Lactophiliac said:Well on the topic of roles for black actors, Morgan Freeman seems to be able to get roles that weren't written for black characters, in the novels of both Shawshank Redemption and Dreamcatcher the characters he played in the films were white. No I suppose they may have written them for the screen with the idea of getting a black character to play the part, but I dunno.
Cinemaman said:Chicago didn't deserve Oscar Award, I thought The Pianist had been MUCH BETTER movie![]()
Movies205 said:I thought Chicago was great, I don't mean to be condescending, but do you say that cuz you don't like musicals or because you really think Pianist was a better movie. You have to judge Chicago as a musical, and musicals are not deep cinema fair but that doesn't make them any less in terms of genres, depth is not a measurement of greatness, just look at "Wizard of Oz"(Though I loathe this film)
Cinemaman said:I do like musicals (not so many), but Chicago was just good movie, not great IMO.
The Pianist was one of the best movies'02 for me, it really deserved Oscar Award for Best Motion Picture.
You must be joking. Denzel thoroughly deserved his Oscar in my opnion.His performance was amazing no s**tty rapper-turned-actor could do a better job.Carmine Falcone said:His performance in Training Day is nothing special. Every rapper can play the tough crooked cop. Seriously. it is not exceptional in any way.
Them too? Wow.Movies205 said:Mgiht as well add Robert Altman, Hitchcock, Sydney Lumet, and Blake Edwards to that roll call![]()
Agreed.Dr. MIX said:The color purple was indeed robbed at the oscars, I laughed at the idea of Oprah being an actress beforehand, but once I saw it, boy can that woman act! She's the character I felt and cared for the most. Hugely surprised![]()
Chicago was good but didn't deserve so many awards in my opnion. A little bit overrated.Cinemaman said:Chicago didn't deserve Oscar Award, I thought The Pianist had been MUCH BETTER movie![]()
Movies205 said:I can agree, but I don't think it was robbed, it was close since Chicago was a really well made film. And again this is why I put more stock in nominations than in actual wins, because 95% the time Academy Awards is spot on with it's nominations.
Retroman said:Chicago was good but didn't deserve so many awards in my opnion. A little bit overrated.
Cinemaman said:Agreed.
Movies205 said:Did anyone else feel it was slighty wierd/wrong how Jamie Foxx got nominated for support actor in Collateral when he was obviously the main actor... I mean it's a great performance but it was like a cop-out sot hey could nominate more people...
Movies205 said:Big Lewboski, John Goodman, did an amazing performance at the very least I figure he should of gotten a nomination.
mister Lennon said:by the way , Kate Hudson was nominated in the supporting actress cathegory , not in the main actress cathegory.
mister Lennon said:Both were nominated for best supporting actress, take a look here:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181875/awards
Movies205 said:Do the Right Thing is great, I need to see Malcom X and Boyz n' the Hood since I'm a fan of both Spike Lee and John Singleton. But I'm really interested in seeing Bamboozled but I hear it can get pretencious at times.
P.S. Cmil, your a cool guy![]()