Comics New Interview - Steve Wacker:

[ben_reilly_s_s]

Thank you TMoB.

 

[Themanofbat]

Thank you TMoB.

No sweat...

If you don't have the issues, it's the trade that comes after Sins Past.

 

[ben_reilly_s_s]

I have no hard copies of comics left, sold them when Sins Past was done....
I'll just go and download them....

 

[moraldeficiency]

He uses Peter's name because he is aware that Peter and Tony already have a relationship. So the Tony/Peter relationship began prior to Skin Deep.

So there is nocontradiction.

False, tony only allowed the project because he knew peter parker was spider-man without that relationship and knowledge it would never have happened, though apparently harry funded this which makes tony redundant and really doesn't make sense without the retcon. Now going by the OMD BS of "everything still happened the same with the exception of the issues that didn't but everyone remembers differently and we'll never reference the stories the same again or use them for anything without drastically changing them" tony cannot make sense given what harry said.

 

[ben_reilly_s_s]

And it starts......
the breakdown of continuity, even more so than before.....
Shoulda just killed off MJ - remember that whole Red-Head to Heaven thing?

 

[Themanofbat]

False, tony only allowed the project because he knew peter parker was spider-man without that relationship and knowledge it would never have happened, though apparently harry funded this which makes tony redundant and really doesn't make sense without the retcon. Now going by the OMD BS of "everything still happened the same with the exception of the issues that didn't but everyone remembers differently and we'll never reference the stories the same again or use them for anything without drastically changing them" tony cannot make sense given what harry said.

Not wanting to start an argument, but I'd like to know where it states that "Harry funded Charlie's experiments"... because after reading the last few pages of ASM #582, Harry simply states that he tested his experimental drug on one human volunteer... which turned out to be Charlie...

So if you can tell me where it states that Harry funded the initial project that turned Charlie into MM2, I'll believe you that Marvel is bending history to suit their stories...

 

[moraldeficiency]

Not wanting to start an argument, but I'd like to know where it states that "Harry funded Charlie's experiments"... because after reading the last few pages of ASM #582, Harry simply states that he tested his experimental drug on one human volunteer... which turned out to be Charlie...

So if you can tell me where it states that Harry funded the initial project that turned Charlie into MM2, I'll believe you that Marvel is bending history to suit their stories...

While I agree it wasn't directly said that harry funded it, it was clearly implied. Just because you have a volunteer it doesn't mean all costs for experimental metal skin grafts are free. I mean if it was harry's experimental drug (which it wasn't in the original story, so point already made there) I'm assuming he didn't get it for free.

 

[ben_reilly_s_s]

I just read a few pages of the issue where they "explain" Harry's return...
Pete said something about how they "talked, skimmed, and just avoided talking about it."
He also said something about him recieving Postcards or Letters from Harry while he was in re-hab???????
WTF????
Why doesnt that seem to bother anyone?
Like a trick by an old enemy - Chamelion
Or just doubt it....
It just makes no sence...
to me at least....

 

[Themanofbat]

I just read a few pages of the issue where they "explain" Harry's return...
Pete said something about how they "talked, skimmed, and just avoided talking about it."
He also said something about him recieving Postcards or Letters from Harry while he was in re-hab???????
WTF????
Why doesnt that seem to bother anyone?
Like a trick by an old enemy - Chamelion
Or just doubt it....
It just makes no sence...
to me at least....

If you read the prior sentence, Pete says "you've shown me the paperwork", so maybe he was reffering to "unsent postcards" with dates on them...

 

[ben_reilly_s_s]

Like it could'nt have been Chamelion or someone else that sent them to mess with his mind, and since Mysterio supposedly helped "bury" Harry, why doesnt he think that maybe this is some way more elaborate scheme having harry back, hell, when Aunt May returned, Pete continually doubted it, till Reed proved it, I know there is no way Harry would've agreed to that testing.

 

[imdaly]

Like it could'nt have been Chamelion or someone else that sent them to mess with his mind, and since Mysterio supposedly helped "bury" Harry, why doesnt he think that maybe this is some way more elaborate scheme having harry back, hell, when Aunt May returned, Pete continually doubted it, till Reed proved it, I know there is no way Harry would've agreed to that testing.

Because Harry's dad came back the same way.

And why wouldn't Harry agree to proving he's the real deal??

 

[moraldeficiency]

Because Harry's dad came back the same way.

And why wouldn't Harry agree to proving he's the real deal??

Totally wrong. Norman came back from injuries because of the serum. Harry died and came back from the serum. That's not even remotely similiar or logical.