Yes this is a post of me taken out of context...would have been nice if you would have used the post i responded to too.
As for context, which you arent interested in, this was in response to a post Mr. E Nygma made that indicated that it has to do with pride and that WB NEEDS to apologize.
To which my response then was what you quoted, the whole post of me was about the whole idea that it is all a pride thing...therefore my question too, why it is not Fisher who swallows his pride when allegedly its not about trivial things.
He's been naming the same names and specifying his issues with leadership for almost a year. You really need him to clarify it still? We're all mature enough to infer who he's talking about and understand that he isn't attacking a company's entire roster of tens of thousands of employees.
He accused people of Racism and more(even if it is directed at Whedon the dirtbag)...so yeah i expect him to state clearly and not fumble around.
Because he created the narrative of being clear and then he constantly makes vague accusations etc.
He was the one who started this all with wanting to change Hollywood as a whole, making his A>E thing something huge...and he has in the past referred to WB as a whole.
And recently he directly spoke about the people he meant, so when he suddenly @ the whole company in a company wide stance...then i assume he means the whole company, because he had no problem before to be very specific in talking about the leadership and so on.
He said he didn't want to work with Hamada because he felt Hamada enabled abuse. WB then let him go under the guise of a resignation. Ray's tweet was not a resignation, which he said himself. But anyone with common sense that has been responsible for staffing could tell you that. And any employer who gives even half a **** about their employees would have formally investigated the claims against Hamada before re-upping his contract and firing Fisher. But WarnerMedia was more interested in moving on from the whole thing, which they made explicitly clear in the trades.
Again, all unproven...are there any documents that support those claims or not?
Because if not then it is a disgruntled ex worker being upset.
Again, all im asking here is just clear proof...and all people come up with is "fisher said".
If this is all so clear, why isnt there to any of this factual proof and just hearsay?
If that is enough for some, then fine...but i dont see why i need to do the same.
I need proof, factual hard proof to be able to come to a conclussion.
I dont want to believe stuff because "someone said it", like i said...i have done so too much in the past and fell on my ass on that front.
Where did he say he'd never work for WB? He said he didn't want to work with Hamada. He then said he'd be willing to see where things go if WB can apologize.
See, alone that shows that A>E isnt as high of a priority for him.
Because if it were, he wouldnt be "willing to see" unless Hamada is gone.
But instead he is willing to see where it goes as long as he can get a forced apology.
That is not what someone does who really wants to make things better for everyone, if he wanted, he wouldnt be willing unless Hamada is gone from his position of power.
Are you that careful though? You've suggested that Snyder manipulated Ray into alleging abuse over the JL reshoots. Zero proof. You've claimed that Ray wants everyone at WB to bow to him. Zero proof. You've said 99% of people at WarnerMedia support diversity. Zero proof. You even alleged a POC may have drafted the tweet about George Floyd. And again, zero proof.
So it seems this need for proof only exists when it isn't you making the claims.
Cant say that i remember stating any of this as fact, i constantly use the words "may, could, probably, might etc" to avoid exactly that.
If i do mess up and say something that sounds like im stating it as fact when its not, then i apologize, happens in the heat of the moment but that doesnt make it okay.
Normally i try to be as careful as possible to not state unproven things as facts.
