New info?

I have no problem with Sandman being an anti-hero, using the term loosely. Whether or not his daughter is ill, he still leaves a life of crime, robbing, looting, and even killing (possibly more then once). True, his "motive" is to save his daughter, however, I have a distinct feeling his doing it for himself as well.

Besides, Sandman goes good in the comics anyway.
well sandmans main goal in this film is to not only save his daughter but to save his whole family because of how poor they are. he doesn't care about himself (although he is a sympathetic villian in the movies all the way) and he really has no other purpose in his life right now. his wife and daughter are the only things he cares about and in fact he's willing to risk his own life to save them. until he transforms into sand then he's unstopable. It's still the same thing though, I mean he stops fighting because of his daughter which is sad and shows how much more his family means to him than killing spidey.
 
Pretty cool info if true.

The only thing that I don't like is the fact that Eddie may kick it. To me with Sony wanting to do 3 more films, they don't have many more 'cool' vilians that would go well in movie format. The Lizard and that is about it. Carnage.....he was just a mindless monster.

But I guess in late March we will have the answer.
 
I like the idea of Harry trying to manipulate Mary Jane.

Me too.

That's what was missing in Spider-Man 1 between Norman and Peter: mind games. And aerial battles, too.

I hope Harry makes up for that.
 
That's from Spidey's first battle with Sandman during Spider-Man Day I think. Premiere Magazine confirmed that Spidey would save Gwen in his first battle. Also, she has the pink shirt she was wearing at SPider-Man Day on.

You Think!?! :huh: Hell, you been saying with certainty that it is, now you think. Sound like a Flip-Flopper to me.

Boy I can not wait when everything yall say is going to happen because of your belief in the Q&A and Script Summary, both fan made, does not turn out exactly the way you think. EGG on your FACE my friends. :cwink:
 
/fangirl on

They really can't kill Brock and have the Symbiote survive, it's stupid. Like everyone has been saying all along, you can't have Carnage without Venom.... I mean you can, but why would you? I hope that if this is the case, they just write the symbiote off and not give it to mac gargan. I also don't see the point (I know I am contradicting myself) in writing the symbiote off when there was an entire movie devoted to it. MY hopes are that Brock lives and is possibly put into a hospital or that maybe after being defeated the symbiote will slither back on to Brock.

/fangirl off
 
The fact is, the symbiote never dies. :up:

Just the person that it has bonded with.
 
I dont get why we cant get our awesome ending with Brock going to Ravencroft or something. Brock can bide his time and plot to get back at Parker. He doesnt need to run around exposing his identity. That really doesn't fit his MO.
 
Pretty interesting. Most of it familiar, but some different touches in there.

Again, the only major concern I have with this film (and I've said this a dozen times) is how the symbiote even ties into the story origin-wise. Because, to me, it just popping up out of nowhere or flying down from space is kinda random and ridiculous in the semi-realism world they've created in these films so far.
 
You Think!?! :huh: Hell, you been saying with certainty that it is, now you think. Sound like a Flip-Flopper to me.

Boy I can not wait when everything yall say is going to happen because of your belief in the Q&A and Script Summary, both fan made, does not turn out exactly the way you think. EGG on your FACE my friends. :cwink:
This coming from a guy who hasn't read either of them obviously. :dry:
 
Spider-Girl™;11143472 said:
/fangirl on

They really can't kill Brock and have the Symbiote survive, it's stupid. Like everyone has been saying all along, you can't have Carnage without Venom.... I mean you can, but why would you? I hope that if this is the case, they just write the symbiote off and not give it to mac gargan. I also don't see the point (I know I am contradicting myself) in writing the symbiote off when there was an entire movie devoted to it. MY hopes are that Brock lives and is possibly put into a hospital or that maybe after being defeated the symbiote will slither back on to Brock.

/fangirl off
they can, because when brock dies, the symbiote can just crawl into the ocean or hide in the sewer. I mean the symbiote doesn't have to bond with somebody to stay alive or anything like that which is why it should remain alive to give you a creepy feeling because you know it is still out there......somewhere.

possibly put in a hopsital? well that depends on how bad the impact or affect of what supposedly kills him, because if it's not so bad that it could kill him then sure theres a defenite chance of him being put in a hospital. as far as we know venom gets shanked, which I think could be proven false but more proven right because of the very reliable Q&A and the ever so clever script summary that we should all love because it's got mostly all the right answers.
 
they can, because when brock dies, the symbiote can just crawl into the ocean or hide in the sewer. I mean the symbiote doesn't have to bond with somebody to stay alive or anything like that which is why it should remain alive to give you a creepy feeling because you know it is still out there......somewhere.

possibly put in a hopsital? well that depends on how bad the impact or affect of what supposedly kills him, because if it's not so bad that it could kill him then sure theres a defenite chance of him being put in a hospital. as far as we know venom gets shanked, which I think could be proven false but more proven right because of the very reliable Q&A and the ever so clever script summary that we should all love because it's got mostly all the right answers.

i get what your saying, and this is possibly why The V-Man shouldn't have been in these movies, atleast not under Raimi. Because while possibly doing the character justice, it seems like a waste (like i said before) to introduce it into the movie. Have it be one of the "main stars" and then leave it with no resolution at the end. So here is to me praying that Raimi filmed alternate endings or wrote them, and that he likes the character enough to continue Brock's existance.
 
Spider-Girl™;11143898 said:
i get what your saying, and this is possibly why The V-Man shouldn't have been in these movies, atleast not under Raimi. Because while possibly doing the character justice, it seems like a waste (like i said before) to introduce it into the movie. Have it be one of the "main stars" and then leave it with no resolution at the end. So here is to me praying that Raimi filmed alternate endings or wrote them, and that he likes the character enough to continue Brock's existance.
it's not really a waste because brocks story was leading up to venom, and the reason of that is because brocks story had to be told in one movie. If sam knew that fans were going to complain about the symbiote going to hide some place and have brock die then he must have made an alternate ending while he was writing the script because he had to think if the ending made sense or if it was going to be a wondering ending (by wondering ending I mean leaving you hanging).

I mean if brock is going to die then having symbiote live will just increase our curiosity and will just raise one question........"what will happen next?". hell sam could have brock die and make the symbiote live but leave us with a little suprise. sam could fool us into thinking that brock is dead when he really isn't, that is a bit cheesey though. I really don't know whats going to happen, I mean if the symbiote lives but brock dies then just let it be. sam has grown to like his interpitation of venom so It's up to him to decide what he wants to do with venom.
 
Well what I don't understand is how the hell Venom shows up during the argument with the landlord? I mean surely for that to happen peter would have to be in full spidey gear.
 
Forget Carnage,lets have a female villain in part 4,have the symbiote attach itself to a female to create Scream.Save Carnage for part 5,and what other symbiote villain can we have in part 6.
 
Forget Carnage,lets have a female villain in part 4,have the symbiote attach itself to a female to create Scream.Save Carnage for part 5,and what other symbiote villain can we have in part 6.

Gold, have you been hittin' that pumpkin weed lately? :hyper:
 
Well what I don't understand is how the hell Venom shows up during the argument with the landlord? I mean surely for that to happen peter would have to be in full spidey gear.

IF I remember correctly, The land lord sees Parker in the Spidey suit. I don't remember the source. But I remember it being talked about on the boards. Anyone back me up? lol.
 
Yea I remember hearing that. I figured it was a scene where Red Spidey came out of the bathroom and then goes to lay down and then falls asleep....then comes the symbiote creeping it's way up.
 
hats off to this info! ;D

... or swords out... :P

PotC-III-3.jpg
 
Well what I don't understand is how the hell Venom shows up during the argument with the landlord? I mean surely for that to happen peter would have to be in full spidey gear.

Peter is wearing the symbiote under his civvies and when angered by the landlord, the fangs and so forth appear. I doubt the landlord connects this to Spidey, he just thinks it's some scary-weidness from Peter.
 
Meh...all stuff I kind of already knew.
 
Peter is wearing the symbiote under his civvies and when angered by the landlord, the fangs and so forth appear. I doubt the landlord connects this to Spidey, he just thinks it's some scary-weidness from Peter.

Yeh this I can understand but the whole seeing him in the spidersuit makes no sense as the argument is about rent.

I still don't think it shows itself to the landlord though... think back to the scene where peter is looking in the mirror while he has the black suit under his clothes, maybe thats just after the fight about rent and he's still angry.
 
Yeh this I can understand but the whole seeing him in the spidersuit makes no sense as the argument is about rent.

I still don't think it shows itself to the landlord though... think back to the scene where peter is looking in the mirror while he has the black suit under his clothes, maybe thats just after the fight about rent and he's still angry.

Multiple sources have said the symbiote rears its ugly head to Dikovich.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,269
Messages
22,077,575
Members
45,877
Latest member
dude9876
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"