spideydave
Civilian
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2001
- Messages
- 960
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Abysstare said:First, for the one poster that suggested Raimi had nothing to do with the story development for this film, that's flat out incorrect. He developed the story with his brother. A script writer took over from there.
Second, having seen the Superman flicks and the Spidey flicks, and having collected comics since the late 70s, there is no doubt in my mind that Raimi has been influenced by the Superman flicks. You can see it in the storytelling, the scenes, and the story arcs. I'd be influenced by them as well. There is not a chance that he wasn't aware of Superman II dealing with Supes loss of his powers when he drafted Spider-Man II. He'd probably even admit to it. So considering Superman III dealt with a Superman under the influence of red kryptonite, do I think it's sheer coincidence that Spider-Man III will be dealing with Spider-Man under the influence of a black symbiote? Of course not.
Now all that said, I don't think it matters all that much. While there are parallels and similarities, the Spidey movies are different enough and the Superman flicks were made long enough ago that it's not really a huge issue. I'm not going to say it's not an issue at ALL, but not a major one.
Besides, let's face it, all superhero comics lift from each other after a while, so this becomes a pointless argument if you look at it that way. I'm sure "Superman Returns" will lift a page or two from the "Spider-Man" movie textbook as it were.
As for why would Raimi utilize a storyline that didn't work the first time, ala Superman III, probably because he hopes to do it RIGHT. After all, it's not the idea, but the execution of the idea that failed.
So fingers crossed for a kick-ass third issue of this cinematic comic-book.![]()
Damn right!
