• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

New Joe Fridays Week 26 Dan Slott's New Book announced

Looks like Marvel's switiching out artists again, Finch is off Moon Knight.
 
Darthphere said:
Looks like Marvel's switiching out artists again, Finch is off Moon Knight.

joeQ's response to that question made me nauseous.
 
gildea said:
joeQ's response to that question made me nauseous.


You mean this:

JQ: Hey, Skatonic, David is moving on to some amazing projects that I think will blow you away down the road. David has been so instrumental in the launching of Moon Knight that it's next to impossible to imagine the book without him, but we think you're going to dig what Mico brings to the table. As a matter of fact, Newsarama will be showing a sample of Mico's art this week. I think that when you see it, you'll agree that while it's tough to replace a genius like Dave Finch, Mico is definitely a talent to keep an eye on.
 
yup thats the one.

Its just so used car salesman.
 
This is disgusting:

RQ: pendragon12 - In Wolverine #43, Nitro blasted Wolverine apart, with only his skeleton showing. Then he's completely healed. When Nitro was done, all we could see was bones. No tendons. No cartilage. No ligaments. That would mean the knee should have been in four separate pieces. Patella, femur, fibula, muscles, & tibia should have been destroyed at first. Unable to keep the knee together. And with the force of the blast, they would have separated. How did his healing factor keep the knee together? It doesn't seem possible. Please explain.

JQ: Great question, Pendragon! Just roll with it. As soon as I can figure out how to explain how bones can be laced with metal, beams shoot out of people's eyes and how a man can fly, I'll have the answer ;-)

In all seriousness, the answer is in your question, all you could SEE were bones. Also, check out Wolverine #48 for more on this.
 
you know given the artist involved that doesn't bother me so and smacks (IMO, only mine) of a fan taking something over seriously.

Having said that according to the answer it will be explained (ok showing far too much faith).
 
gildea said:
you know given the artist involved that doesn't bother me so and smacks (IMO, only mine) of a fan taking something over seriously.

Having said that according to the answer it will be explained (ok showing far too much faith).


Specifically, this part bothered me "As soon as I can figure out how to explain how bones can be laced with metal, beams shoot out of people's eyes and how a man can fly, I'll have the answer" It reminds me of a debate I had with The Question.


Also, its Avengers:The Initiative.
 
Darthphere said:
Specifically, this part bothered me "As soon as I can figure out how to explain how bones can be laced with metal, beams shoot out of people's eyes and how a man can fly, I'll have the answer" It reminds me of a debate I had with The Question.


Also, its Avengers:The Initiative.

Whilst there was a certain level of smugness in the answer there was a comparitive level of smugness in the question. I can't say I would have treated it with any less contempt.
 
Seemed like any other fanboy question really.
 
I'm pretty sure that's the reason for the smugness, because it was a "too much of a fanboy" question in his eyes.

P.S.: I just finished the article and it saddens me to no end that Joe compared Slott to Bendis. Sure, it's a good thing in HIS eyes, but in mine........:(
 
I'm curious about the X-Event, and am excited to see a crossover like in the 90's. I liked those things, and I'm excited to see how the current X-Titles interact.

X-Men, Uncanny X-Men, Astonishing X-Men, New X-Men, X-Factor, New Excalibur, Wolverine, Cable & Deadpool. I'm curious how many of them will be involved. I figure anything with "X-Men" in it, but I'm curious what else.

I also liked the mentions of the Beyond! people.. specifically Gravity's story continuing in Fantastic Four and the Hood's showing up in future New Avengers issues.
 
This is off-topic but can anyone tell me how to post jpegs or tiffs in a response.
 
The_Mystery said:
This is off-topic but can anyone tell me how to post jpegs or tiffs in a response.

If it's already hosted on a site, then you could try just copying and pasting, if not, you'll need to host it on an image hosting site such as Imageshack or Photobucket.
 
The_Mystery said:
This is off-topic but can anyone tell me how to post jpegs or tiffs in a response.

Photobucket.com allows you to host images for free (and is where I host mine), you just need to sign up. Now if you mean a pic from another site and not one you loaded up to a site like that, then right click the pic and select "Copy Image Location". Then when you're replying to a post, either click the image at the top of the box that looks like
insertimage.gif
, or type
IMG].
 
So Dan Slott's new book is officially titled, eh? I'm still very interested. Does this mean Slott on an Older School Avengers roster, or a whole new team? It's good that Joe Q thinks so highly of him, although he's oblivious that it's his company's lack of promotion of Slott's past titles that have caused him to be a "best least known writer" in the biz. Plus, he's been in the biz a good 10-15 years, he's hardly a rookie.

Some lowlights:

Joe Q said:
But heck, there are people right now reading this that at one point or another or on a consistent basis view me as a huge idiot.

No offense to Marvel's Lord and Master, but you hardly do much to put aside that notion. Evidence?

Joe Q said:
Recently at Marvel we've seen the introduction of the Sentry, Echo, Ronin, Runaways, Arana, X-Statix, NYX , X-23, Jessica Jones, Santerians, Marvel Boy, Gravity, Live Wires, Vegas, Spellbinders, The Hood, Underworld and Awesome Andy just to name a few. While none are icons at this juncture (though my money's on Awesome Andy), they're still new characters and I think show that there is definitely a shift going on.
Awesome Andy, cool as he is, is NOT a new character. He is the Awesome Andriod with a new motive and revamp, at least unless Slott changed that. Lee & Kirby made him in the 60's. I could shrug it off if a casual fan made that error, but you're the EIC. You should know a little better. It's stuff like that which makes some folks see you "as a huge idiot".

mikeyg - Joe, I'm a huge fan of Marvel Comics, but your paper stock is killing me. It warps in the heat, the ink rubs off on your fingers and this month the center page tore out of two of my books as I was reading them, Uncanny X-Men and Onslaught Reborn. Since it's the center page the staple just tore the flimsy paper as I was turning the page. Are there any plans to upgrade the paper stock to something a little more durable?

JQ: Hey, Mikeyg, I checked up and down the halls of Marvel today to see if anyone in editorial, sales or production have heard of this happening of late and as far as anyone can tell, this is the first we're hearing about this problem with our current paper stock. But, here's the thing, I don't doubt anything that you're saying here. You're suffering from a condition that is striking at the heart of every True Believer who is reading our current batch of Marvel titles. I'm very familiar with the symptoms, you're blood pressure is rising, you're at the edge of your seat, your palms are getting sweaty, you're brow's soaked and you're hands are shaking. Don't panic, it's been happening a lot and to be honest, outside of printing our comics on sweat proof Kevlar, I don't think there's anything I can do to help you in this matter.

And here you are answering a legit question about the paper quality, which is one of the few "real" reasons that have been given as to why no Marvel comic can be below $2.99, with a blow-off. I've actually had ink smudges and whatnot in some rare books. It's something that may be explained via a shipping bungle or accident, but who needs that when you can just make a joke at his expense? That's what customers like, they enjoy being mocked while bringing up a legit question.

Before iloveclones mentions his "the customer is always right, except when he/she is a jerk" pariable (which is wise & true), the customer I didn't think was being a jerk here. It was a legit question and I am sure Joe could have given a better answer.

So, Joe, if you don't want to be seen as an idiot, stop coming off like one. "If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, and all that..."

At least he made fun of Mark Millar's obnoxious promise about finishing Ultimates 2 in 2006.

And while Finch has kicked arse on MOON KNIGHT, every issue since maybe the first or second has been a good 3 weeks late or so because of him so if they want to give another artist who may be timlier a try, then so be it. At least the first arc is over. Let's see Mico Suayan's stuff and judge it fairly.

Joe Q said:
Singer/McNiven/ Ultimate X-Men- we'll see, but hopefully 2007

I can't believe that Joe Q is STILL holding out hope for "Singer on Ultimate XM in 2007". Dude, you've been trying to sell his run for about 2 full years! I remember when BKV was merely supposed to do a 6-9 issue run to "lead up" to Singer, and then ended up doing another 10 issues (plus an annual). Then I remembered Kirkman only supposed to be on for 9 issues for the same reason, and now he's the writer for "the forseeable future", i.e. maybe a year and a half like Vaughan. Singer left X-MEN 3 for WB's SUPERMAN RETURNS and has left a core Ultimate book hanging with delays for two calender years...and I doubt the fans of the book are nearly as eager for Singer as Wizard and the editors are. THIS is why writers & artists at Marvel are such primadonnas about deadlines; here Singer has essentially stood up Marvel since 2005 and they're STILL waiting with the door open. If his first issue can't even come on time, are you really expecting TWELVE to be on-time!? This isn't even mentioning that McNiven can't even do a 7 issue event title on time, much less a 12 issue stint on UXM. This sort of thinking leads to, well, EVIL THAT MEN DO and ULTIMATE WOLVERINE VS. HULK debacles. Joe, when you're stood up, eventually you have to leave and let go. Otherwise you come off as needy and get taken advantage of. And you seem to have no end of writers and artists who more than abuse your "good faith" system. It's time to crush some ego's. You'd only need to do it once or twice to send the message. Maybe THEN some fewer people will see you as a "huge idiot".

"We'll see!?" A boss who can't hold employees to a deadline is a wuss. I hate being crude, but there it is. Joe not only seems uninclined, but POWERLESS. That is the problem.

And only a hopeless X-fan truly wants the level of overexoposure that they had in the 90's. When Marvel only focuses on them, the MU suffers. CW has it's flaws but at least it has propped up most of the MU (at least what ANNIHILATION missed).

Good to know McDuffie will follow up BEYOND! on FF, even if FF has a jack stupid line-up that makes zero sense, unless you imagine an editor with a Marvel Handbook and a 100 sided die.

And definately bring on Slott's influence and book! "Meh" title aside, even Slott at his worst beats many books at their best. I am not expecting his worst.
 
Dread said:
No offense to Marvel's Lord and Master, but you hardly do much to put aside that notion. Evidence?


Well he has okayed alot of really good books.
 
Kool-Aid said:
Well he has okayed alot of really good books.
Touche'. I have to give you that one. I'm just saying that Joe Q can be his own worst enemy sometimes.
 
Darthphere said:
Looks like Marvel's switiching out artists again, Finch is off Moon Knight.

I think that is a terrible move by Marvel.
 
Dread said:
Touche'. I have to give you that one. I'm just saying that Joe Q can be his own worst enemy sometimes.


Yeah, you're right. He has also okayed alot of really bad books though too. Its weird because there doesn't really seem to be that much a middle ground with him. He goes from one extreme to the other in terms of okaying things.
 
FadingCB said:
Photobucket.com allows you to host images for free (and is where I host mine), you just need to sign up. Now if you mean a pic from another site and not one you loaded up to a site like that, then right click the pic and select "Copy Image Location". Then when you're replying to a post, either click the image at the top of the box that looks like
insertimage.gif
, or type then (put a [ in front, not doing so it will show up) /IMG] at the end of it. If you click the yellow thing then click in the box that comes up and hit "control+V" to paste it, or right click and click paste. If you type the [IMG] out, then simply do the same, but inbetween it and the ([) /IMG].[/quote]

Thanks folks. I needed it to put up pages from my self-published comic. Check them out if you like on the "How do you really make a comic" thread. That's not exactly the name of the thread but close.

Now back to your regularly scheduled thread conversation. :)
 
Dread said:
And only a hopeless X-fan truly wants the level of overexoposure that they had in the 90's. When Marvel only focuses on them, the MU suffers. CW has it's flaws but at least it has propped up most of the MU (at least what ANNIHILATION missed).

While I am a hopeless X-Fan, I agree with you here. The 90's were awsome for X-Fans, that which I am, but it also kept me from getting into many other Marvel titles at the time, due to finances and just an over fluxuation of titles.

While I'm excited that the X-Universe is going to be getting a jump (me being a fan, and the fact that the X-Titles have barely mediocre for years until just lately), I'm actually into a lot of other Marvel titles now and I don't want to have to start picking and choosing. I hope the X-Books get up to the level of other books again, and they all just do well in the Marvel Universe together.

I just hope they don't try to play Marvel Vs X-Universe... as I'd rather see them co-exist.
 
JewishHobbit said:
While I am a hopeless X-Fan, I agree with you here. The 90's were awsome for X-Fans, that which I am, but it also kept me from getting into many other Marvel titles at the time, due to finances and just an over fluxuation of titles.

While I'm excited that the X-Universe is going to be getting a jump (me being a fan, and the fact that the X-Titles have barely mediocre for years until just lately), I'm actually into a lot of other Marvel titles now and I don't want to have to start picking and choosing. I hope the X-Books get up to the level of other books again, and they all just do well in the Marvel Universe together.

I just hope they don't try to play Marvel Vs X-Universe... as I'd rather see them co-exist.
I agree. I mean Marvel spent a lot of years in the 90's just boosting on the X-Men and letting their other franchises go to seed. CIVIL WAR may not be perfect but it at least adds to Marvel (and Joe's) refocused effort on the rest of the universe. Had some bungles, sure, plenty. But there have also been successes.
 
How many frickin' Avengers series are we gonna have?! Why flood the market with one type of book? I just don't get it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,243
Messages
21,928,955
Members
45,725
Latest member
alwaysgrateful9
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"