SentinelMind
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2004
- Messages
- 4,056
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I don't understand........what is a "fair" price for your script...what is the compensation that you "deserve" for your "art"?
This is all determined by the market. You might think you deserve more for your skill,....your boss might say you deserve less......who's right? Both of you may have subjective opinions, but in the end of the day, the market should decide that.
Lot of posters here are putting out lot of assumption about their talent,...that their ideas in their script are "one of a kind" .......so much higher quality that ...if that's the case...why are the writers getting easily replaced? If their talent can't be replaced, the boss would have a hard time getting rid of them. But the supply is high...everyone thinks their art, their script, etc...etc....is the bomb and deserves high compensation....the bosses don't think so, and the consumers could care less....
With the analogy comparing Tchaikovsky to Paris Hilton.....more people may prefer to buy the latter. I can understand someone saying the former is higher quality. I might agree with you. But at the end of the day, if you're in the business of making art FOR PROFIT....not for the LOVE of art. You can be like Picasso and paint beautiful art and be practically homeless....his art wasn't appreciated much later after his death, probably by someone who was already rich and influenced the market demand. You can't ask a business that is trying to make art....to just subsidize you for the "love of art". That's what the government is for......
I can't stand listening to people who go into entertainment industry "for the love of the art"...but then whine about proper compensation....you're in it for money, just like everyone else..
This is all determined by the market. You might think you deserve more for your skill,....your boss might say you deserve less......who's right? Both of you may have subjective opinions, but in the end of the day, the market should decide that.
Lot of posters here are putting out lot of assumption about their talent,...that their ideas in their script are "one of a kind" .......so much higher quality that ...if that's the case...why are the writers getting easily replaced? If their talent can't be replaced, the boss would have a hard time getting rid of them. But the supply is high...everyone thinks their art, their script, etc...etc....is the bomb and deserves high compensation....the bosses don't think so, and the consumers could care less....
With the analogy comparing Tchaikovsky to Paris Hilton.....more people may prefer to buy the latter. I can understand someone saying the former is higher quality. I might agree with you. But at the end of the day, if you're in the business of making art FOR PROFIT....not for the LOVE of art. You can be like Picasso and paint beautiful art and be practically homeless....his art wasn't appreciated much later after his death, probably by someone who was already rich and influenced the market demand. You can't ask a business that is trying to make art....to just subsidize you for the "love of art". That's what the government is for......
I can't stand listening to people who go into entertainment industry "for the love of the art"...but then whine about proper compensation....you're in it for money, just like everyone else..