I'm giving Marvel the benefit of the doubt because the last MCU film featuring comedy directors turned out very well.
It happened to be these guys:
![]()
Difference being those guys were hired like a year before filming began.
I'm giving Marvel the benefit of the doubt because the last MCU film featuring comedy directors turned out very well.
It happened to be these guys:
![]()
I take it you mean Hank Pym the first Ant-Man and not Scott Lang the second Ant-Man?
While Hank Pym has had a inferiority complex he isn't always the serious character people make him out to be. Like any character who has been around for 50 years there are light hearted moments as well as the darker more serious ones.
The 60's setting was only going to be in the prologue in Edgar's movie but perhaps that might change with Reed aboard.
Yeah Hank Pym is the only Ant-Man I've ever read featured in a story from the ultimates to the Avengers. I'm sure there have been a ton of iterations but there is a few that most people would generally agree are the best.
I'm just glad this age of directorlessness is over.
He directed a film called YES MAN. Aha so appropriate.
Another lackey for Marvel. These guys run a studio like Hollywood did 50 years ago. Crazy.
I'm glad the film is back on track. With Peyton Reed it's clear they've slid way down the comedy director totem pole, he's no Edgar Wright. But he's competent, he has credits under his belt, and he's a director, so the film isn't in limbo anymore, which is good.
I think more encouraging is Adam McKay being hired to write the script. Given how many of the reports have talked about the weak script from in-house writers, it's a positive sign that Marvel are addressing that. McKay is no slouch, and though his scripts have a lot of ad-libbing from actors, he does have some chops, and his own distinct identity. A strong script is the foundation of a strong film, and as much as I love Wright, it's probably best for the film that this doesn't feel too much like another director making Wright's film.
I wonder if they'll recast everyone. And how the plot will fit in the MCU.
Meh...I just can't get excited about this movie anymore. I hope this flops, so Marvel learns their lesson and doesn't allow something like this to happen again. This film being successful will only be bad for Marvel fans in the long run.
What is Peyton Reed's visual flair? I'm curious because I'm not familiar with him.
Talk about childish.
Why do you hope this film flops? It's not like it would be a huge blockbuster under Wright. A superhero movie with no supervillans.Actually it's the opposite of that. I don't want childish ****** films controlled by Disney and Marvel that hire yes men directors(pun intended). The way Marvel conducts business is scaring the talented people behind the cameras in Hollywood away.
Actually it's the opposite of that. I don't want childish ****** films controlled by Disney and Marvel that hire yes men directors(pun intended). The way Marvel conducts business is scaring the talented people behind the cameras in Hollywood away.
Yeah, because Shane Black and James Gunn were yes man. Oh wait ......
God anymore overreactions for me?
Your statements make you not childish, but more along the lines of being snobbish/greedy in wanting a straight Wright movie that happened to use Marvel characters instead of a Marvel movie that happened to have Wright as director. As for scaring away talented people, I'd say Marvel still can attract/find talent if it wants to. Working for them may not be for every one, but if they can work with someone like James Gunn, then it's not impossible to get eccentric or artistic people working on their movies.Actually it's the opposite of that. I don't want childish ****** films controlled by Disney and Marvel that hire yes men directors(pun intended). The way Marvel conducts business is scaring the talented people behind the cameras in Hollywood away.