Quentin Tarantino's Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

[jolldan]

How have I not heard about this earlier?

 

[samsnee]

Poster looks fine. Brad is a little photoshopped but it's obvious they are banking on the faces and QT's name.

 

[Sawyer]

Poster is boring as ****, but let's be honest, a boring poster isn't changing anything for any of us.

 

[I Am The Knight]

Love Leo doing the "movie-star stare" bit. Can't wait to see more.

 

[OutOfBoose]

How can you look at a poster like that and not want to see this?

The poster is really bland.

 

[samsnee]

Agreed. Creatively it’s saying all we need to show you are famous faces so you’ll see it anyways.

 

[Da-Scribe]

I mean it's Leo and Pitt in a QT film. That's a massive part of the hype for me, so this poster does the trick.

 

[titansupes]

Plus, isn't it just the teaser poster? With a theatrical poster coming closer to release? If so, does its job.

 

[Stringer]

It may be bland but it's better than the default characters poorly stacked on each other like the Avengers one.

 

[Holiday]

Brad’s look is interesting.

It's like the low quality you see on some DVD covers.

 

[Marvolo]

Poster is boring as ****, but let's be honest, a boring poster isn't changing anything for any of us.

I dont even need a trailer. Its Tarantino. I dont need to know anything else.

 

[Greens]

The poster is terrible. It doesn't affect my excitement but it's annoying how multi-million dollar companies keep crapping out stuff like this.

 

[DarkKnight88]

Tarantino has always been very hands-on with the marketing to his movies. If anything, this is the exact poster he wanted.

 

[THE WOLF]

 

[Doctor Jones]

That doesn't even look like Margo Robbie.

Nice to see the Westwood Theater though. Though that looks even more photoshopped. It looks like it was done in ten minutes.

 

[HammerDown]

These posters leave a lot to be desired. I get that they are stars, Leo, Brad Pitt and Margot Robbie... but the posters do need something more to them otherwise they are boring.

 

[antsman41]

Yeah... most of QT posters are interesting or neat.

These are bland character promos at best.

 

[KaijuDude1992]

The posters are whatever IMO. Doesn't hurt my excitement for the movie either way. I'm just waiting for that trailer to drop.

 

[Sawyer]

That Sharon Tate poster is a relief. If these are just character posters, then I think I can forgive how basic they are and assume there's something that's the real deal on the way.

 

[OutOfBoose]

Better. Much better.

 

[3rdstone]

I would never had guessed that was Margot Robbie. I agree with folks here, these posters isn't that exciting, but as character promos they still kinda work IMO. At least there's no "floating heads" lol.

And of course I'm looking forward to this flick as hell.

 

[The Shape]

What is she leaning against? I think we have ourselves a mystery.

 

[Black Narcissus]

What is she leaning against?

The backs of all the folks in this thread who wanted to cancel QT and this movie.

 

[Black Narcissus]

Teaser coming tomorrow, allegedly. Don't shoot the messenger.

 

[Kane52630]

So interesting that QT is doing a romcom... never would have guessed it.