BLAQUE-SPIDERMAN said:As did Superman when Jonathan Kent dies, remember? (I'm speaking form the movie's origin of course.) He said, "All these powers, and i couldn't save him." He felt like dookie-on-a-stick, and guilty at the same time. So again, there's another similar trait that both characters embody. Read up on Superman's history, and i'm sure you'll come to the same conclusion, or at least agree with some of the points i made.
BLAQUE-SPIDERMAN said:Because they've had some of the SAME adventures as superheroes. They've both been cloned, (Superman's clone is Bizzaro), killed, and have two of the best arch nemesis in Lex Luthor and Norman Osborn in all of comics (No direspect to the Joker or Doc Ock!). As i staed earlier, they're so much alike its' ridiculous! But that doesn't mean that they're movie franchises are alike though. Sure, certain scenes may've had some similarities, but they still maintain their unique identities as a whole.
Spider-Bite said:Let Luxthor is nowhere near Joker, Ock, Venom, green goblin.
spideyman05 said:So changing your hair makes you look more evil?![]()
![]()
Spider-Bite said:Let Luxthor is nowhere near Joker, Ock, Venom, green goblin.
Yeah, it´s a natural progress of the story.cmill216 said:It was a natural progression for them to go with the "Spidey No More" storyline in SM2. He accepted his destiny, but did he REALLY no how much he'd have to sacrifice?
And now in SM3, he's fully accepted the sacrifices (as has Mary Jane), but what happens when that power you were blessed/cursed with becomes corrupted? Hence, the symbiote.
HA-HA! Well i ain't mad at'cha for sayin' that! Batman is more PG-13/Rated R compared to Spidey, who's a more family friendly hero- though misunderstood. Bats is more Dirty Harry with a kick ass costume, and cool ass gadgets to boot- so you got me there!Abaddon said:SM1 had enough cheese to make BB the better film.
BLAQUE-SPIDERMAN said:Because they've had some of the SAME adventures as superheroes. They've both been cloned, (Superman's clone is Bizzaro), killed, and have two of the best arch nemesis in Lex Luthor and Norman Osborn in all of comics (No direspect to the Joker or Doc Ock!). As i staed earlier, they're so much alike its' ridiculous! But that doesn't mean that they're movie franchises are alike though. Sure, certain scenes may've had some similarities, but they still maintain their unique identities as a whole.
Go to "Peter Parkers Photo Gallery"TheBat812 said:Where are these new pics of Tobey with the black suit?
Batspider77 said:Go to "Peter Parkers Photo Gallery"
Abysstare said:First, for the one poster that suggested Raimi had nothing to do with the story development for this film, that's flat out incorrect. He developed the story with his brother. A script writer took over from there.
Second, having seen the Superman flicks and the Spidey flicks, and having collected comics since the late 70s, there is no doubt in my mind that Raimi has been influenced by the Superman flicks. You can see it in the storytelling, the scenes, and the story arcs. I'd be influenced by them as well. There is not a chance that he wasn't aware of Superman II dealing with Supes loss of his powers when he drafted Spider-Man II. He'd probably even admit to it. So considering Superman III dealt with a Superman under the influence of red kryptonite, do I think it's sheer coincidence that Spider-Man III will be dealing with Spider-Man under the influence of a black symbiote? Of course not.
Now all that said, I don't think it matters all that much. While there are parallels and similarities, the Spidey movies are different enough and the Superman flicks were made long enough ago that it's not really a huge issue. I'm not going to say it's not an issue at ALL, but not a major one.
Besides, let's face it, all superhero comics lift from each other after a while, so this becomes a pointless argument if you look at it that way. I'm sure "Superman Returns" will lift a page or two from the "Spider-Man" movie textbook as it were.
As for why would Raimi utilize a storyline that didn't work the first time, ala Superman III, probably because he hopes to do it RIGHT. After all, it's not the idea, but the execution of the idea that failed.
So fingers crossed for a kick-ass third issue of this cinematic comic-book.![]()
Which is EXACTLY what he´s doing, Pete giving up on being Spidey is a storyline from the comics and so is the black symbiote... geez...James"007"Bond said:Yeah I know they share similar adventures, all superheroes do most of the time but their movie franchises are alike. Its as clear as day, make the comparrisons yourself and you'll see. It doesn't help either with Raimi shooting his mouth off about paying homage all the freakin time and with SR coming out I think its about time Raimi stopped with all the homage crap for supes and actually started paying homage to the spider-man source material.
cmill216 said:Actually....he kind of is. In notoriety, he's right there with the Joker in terms of most well known comic book villain.
TheWebline said:Spoilers below (sort of)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Following the link on the homepage, you see Toby changing into the black suit (sort of). He looks all greasy, frumpy, unkempt, etc. In part II he lost his powers like Superman. Now in this one he looks like he's turning evil like Supes did in Superman III. I know it's just coincidence since that happened to Peter in the Ultimate storyline, but I wonder if people will start to wonder that Sam can't come up with any original plot lines.