Juicy J
Sidekick
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,362
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
What other superhero film then? Kick-Ass? The Incredibles?

When did stereotypical become synonymous with racist?
People are gonna crap bricks when/if they introduce Luke Cage into the movieverse.
One of my favorite lines of the movie was
"Dad's leave. No reason to be a ***** about it"
I loved that because I thought we were about to go down a really lame melodramatic moment. But the response was perfect Tony and the way the kid tried to guilt-trip him at the end to. Awesome way to go about that.
What the hell does that mean? This film if anything is a transition to something new. It's not a total closure, but there's resolution here, that if RDJ and Gwyneth do not resign it's a farewell to them. No it's not a trilogy in the strict sense of the word and neither is TDK
TDK has a forced trilogy. He becomes Batman faces the Joker quits for 8 years, comes back and fakes his death. It's a trilogy in that it's 3 movies, but it's not a trilogy in the same way the original Star Wars Trilogy was or The Lord of the Rings, where there's a first second and third act.
People may laugh at this, but all this complaining about the lack of Iron Man reminds me of one of my favorite Iron Man stories.
The Armor Trap by Greg Cox. It's a novel, and it's not canon, but it's one of the most entertaining and exciting Iron Man stories I've ever read. Why? It tests Tony OUT of the suite for most of the page count. War Machine takes up all of the action for most of the book only to have Tony get in on it at the end.
This never bothered me because Cox did such a good job at giving me a good plot, exploring the characters in a true and realistic way. Stark's ingenuity outside of the suite is on full blast here, making the time when he finally puts it on all the more satisfying.
This is what Iron Man 3 does well imo.
It means these is as much a trilogy as Daniel Craig's James Bond films are a trilogy. They're more installments of the same franchise, but on their own, they don't work as a trilogy. It's unlike the Spider-Man trilogy, or the X-Men trilogy, or the TDK trilogy where, where there's a flow and transition from one movie to the other, with continuously unfolding storylines that get developed with each movie until resolved. Here we have IM2 that's as much as a prequel to the Avengers than it is a sequel to IM1, and IM3 which builds upon the Avengers, but still remains a standalone film that almost completely ignores the second film in the franchise and carries over little to no story arcs from the previous two films. On themselves, the IM films build no trilogy, because you obviously can't take out the Avengers from the whole puzzle, you absolutely have to see it in order to get the whole thing.
I disagree 100%, but this is not the Batman forums, so I'll just leave it at that.
For me, this is the best Marvel film to date, stronger and more cohesive than even The Avengers. Comic fans will definitely ***** about the "twist", but the fact of the matter is it WORKED. The audience I was with ate it all up, and so did I, despite being familiar with the true Mandarin from the comics. Props to Marvel for keeping it a secret for so long.
Other than that, the action was incredible and the effects were pretty stellar, except for in a few places where Iron Man is just walking around and they made him CGI for some reason. RDJ was funnier than ever, which was cool because Tony was actually struggling a lot in this one and you could see how his humor is almost like a defense mechanism sometimes. And the opening scene was 'Blue' playing was AWESOME.
Intellectually I can understand fanboys not liking the twist but I don't really care. I litterally have no connection to the comicbook so I can't care. I think the twist is fine, just like how I think making Joker the one who created Two Face is fine. I even liked Rises version of Robin. If it's done well I litterally can't complain. I complained about some changes in some films because the films didn't pull them off. If the film pulls it off I litterally don't care!Fanboys whining about the Mandarin, nitpicking everything like comics were Shakespeare material or something. Some of you take all of this way too seriously when most comics in general are mediocre, full of silliness and nonsense to start with. Expecting cbm to be perfect or Academy award material is incoherent to say the least.
The Dark Knight and Iron Man trilogies complement each other so well. Like cheese and wine. I wish more of the fanboys could see this.
Intellectually I can understand fanboys not liking the twist but I don't really care. I litterally have no connection to the comicbook so I can't care. I think the twist is fine, just like how I think making Joker the one who created Two Face is fine. I even liked Rises version of Robin. If it's done well I litterally can't complain. I complained about some changes in some films because the films didn't pull them off. If the film pulls it off I litterally don't care!
Completely agree with that. I enjoy both very much.
Intellectually I can understand fanboys not liking the twist but I don't really care. I litterally have no connection to the comicbook so I can't care. I think the twist is fine, just like how I think making Joker the one who created Two Face is fine. I even liked Rises version of Robin. If it's done well I litterally can't complain. I complained about some changes in some films because the films didn't pull them off. If the film pulls it off I litterally don't care!
Never understood why people couldn't enjoy both. It always seemed people had to 'pick a side' and defend one movie on movie websites.
All I know is that Mandarin was created as a racist sterotype during a more racist time. I enjoyed that they turned him into another racist sterotype and then made fun of it. In that sense my limited knowledge of something from the comics helped me enjoy the film more. It was a kick in the balls to racism IMHO.I know the source material and the Mandarin is not that great of a character anyway. Marvel had the balls to try something different and it was executed well, so I'm not going to bash them for it. Regarding "Robin", I thought it was completely unnecessary, it added nothing to the character, but I digress.
One of my favorite lines of the movie was
"Dad's leave. No reason to be a ***** about it"
I loved that because I thought we were about to go down a really lame melodramatic moment. But the response was perfect Tony and the way the kid tried to guilt-trip him at the end to. Awesome way to go about that.
Friend of mine who I saw it with's dad left him and his family a couple years ago, and that line had him in stitches. He was doubled over laughing. It sort of surprised me since it's still a sensitive issue with him, but he loved that part.