redhawk23
Wrestlin'
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 17,137
- Reaction score
- 293
- Points
- 73
LOOPER.
I have to throw this one out there because I keep seeing people gush over Rian Johnson in the Star Wars forum and how brilliant they think this movie is. No, it really isn't. I've heard Johnson try to dismiss the plot holes in this film by saying something like "We introduce time travel, and then it just 'gets out of the way' so we can tell our story." Ummm, no. That's a cop out. Because your whole story REVOLVES AROUND TIME TRAVEL. You have to at least TRY to make it make sense. To me, the movie jumps the shark when Paul Dano's character fails to kill his future self. Why? Because instead of just KILLING Dano and eliminating the problem, Jeff Daniels' team decides to lure the future version of him back to them by DISMEMBERING the younger version. Tell me, what's the point of that? If you kill Dano, then the problem is solved (and they eventually do anyway, apparently). So there's no point in trying to lure the older version of him back. You could argue that they didn't want to mess with the timeline, but when you cut some guys arms and legs off, you DO alter the course of his life. So what was the point?
Unlike many things this is specifically explained in the film. Even maiming someone is less disruptive to the timeline than completely removing them.
And outside of the film Johnson has in fact talked a lot about how the time travel works, in the film it just wasn't necessary to have Inception style exposition.