New FF Set Reports Thread.

The first half of the first film was poorly edited. That bridge sequence made me want to vomit. After they all move into the Baxter building it was excellent IMO. Alot of people complain about Doom but he really wasn't Doom in that film. He just fully changed literally minutes before the ending after turning on The Thing. Then he picked up the mask and robe (or whatever you call it) and he was Doom. But it's not like they didn't give us Doom, it's more like the story & character didn't develop to that point yet. Surely in the sequel we'll get the Doom we all expected and what Tim is promising us. I can't wait. I like the trailer cause it kind of makes everyone out there forget about Doom. In the meantime hopefully they're making the best follow up trailer possible and now it's time to unveil Doom...but just a little bit. Don't spoil to much.
 
Editing notwithstanding, the script is truly to blame for the film's overall feel. The main problem was with Doom and that he was on the Space station. They could have easliy had him on earth, have something related to the mission blow up in his face, have him lose the company and disappear because of his injury and disgrace. Then they could have cut to several months later, FF are more famous than ever, stopping meteors or something and then Doom begins to exact his revenge on board members one by one, lures the FF to Latveria and presto, he have Dr. Doom. It may sound a little like Corman's, but with the budget they had it wouldn't have stank like that one. It is a simple formula that screenwriters and executives seem to think won't work. Yet films like Superman, Batman, Spider-man and other have proved them wrong. Let's just hope this Payne dude has a clue.
 
Right. This movie is loaded with potential. If it is edited correctly. The 1st one was edited so much because there was no action sequence until the last 10 minutes. This film will have more action, and faster paced. It will not plod along like the 1st one did. And that I feel will make the difference in the editing. At least that is my hope. Time will tell. :whatever:
 
^ I stand by the fact that even with better editing the film main suffering came from the characterization of Doom. Better origin = better villain. Better villain = better movie.
 
^ That's fixable. What did you expect though? Doom just to suddenly be some evil ruler from Latveria that pops up out of nowhere with zilions of doombots and in full form with no origin. Don't forget they had to tell the origin of 5 characters so it takes time on each one which ate up most of the film. I'm happy with that and had no problem with the change of his origin. He wasn't really Doom yet. Now he will be.
 
^ That's fixable. What did you expect though? Doom just to suddenly be some evil ruler from Latveria that pops up out of nowhere with zilions of doombots and in full form with no origin. Don't forget they had to tell the origin of 5 characters so it takes time on each one which ate up most of the film. I'm happy with that and had no problem with the change of his origin. He wasn't really Doom yet. Now he will be.


We "hope" he will be.....thats not set in stone yet! Many things were "said" last time around, but much did not happen that was said would happen. I remember these words from Ioan in one of the press junkets. And I quote................. "The fans of the comic, will not be disappointed."


Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm................
 
:huh: :huh: :huh: the editing and time go hand in hand....if you are worried about the editing, you better sure as hell be worried about the time, or have you forgotten the 17 minutes of deleted scenes that were totally important to the storyline, but were left out for some insanely stupid reason that I have yet to come up with.


They were trying to get in as many shows as possible. So they sacrificed quality for money.
 
They were trying to get in as many shows as possible. So they sacrificed quality for money.

Though we do not know that for sure......that is definitely a possibility...
 
They were trying to get in as many shows as possible. So they sacrificed quality for money.

It's interesting that Sony knows how to rake in the biggest cash and most shows (with the Spider-Man franchise) without having to sacrifice any quality. :whatever:
 
It's interesting that Sony knows how to rake in the biggest cash and most shows (with the Spider-Man franchise) without having to sacrifice any quality. :whatever:

POTC 2 proved you can have a 2 and a half hour, good, entertaining movie, and make a ton of money. Over a billion to be exact. Then on the other hand, you can have a 2 and a half hour movie that strugles to make 200 domestic. :o Depends on the quality, and marketing of the film. Saw Ghost Rider today. Not bad. :woot: Good start for the year of Marvel.
 
It's interesting that Sony knows how to rake in the biggest cash and most shows (with the Spider-Man franchise) without having to sacrifice any quality. :whatever:

Exactly, Sony has what you might call a better range of vehicles or revenue models than Fox. To get into Spidey territory you have to be able to take a hit and be a risk taker and you have to give your director some leeway. Its just a culture thing.

Fox really does not have as we might say the assets of the silver surfer in that famous frame everyone likes to talk about or they would break their mold and see if they can get to a Spiderman type return. When you have a movie making over 100 million in its first weekend like Xmen3 you have a shot at Spiderman like numbers.

It is interesting in that their one franchise that got up there Star Wars was handled almost entirely by Lucas and his production company.

The question though is can fox change their culture. It is not an easy thing to do.

Rothman would basically have to change his stars or something and as we suspect he may be locked in his current form (punishment for Electra I think lol)
 
POTC 2 proved you can have a 2 and a half hour, good, entertaining movie, and make a ton of money. Over a billion to be exact. Then on the other hand, you can have a 2 and a half hour movie that strugles to make 200 domestic. :o Depends on the quality, and marketing of the film. Saw Ghost Rider today. Not bad. :woot: Good start for the year of Marvel.

Yeah looks like a 50-55 million for the president's weekend. With the storms I suspect that a lot of people did not go to the movies this weekend and that means that the numbers are depressed and that it should hold up well next weekend.

And yes the kids loved it. Some came out of the movie talking and laughing about Ghost Rider.
 
And yes the kids loved it. Some came out of the movie talking and laughing about Ghost Rider.

Then it susceded. Young people is who it was geared to. I never was a big Ghost Rider fan. And still am not, but I enjoyed the movie.
 
From VANCOUVER FILM.NET:

Saturday, February 24, 2007

"Fantastic Four 2" Wraps BC Shoot

ffcaran0.jpg


Comic book-to-movie heroes the 'Fantastic Four' learn they are not the only super-powered beings in the universe when they square off against the powerful 'Silver Surfer' and planet-eating 'Galactus' in director Tim Story's 20th Century Fox feature "Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer".

Vancouver location shooting started August 31 and wrapped December 10.

ff049bv9.jpg


A special thanks goes out to director Story for Michael Stevens' on-screen 'cameo' as
a startled 'airline passenger' in a scene where 'Mr. Fantastic' stretches his arm across crowded aisles in a wide-bodied jet to help a flight attendant catch falling luggage from an overhead compartment.

"Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer", the sequel to last year's box office hit stars Ioan Gruffudd as 'Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic', Jessica Alba as 'Susan Storm/Invisible Woman', Chris Evans as 'Johnny Storm/The Human Torch' and Michael Chiklis as 'Ben Grimm/The Thing'.

The film opens everywhere June 15, 2007.

ff3tx3.jpg


Click here for more "Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer"
Source: http://vancouverfilm.blogspot.com/2007/02/fantastic-four-2-wraps-bc-shoot.html
 
So is FF2 in post production now?
I hope they have more Reed in it this times, he didn't really stretch to much in the last one and when he did it didnt look to good, sometimes his clothes would stretch with him :huh:
 
So is FF2 in post production now?
I hope they have more Reed in it this times, he didn't really stretch to much in the last one and when he did it didnt look to good, sometimes his clothes would stretch with him :huh:
Yeah, they are in post now. :)
 
http://www.accesshollywood.com/movies/ah4281.shtml

New behind the scenes video. I also started a thread specifically for any TV Promotions of the film you find out there. Video's, etc...

:wow: :woot: That was great. We all saw still pics, but to actually see it happening was great. Appears the Surfer comes right from the gate. Preacher says " Dearly beloved we have gathered here today.....", then bam the Surfer arrives. And Sue saves the day, so far. How cool is that ?
 
Heres a report from someone who worked on the movie back in November.

Odds And Sods. ******ed Rugrat
Dwayne Jenkings | by ******edrugrat.wordpress.com. All rights reserved. 10.01

83nj6.jpg


As mentioned in a post some weeks back, the film and tv industry has been very slow this year, and as a result, Jeff got very few calls. Now, this time last year, he d just started working at in order for us to survive through the winter after a VERY busy summer in the film and tv industry.
Last Friday night, Jeff and I were sat at home relaxing when the phone rang.

It was IATSE dispatch - could Jeff accept a call for Saturday? Yes he could. So, on Saturday he did a shoot with Fantastic Four 2 - a 19 hour shoot as it turns out, causing me much panic and stress when I didn t know where the hell he was and why he was 4 hours late home.

As it turns out, the crew were rather slow in wrapping the set after they d finished shooting. For his troubles, Jeff didn t exactly get away scot free.
What you see there is a burn he sustained when a faulty light fell apart on him as he repositioned it.

Nice huh?
Anywayz, this burn has forced Jeffers to take a few days off work while it heals. It s been a worrying few days for him, because obviously with our move next week, the more available funds we have, the better.

So, last night, he put his name back on the available list, certainly not expecting anything for a few weeks. Imagine his surprise when he got a call early in the afternoon today for a shoot tonight - a tv series called Fallen. They started shooting at 5pm, and I can expect Jeffers sometime after 8am in the morning.

Lets just hope he doesn t burn his other arm tonight. He s grumpy when he s forced to take time off work.
We ve finally bought all the essentials that we needed for Tara before next week.

She s coming home on Friday we think, possibly Thursday depending on how our move goes. I cannot WAIT. It s been a long month and a half wait to bring her home, and now it s so close I can barely stand it.

There is a chance we may be offline for a number of days when we move. We re thinking about switching to a different Internet Service provider and it all depends on when they could hook us up. Rest assured however that I ll be back as soon as possible with all the details of the move and how Tara has settled in with us.


Wish us luck on the move!
Ciao.
on Friday, November 24th, 2006 at 12:25 am and is filed under , , , , and .

You can this entry. Best of luck with the move - they are always stressful! (Perhaps you should remind Jeff to be careful with his limbs too you only get so many!

)
- November 24th, 2006 at 5:19 am Pfffttt!!!

! Besides Todd, it wasn t my fault. The lamp was faulty.

We had to wedge the bugger shut with a pony clip. Ironically, you only find these things out when you shoot on a rooftop, and you have lights on the street pointed up to light the buildings.
- November 24th, 2006 at 1:06 pm Nasty burn there, jeffers lovey .

.
- November 24th, 2006 at 1:15 pm - November 24th, 2006 at 1:31 pm True enough, though I get the feeling Todd implied it.
- November 24th, 2006 at 1:59 pm [ ] Again, as consistent readers will know, I got injured on the set of Fantastic Four.

You can read details on this post, or this post. One. [ ]
- November 24th, 2006 at 10:51 pm There is a usually an unfortunate amount of risk when you are using equipment you are unfamiliar with (in the sense that you haven t worked with that particular piece of equipment before, especially since it is a rental.

) It likely didn t make the news in BC but a worker was killed at a stamping plant in Newmarket a couple of days ago. Details are sketchy but the rumour mill has it that a temp was operating a press when he accidentally cycled it with the experienced hand leaning in for an adjustment.
I didn t mean to imply that it was your fault the lamp wasn t up to spec however I was implying a need for more caution on your part.

Just because equipment shouldn t kill you doesn t mean that it won t. It s better to be paranoid than maimed (or dead.)
- November 25th, 2006 at 8:11 am Hmm.

You re right in one way. I never used a 18 k HMI light in Ontario. Not because they don t exist there because they do.

In fact, rental houses in Ontario carry that exact light. Rather, I didn t use that light for a different reason.
I had never used that light in Ontario for a different reason.

I had never worked on a show that boasted enough money to be able to afford an 18 k. Well, afford an 18 k and have an arsenal of other lights to boot.
I have used it extensively in Vancouver.

I first saw it on The Dead Zone in July 2006, and have used it on many, MANY sets since.
It popped out for this reason. The scene being shot was a rooftop, and I was on the ground babysitting a couple of lights, lighting buildings in the background.

Because a light is normally pointed down, the faulty latch is normally tough to spot. But, pointing it upward, the slightest thing (like a pan or tilt) could cause the latch to malfunction. Which it did.

Luckily the Best Boy caught it immediately. And it even popped out on him too. He was just better prepared for it as after it happened to me, we both figured something was up with the light.


As such, it s not anything you can normally anticipate. And I digress to your point of paranoia. Sometimes paranoia can lead to more mistake making by the person.

Maybe it s just a sense of grass is greener on the other side.
- November 25th, 2006 at 10:14 am Maintenance costs money so it is a safe bet to assume the equipment you are working with could very well be on it s way to failure. At the very least, a jury rigged piece of equipment should be flagged as such to warn others to prevent this exact sort of injury.

Under Ontario labour laws the supervisor would be held legally liable for not inspecting and signing off on the equipment. Mind you, the metal working industry is a bit more dangerous than film-making (the aforementioned worker was hit by a 1200-ton press running a hand transfer die) so my paranoia is likely more justified here than there. That being said, your hands are your livelihood protect them at all costs!


- Todd.
- November 25th, 2006 at 11:57 am Shy on details but is what I am referring to.
- November 25th, 2006 at 12:07 pm Oh I do protect my hands.

And the WCB regulations are even more stringent here than out in Ontario. However, maintainence of lights falls under the juridiction of the rental house, and finding faults in equipment is ours. However, one thing that occurs regularly is gear getting labelled NFG, without any explaination, and when no fault is found, no work is done on the lamp.

Who knows how many shows that lamp had been on before with the faulty latch.
And besides, with the hugest budget in Vancouver presently, FF2 rents from the cheapest and worst rental house in the city. Grr.


- November 25th, 2006 at 12:28 pm Well, I m not blaming you but I d just like to close this discussion with the reminder that I want to be the best man at your wedding, not a pall-bearer at your funeral. Please be careful eh?
Now, to get a rousing debate going on your site going let s use this for fodder:
I m so irritated by this article I could chew nails and spit thumbtacks!


- November 25th, 2006 at 12:48 pm I m more worried about getting some form of cancer being near the HMI ballasts than a falling or faulty light though.
- November 25th, 2006 at 4:10 pm Rumour has it that Jeff didn t get that burn mark at work but at home when you attacked him with an iron for snoring in his sleep! Is this true?

You re a wild, wild woman!
Yorkshire Pudding - November 26th, 2006 at 5:10 pm - November 27th, 2006 at 9:31 am Yorkshire Pudding, to put things bluntly, I d sooner get attacked by either a frying pan or a spatula (though the spatula is actually bendy). Anything can happen though when Wednesday isn t winning.


All rights for the published information belongs to ******edrugrat.wordpress.com
Source: http://career2007.com/id/83/
 
Looks like reshoots will start during the coming week!

FANTASTIC FOUR 2 RESHOOT
Feature Film
MOUNTY PRODUCTIONS LTD for FOX
Contract: MASTER
Co-ordinator: SCOTT IRVINE
Captain 1: DAVID HOLM
BLDG K, 3500 CORNETT RD
VANCOUVER,
Schedule: Mar 29, 2007 to
Captain 2:
ASC Captain: RICHARD WYNNYK
Steward: Unassigned
Prod Manager: STEWART
Source:http://www.teamsters155.org/WebDocuments/rptProdACtiveList.pdf
 
Isn't it a bit late in the balgame for reshoots ? 81 days out from opening ? :huh: 11.7 weeks. Unless they are reshooting scenes, that do not require much CGI work. However thanks for that update retro.
 
Hey, X3 was re-shooting in April, and that came out in May, weeks before FF, so anything's possible!
 
I have spoken with a couple of my sources who are saying that the reshoots are just some minor bits that need to be tweaked, nothing major. :D It's not stuff involving major cgi or anything, just some character bits where they may want to tweak dialogue a little for flow.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"