans for the future of Vulture , they wouldn't have signed Keaton for just one movie , or anyone else

 

[Village_Idiot]

1. We don't know if he will die or not.

2. If he does or does not die but does not want to return back for the role, they can still do the Sinister Six with Shocker, whoever LMG is playing and we still don't know who Michael Mando is. On top of that, if a sequel has already been greenlit, they can always bring in two more villains and then in the third you bring in another with a team-up of all said villains. BOOM! Sinister Six. (Or wait till the fourth film and BOOM! Sinister Six.)

Yea , the Sinister Six can be pretty interchangeable

But if it doesn't have both Doc Ock and Vulture , I'd just as soon they forget about it all together

 

[ehh]

In other words, nobody here actually knows about what is going on with Keaton's contract.

 

[ItchyWebShooter]

Given Vulture's design, I'd say another armored-suit Goblin is highly possible. I think the best way to adapt Goblin's suit in tech-form is to mimic the classic design's silhouette. Like for example, this:

I feel has the right vibe. The helmet has the shape of the hood, It has the classic tunic shape complete with loin-cloth esque skirt around the waist. If it was purple & black with exposed arms/face and a hologram Goblin mask/skin (like what Widow was wearing in TWS) I could see it working really well.

Please God no.

That glider looks like a flying rubbish heap.

The overall design there I am just not a fan of at all. The original movie Green Goblin was practical but very comic-booky at the same time. I want comic-booky in my comic book movies.

(Vulture definitely falls under that category).

I'd rather this:

Spoiler

Or even this:

Spoiler

The first one, we'd never get, but it's so sexy.

Well, really, that would be appropriate. A lot of Spider-man villains are basically "A heist movie character gets superpowers, continues robbing banks". And while people complain about the unrealism of supervillains robbing banks. . . its not really that different from how stupid bank robbery is in real life. Gaining superpowers or supertech isn't going to fix the personality and character defects that make one think knocking over banks is going to produce good results.

Basically, just like Peter is an ordinary kid who gets power, and after some fumbles decides to try and use it for good, many of his villains should be ordinary guys who get power, and make the other choice, and do it in just as flawed a manner.

Don't know what people seem to fail to understand about this.

Keaton can hit a home run off a knuckleball. He took a ridiculous role in The Other Guys and made it into something subversively brilliant, and elevated the whole movie along with it. I hope he doesn't get killed, because he could really be the Tony Stark for the MCU villains.

I love The Other Guys. Keaton did some brilliant work in it.

I'd love to see him in future films, really. Even just cameos.

 

[Loki882]

Does Marvel sign anyone to just one movie contracts anymore

It's like when you sign with Marvel , you sign for life

Seems like everyone you hear about has been signed to like 12 movie deals.................lol

If Marvel has plans for the future of Vulture , they wouldn't have signed Keaton for just one movie , or anyone else

Depends on the actor. Like some of the villain actors might have one and done deals. Robert Redford, Corey Stoll, Jeff Bridges, etc. Or Marvel just might not bring them back for whatever reason (for example, Tim Roth has mentioned that he has a multi-film deal to play Abomination and is interested in returning, and yet we've gotten no hint of him coming back in almost a decade now).

 

[ThePhilosopher]

I'm super excited for Micheal Keaton. He is an amazing actor who can really play scary villains. I really hope he won't be a one-off and they are bringing him back for a future spider-man movie featuring the sinister six.

 

[matt47]

Goblin is one of the hardest designs to bring to live action imo. Well, hardest to not look cheesy.

 

[Spider-Aziz]

I agree with the lot who said Keaton Vulture looks like he's going to be the best MCU villain since Loki, I hope he delivers.

 

[harryoscop]

Please God no.

That glider looks like a flying rubbish heap.

The overall design there I am just not a fan of at all. The original movie Green Goblin was practical but very comic-booky at the same time. I want comic-booky in my comic book movies.

(Vulture definitely falls under that category).





The first one, we'd never get, but it's so sexy.





Don't know what people seem to fail to understand about this.



I love The Other Guys. Keaton did some brilliant work in it.

I'd love to see him in future films, really. Even just cameos.

Ehh, I'm not sure I'd call this Vulture comic-booky. He has elements of the classic suit for sure but it's definitively leaning closer to the grounded, more realistic side of things. I imagine this sort of trend will continue with villains who have over-the-top costumes. But given the past two failed Goblin costumes, I'd imagine Marvel wants to get him right but fit within the MCU perimeters. Tech that mimics classic design:

Spoiler

 

[ThePhilosopher]

Ehh, I'm not sure I'd call this Vulture comic-booky. He has elements of the classic suit for sure but it's definitively leaning closer to the grounded, more realistic side of things. I imagine this sort of trend will continue with villains who have over-the-top costumes. But given the past two failed Goblin costumes, I'd imagine Marvel wants to get him right but fit within the MCU perimeters. Tech that mimics classic design:

Will we even get a Green Goblin though? We've seen the green goblin on screen for 2-3 times already. I'd say they can make easily make 3-4 great spider-man movies, without even touching on the villains that have come before. It would seem like a safe bet.

 

[Web-Head]

Will we even get a Green Goblin though? We've seen the green goblin on screen for 2-3 times already. I'd say they can make easily make 3-4 great spider-man movies, without even touching on the villains that have come before. It would seem like a safe bet.

That's the thing, depending on how many they make, I don't see Goblin showing up until the 5th or 6th movie. Introduce Norman in the 3rd or 4th one and have a slow build up to him becoming the goblin.

 

[harryoscop]

Will we even get a Green Goblin though? We've seen the green goblin on screen for 2-3 times already. I'd say they can make easily make 3-4 great spider-man movies, without even touching on the villains that have come before. It would seem like a safe bet.

I certainly hope we do. There's still a lot of untapped potential for many of the villains that have been done before, and there is only so long that they can hold off on Spidey's arch-enemy a-list villains. I would like either Ock, Gobbie or Venom for number 3 to cap off the trilogy.

 

[Web-Head]

I certainly hope we do. There's still a lot of untapped potential for many of the villains that have been done before, and there is only so long that they can hold off on Spidey's arch-enemy a-list villains. I would like either Ock, Gobbie or Venom for number 3 to cap off the trilogy.

I say Ock

 

[OutOfBoose]

We had Green Goblin two times. Maybe it's time for Hobgoblin?

 

[Spider-Aziz]

We had Green Goblin two times. Maybe it's time for Hobgoblin?

We had Norman in the suit once only, and he was more like the 90s cartoon version than the old comics version.
At least the movies didn't have Kingpin, I'd hate to see the 90s cartoon version of that character on film.

 

[ehh]

We had only one true Norman Osborn Green Goblin as the main villain of a Spider-Man movie (SM1). I do not count Harry Osborn in SM3. Harry becomes a Goblin at the end of TASM2 for about 5 minutes. The end.

If people are okay with seeing more Joker, especially after the arguably unbeatable Heath Ledger performance in TDK, people should be fine with seeing another Norman Osborn/Green Goblin take.

 

[OutOfBoose]

TASM2 Goblin sucked beyond belief. I'm certainly not against another Green Goblin. But I kinda feel the next villain won't be a flying one. Unless they introduce more than one.

 

[Web-Head]

TASM2 Goblin sucked beyond belief. I'm certainly not against another Green Goblin. But I kinda feel the next villain won't be a flying one. Unless they introduce more than one.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the next villain will be Mysterio or Scorpion

 

[OutOfBoose]

Why them exactly?