• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Porn

Logan's Runt said:
Plenty of people have beat you to that. :o

There are three I can think of by name, who also have done away with the 'no penetration' stipulation, but still bank on the niche SG created.
Click to expand...

DAMMIT! :cmad: Hmmm....my site would be infinitely more kinky than any of my competitors, though. Viva la difference! :up:

jag
 
Someone wanted to masterbate on your feet? and you were up for it? you not feel that thats kinda degrading (even though you may have been fully clothed he's still ejaculating on your feet) That said you may see it from the point of view that he's willing to pay for it so your in the more powerful (so to speak) position.

If your willing to do that if the money was right (while i accept it not the same) and your husband was ok with it, would you do porn?

How far did you actually go in your SG photoshoot, what did you show? Is your husband ok with all this and had you been (or if you already were) together at the time would he have been fine with someone ejaculating on your feet?

If im being too nosey tell me to sod off, im just curious. :)
 
Logan's Runt said:
I was paid $300 for about 40 pictures, but the standard price recently went up to $500.

Being an SG tends to open up a lot of opportunities for making more money by selling things to members, some of which will buy anything an SG has touches. I was offered a whole lot of money by someone who wanted to *********e on my feet. If I'd believed he was serious, I would have done it. :up:



I think spreadshots are gross, too. I prefer a little playful mystery or a peek so much more.

I'm glad I was able to make it in before standards went up, too. I'd love to take another set, but I haven't found the time to put together what it takes nowadays, and there aren't any staff togs around me. :down

Was the special you saw the RealSex one? That's the only one I've seen, and it was really nifty.

Something you'll find while reading about SG is a lot of controversy and hate-sites. I'm always surprised at how vehemently people can hate a website. As with any business you'll get people who dislike the business practices or have disagreements with the staff and go on a vendetta against them. I don't really know how much truth there is to any of the rumors, but I've never had any of those problems.
Click to expand...

Ah!That reminds me of one of my friends who had such a big foot fetish he did, in fact, *********e onto his girlfriend's feet. She broke up with him after that. :hehe:

I honestly don't remember if it was RealSex or not. Isn't RealSex an HBO thing? The Special I saw was on Showtime. I'll look it up really quick...

As far as controversies, someone will always ***** about something, legit or not. Reading the Wiki page some of the things are bizarre...especially the Nazi imagery, but people just need to get over it and move on.
 
The-Dark-Knight said:
Someone wanted to masterbate on your feet? and you were up for it? you not feel that thats kinda degrading (even though you may have been fully clothed he's still ejaculating on your feet) That said you may see it from the point of view that he's willing to pay for it so your in the more powerful (so to speak) position.

If your willing to do that if the money was right (while i accept it not the same) and your husband was ok with it, would you do porn?

How far did you actually go in your SG photoshoot, what did you show? Is your husband ok with all this and had you been (or if you already were) together at the time would he have been fine with someone ejaculating on your feet?

If im being too nosey tell me to sod off, im just curious. :)
Click to expand...

No, not nosy, don't worry about it. I wouldn't mention this stuff if I was skittish about talking about it.

I don't really find it degrading. I'm a stranger to this person, so I don't expect him to respect me for who I am inside because he doesn't know anything about that. Its just an agreement that he finds my feet aesthetically attractive and wants to derive pleasure for that. The power aspect has little to do with it for me, thought I wouldn't really mind being a dominatrix for the money it brings.

I've never really considered doing porn, as there's a line of intimacy for me personally there that I'm not comfortable crossing. But, there are girls who don't have that personal hangup and its fine for them. There are also girls who have a line at having their feet *********ed on, haha. I have considered stripping, but its actually a lot of work and I'm lazy. :o

My husband was my photographer for my set, and when I brought up the prospect of SG, he sheepishly admitted that he'd thought about suggesting it previously, but was worried I'd be offended. He separates intimacy and helping other people derive pleasure in much the same way that I do, so it doesn't bother him. He was also even more alright with the *********ion feet thing than I was. I was cautious because of the anominity of the internet and worrying that we'd get scammed as it was a ridiculous amount of money for three seconds worth of orgasm. He simply saw it as contributing to the betterment of the world by furthering pleasure, even if it turned out to not be the actual amount of money the guy was offering.

I was pretty conservative as far as showing 'pink' in my set, because I was newish to being naked in front of an audience, but there are peeks here and there. I think its tasteful, but that's subjective. Lots of titays and ass, though. :o

I think I've actually posted a couple pictures from my set here, which were hype-safe. We're allowed to have two 'teaser' photos from our set posted elsewhere without violating copyright as an advertisement.

Nirvana said:
Ah!That reminds me of one of my friends who had such a big foot fetish he did, in fact, *********e onto his girlfriend's feet. She broke up with him after that. :hehe:

I honestly don't remember if it was RealSex or not. Isn't RealSex an HBO thing? The Special I saw was on Showtime. I'll look it up really quick...

As far as controversies, someone will always ***** about something, legit or not. Reading the Wiki page some of the things are bizarre...especially the Nazi imagery, but people just need to get over it and move on.
Click to expand...

Yeah, its a very common thing with the feet. I've stepped in worse things with barefeet, and they do wash up very well. :o

Yeah, the controversies get pretty hilarious sometimes. Dealing with the amount of members and models that they do, you've got to expect that kind of thing.
 
So.. umm... *shuffles feet*... you showed your.... your... breasts? :ninja:
 
....... So, Suicide Girls was it?
 
I think Hype frowns on linking to those types of sites, anyway. It's not like it's hard to find though.
 
You can't see her pics without paying for a site membership.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Alex_Spider
Is porn corrupting society?
16 17 18
Replies
438
Views
27K
DA_Champion
DA_Champion
Whirlysplat
Porn suspect 'targeted' UK girls
Replies
1
Views
935
War Lord
War Lord
jaguarr
.XXX Domain Squashed
Replies
15
Views
2K
THWIP*
THWIP*
kainedamo
Age gap - why can't girls stick to their own age?
10 11 12
Replies
276
Views
13K
Wilhelm-Scream
Wilhelm-Scream
SoulManX
Sony, Shunning Porn Producers, May Hurt Blu-ray Sales
2 3
Replies
69
Views
6K
Fran
F

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 2,782 (members: 29, guests: 2,753)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,256
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"