Loden Greatstorm
Suko
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2015
- Messages
- 25,169
- Reaction score
- 4,970
- Points
- 103
I told y'all we will see something official just before filming begins.
Then don't adapt a European fantasy series set in a very thinly veiled alternate North/Eastern Europe (which during the medieval era the majority of which was overwhelmingly white). Adapt some other fantasy property that has the racial diversity you want.
The Witcher's uniqueness is in its strong basis in Slavic culture and folklore. Despite being white, eastern Europeans of Slavic background are underrepresented and often negatively portrayed in Hollywood. They are usually portrayed as Russian mobsters, sleezy immigrant con artists, or other stereotypes. Why take the Witcher and its characters away from such a population? We are not talking about the same old white Western Europe Anglo-Saxon medieval fantasy with this property...
No, but there are plenty of Polish-Americans, etc. and many of them are great actors. You can cast them just like African Americans were cast as Wakandans in Black Panther.
Also, the homogeneous nature of medieval society is important to the themes of racism and xenophobia in the Witcher stories as Marvolo explained in depth.
I told y'all we will see something official just before filming begins.
Key word is fantasy. This is a fantasy series that I am guessing doesnt really follow the same real life history. Not to mention having 1 or 2 ethnic characters doesnt break with a majority white cast and probably white background so it still plays within the realms of "reality". And we arent getting Slavic actors so not like this is going to be something authentic for them...not to mention that we have had a Witcher show with native actors in the 90s.
Jews most definitely.
Especially for the 3rd version of Spider-man. I mean the 4th I think definitely should be Miles. And that's not just a diversity thing, after a certain number of attempts it's worth giving a shot to other versions of a character. I guess it was a bit different here as this was the first Spidey in the MCU.I guess the reason it weirds me out is that Hollywood is largely unwilling to open up the central roles to minority actors but they will gender or race flip all the secondary characters instead.
Like I remember when Spider-Man Homecoming came out, all these critics were tripping over themselves to pat themselves on the back for pointing out Homecoming has such a "diverse" supporting cast. Key word is supporting. Spider-Man, the titular hero, is still a white male. Does that really make it better? Wouldn't it be better if the minority roles were made for the actual main central hero?
I mean when you get right down to it, there's absolutely nothing that could've stopped them from using Miles Morales.
Hahaha, close enough!Yeah but it didn't happen when you predicted it would![]()
I haven't really hated anything I've seen yet. I mean I can nitpick Geralt's eyes or his weird looking shirt, but this was only an hair and makeup test.
It's not actual show footage or clips.
Am I crazy about some of the casting? No. But some of the fans who are like "OK show is ruined now. Cancel it already." C'mon now, let's back this up a little.
Chalotra from a physical standpoint appears to be miscast as Yennefer, but I'm willing to give her a chance. She went through the casting and audition process and got the role. So they saw something in her that was right for it.
I'm being a tad dramatic but all my excitement for this has been zapped. Unless there are otherworldly performances from the Yen and Triss actresses I cant help but feel I'll be thinking of what could have been watching them.
"Mr. Sapkowski has said publicly and to me that the continent is big and diverse in its population in every way (race, culture, gender, and yes, occasionally skin color, which he said he did not always specify)."
We have literally seen one costume, book accurate, in shadows, during makeup test. I agree, it does look a little off, like a material could be better, but your reaction seems way too exaggerated to me.At this point it's not even casting, it's awful production values. Everything about it scream cheap, tasteless and uninspired. And Henry C. looks like a miscast.
I call it like I see it. There was camera test for the Joker solo and it looked great. First photo of Bane was also a camera test and it looked great. Geraldo does not look great. Cavill doesn't inspire any confidence either.We have literally seen one costume, book accurate, in shadows, during makeup test. I agree, it does look a little off, like a material could be better, but your reaction seems way too exaggerated to me.
Also, we dont know anything about effects, we have yet to see and judge camera work, sets, grading, you know... Everything that actually encompases the term 'production value'.
But thats the mentality of fandoms, shoot first. It just creates unneeded negativity.
Cant argue that, it looks bad. Like the loose strands seems to be synthetic.Even with superior costume, eyes and more gruff Cavill, that wig is abomination:
![]()
Hey, dont get me wrong, ofc anyone is free to voice their opinion. I just think its still too early to dismiss production value as a whole, thats all.I call it like I see it. There was camera test for the Joker solo and it looked great. First photo of Bane was also a camera test and it looked great. Geraldo does not look great. Cavill doesn't inspire any confidence either.