If that's true WB have been really dumb by trying to misrepresent Fisher's interaction with the investigation team.
They're not misrepresenting his interaction. He has, thus far, absolutely refused to cooperate with the investigation. He admitted that he refused to continue a statement.
He seems to be doing this on his own and to be a little in over his head, as it doesn't appear that he has an attorney, because no attorney would allow him into a statement scenario without explaining things fully.
The deeper we get into this, the more he strikes me as one of those people who thinks they can handle everything themselves, without really understanding the processes involved.
He isn't covering his tracks well either. How did he know the investigator has been "definitely put on the case by WB, not Warner Media"? Or where his findings would "directly" go to? Let's take Ray's word for it and assume the investigator truly didn't represent Warner Media, how did Ray instantly learn that during their brief Zoom call? The investigator obviously won't be telling him any of that if he wanted to trick him into believing that he was an actual 3rd party investigator. So how did Ray know.
He was probably asked to give a statement. People get jump when things are going to be recorded.
This is deeper than the what the surface indicates. Nobody here are investigators. Front row seats, though. WB is going to try to bury it the best of their abilities.
(Raises hand) I am. Was, at least. It really feels like he got scared off when asked to record his statement or somethign along those lines.
Still not sure how exactly did Fisher instantly know that guy was an "IN HOUSE, BIAS INVESTIGATOR". How did he learn that after only having a brief Zoom call with him. He literally says in that email that he "definitely" works for WB. What did that guy say to him that made him instantly reach that conclusion. Shouldn't he elaborate more on that part to give his claim a little more credibility.
It doesn't matter, because the only thing an investigator can do is obtain Ray's own statement.
Most third party investigators just aren't biased. They're paid not to be, and they just don't care.
I wondered about that too. And presumably it was a scheduled call. I hope Ray knows better to vet the parties involved beforehand, and he should have legal counsel or are least a witness present regardless who hired the investigators for his own protection.
I don't think he has legal counsel. At least he didn't, at the time. Legal counsel wouldn't have allowed him into that situation.