Mission: Impossible 3

I wish for once the CPR would just f**king actually work like it should for once. Or they at least start with the damn pounding.
 
No it was the Hanzo foundation dedication in the credits.

The other stuff is just Abrams rehashing and ripping himself off.
 
anyway, just came back from watching it. I really liked it, it was pretty f***in cool, but I liked the first one better.

the twists were WAAAAAY obvious... I mean, they practically gave it up when
Musgrave helped Ethan escape. I mean, why would Brassell, if he was supposed to be in Davian's pocket, keep Ethan arrested, when he'd know Ethan had to retrieve the Rabbit's Feet?

which was a shame, because that bit wasn't even necessary, seeing as how Ethan, superagent that he is could've easily
found a way to escape on his own
. True, it'd be farfetched, but then the MI movies aren't exactly known for extreme realism...
 
Threshold said:
Yeah, that played out nearly identically to Charlies run-in on Lost.

heh, after that scene I actually pictured Jack and Charlie kissing after... :D

:(
 
JackBauer said:
anyway, just came back from watching it. I really liked it, it was pretty f***in cool, but I liked the first one better.

the twists were WAAAAAY obvious... I mean, they practically gave it up when
Musgrave helped Ethan escape. I mean, why would Brassell, if he was supposed to be in Davian's pocket, keep Ethan arrested, when he'd know Ethan had to retrieve the Rabbit's Feet?

Yeah I agree. Though I had Musgrave pegged as soon as he appeared. The first movie had a much better plot IMHO.
 
TheVileOne said:
Yeah I agree. Though I had Musgrave pegged as soon as he appeared. The first movie had a much better plot IMHO.

It had a more complex and intriguing plot, but Mi3 is a more entertaining film, IMO.
 
TheVileOne said:
Yeah I agree. Though I had Musgrave pegged as soon as he appeared. The first movie had a much better plot IMHO.

yeah, you can always tell that
the ******* isn't going to be the double agent.
it's like a rule or something...
 
I felt that the movie needed more Seymour Hoffman, his scenes kicked ass when he was onscreen. Unfortunatly there wasnt enough of his badassness, he was very underutilized.
 
one thing this movie did manage to do great, though, is actually make me care about Ethan. mostly because of Julia, and mostly because of Monaghan. yeah, I'm shallow, I know. :D
 
cyborg ninja 14 said:
I felt that the movie needed more Seymour Hoffman, his scenes kicked ass when he was onscreen. Unfortunatly there wasnt enough of his badassness, he was very underutilized.

he did steal the movie... :up:
 
I love how he wakes up and immediately just starts telling Ethan what he's going to do.
 
JackBauer said:
heh, after that scene I actually pictured Jack and Charlie kissing after... :D

:(

Speaking of Jack aka Matthew Fox, I honestly felt that he would've cured the movie of the problems I had with it if he'd have been in Tom Cruise's role. He has a good emotional and comedic range for that part.
 
cmill216 said:
Hoffan's
death
was sweet as hell! :up:

Hell yeah it was, the audience cheered and clapped when that occured.
 
Threshold said:
Speaking of Jack aka Matthew Fox, I honestly felt that he would've cured the movie of the problems I had with it if he'd have been in Tom Cruise's role. He has a good emotional and comedic range for that part.

I didn't think Cruise was a "problem" at all for me. I put his offscreen shiznit to the side. Yes, he's a wack job in real life, but onscreen I like Tom.
 
Threshold said:
Hell yeah it was, the audience cheered and clapped when that occured.

Same here. People were behind Cruise/Ethan all the way, no matter how bada$$ Hoffman was.
 
Threshold said:
Speaking of Jack aka Matthew Fox, I honestly felt that he would've cured the movie of the problems I had with it if he'd have been in Tom Cruise's role. He has a good emotional and comedic range for that part.

So the hardcore Lost fans would approve of Matthew Fox running around kicking ass even though his character in that show is reluctant to such acts?
 
cmill216 said:
I didn't think Cruise was a "problem" at all for me. I put his offscreen shiznit to the side. Yes, he's a wack job in real life, but onscreen I like Tom.

He did a terrific job as Hunt in this installment (aside from the early romance scenes), but I found myself bored by watching him, it was just a natural feeling from his overexposure. I actually chuckled when I saw him in
priest get-up
because I bet he had to do like eight weeks of alien spirit worshiping to make up for it. I have too much knowledge about him that it takes me out of the movie when I see stuff like that, regardless of how I felt before going into the movie.
 
cyborg ninja 14 said:
So the hardcore Lost fans would approve of Matthew Fox running around kicking ass even though his character in that show is reluctant to such acts?

hahaha, no, I meant if Matthew Fox was in the lead, not Jack getting off the island and joining the IMF.
 
Threshold said:
He did a terrific job as Hunt in this installment (aside from the early romance scenes), but I found myself bored by watching him, it was just a natural feeling from his overexposure. I actually chuckled when I saw him in
priest get-up
because I bet he had to do like eight weeks of alien spirit worshiping to make up for it. I have too much knowledge about him that it takes me out of the movie when I see stuff like that, regardless of how I felt before going into the movie.

Fair enough. I can see how people feel that way. I guess I'm just a...forgiving person. ;)
 
Is MI: III more faithful to the television series?

If it is...maybe i'll give it a shot.

:confused:
 
LostSon88 said:
Is MI: III more faithful to the television series?

If it is...maybe i'll give it a shot.

:confused:
If the televisions series you are thinking of is Alias? Yes.

If its the Mission Impossible series? No.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"