manofsteel4life
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,516
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Yea me to..., that and maybe Pa kent dying..but I guess we'll see how this all plays out
So what ever happened to Jimmy Olsen?
If she is meant to be a permanent replacement for Jimmy in this franchise, I'm going to be heavily dissapointed.
well so far she is the ONLY Olsen in this movie
Or made that character better.If things stay that way, I will be very pissed and dissapointed. They would be removing an important supporting character...just because.
It is stupidly unnecessary.
Or made that character better.
Yeah, I'm not the biggest fan of Jimmy being changed to Jenny. My favourite interpretation of Jimmy is as Clark/Superman's one true real friend. I'm not saying that a heterosexual man can't have a meaningful platonic friendship with a heterosexual woman, but Hollywood never seems to allow that to happen. Chloe from Smallville is the perfect example of that. They never let her and Clark truly be platonic friends. She started off having a crush on him and being friend-zoned by his love for Lana and they messed around with the idea of them together a little bit. I just feel like there is a better chance of them not screwing up the Jimmy-Clark relationship if they just left him a heterosexual man. There would be less of temptation for the writers to add in something romantic between Jenny and Clark or something in a sequel for unnecessary romantic drama.
That is the thing though, it takes away from Jimmy's relationship to Clark if you make Jenny a more Lois-centric character. Also, if this film is about Clark/Superman finally finding a home/acceptance, then the idea of him finally finding a true friend in Jimmy is especially meaningful. I mean Clark doesn't seem to have fit in as a child. The Junior Novel really underlines that fact and even Pete Ross has been re-imagined as one of his bullies. I know Clark will be finding larger acceptance as Superman, but I really like the idea of him finding acceptance at the Planet. It is a great way to show the theme of modern cities being big, diverse communities where everyone has a place and a group of people who are like them. They might pull that off with Jenny, but as I mentioned in my post above, I have little faith in Hollywood being able to handle platonic male-female relationships successfully.
Moreover, it is probably more empowering for Lois if Jimmy/Jenny looks up to her and is a man. It means that Lois is not just a role model for other women but that she has transcended gender boundaries and is a role model for all aspiring journalists.
Oh well. As long as they do a job with the relationships, I'll be happy. I just think it could have been better the other way around.
I have to agree on the gender issue. There is a certain difference in a friendly relationship where you know that both of you will never be attracted to each other. I have plenty of platonic female friends and I'm in a committed relationship, but even still, the "what if?" thought will pop into my head just out of curiosity. But maybe, I'm just an oversexed young man like DaJanksta.
As I argued below, it is hard to see how:
I know to some being upset over changing Jimmy's gender seems like sexist, kneejerk reactions, but there are a lot of legitimate reasons to be concerned.
All of it conjecture at this point.As I argued below, it is hard to see how:
I know to some being upset over changing Jimmy's gender seems like sexist, kneejerk reactions, but there are a lot of legitimate reasons to be concerned.
As I argued below, it is hard to see how:
I know to some being upset over changing Jimmy's gender seems like sexist, kneejerk reactions, but there are a lot of legitimate reasons to be concerned.
It feels like they're changing stuff just for the sake of changing stuff. That's what this whole thing feels like to me.
She'll probably have like 5 mins screen time tops. The change does not bother me. Then again, the Olsen character has never really been that important to me.
This is me. I've never cared about Jimmy in...any incarnation of Supes that I can recall, so it doesn't phase me at all either way. But for those who DO care about Jimmy, I can see where they're coming from. If they'd done this with a character I was a fan of, I'd be a little annoyed by it as well.The change does not bother me. Then again, the Olsen character has never really been that important to me.
I doubt that. She seems to be in every piece of Daily Planet footage released so far, front and center with Perry.
Maybe so, but 5 mins of screen time is a lot, when you actually think about it.
Just for kicks: Anthony Hopkins had 16 mins of screen time in Silence of the Lambs. Anne Hathaway had about 15 mins in Les Mis. Judy Dench 8 mins in Shakespeare in Love.....I'm guessing Olsen won't be as important to the plot as those other roles.
Has this been confirmed? I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is true. I would like to see some proof.
Yes. There's a photo with a caption 'Jenny Olsen'.Has this been confirmed? I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is true. I would like to see some proof.
True, but I wasn't taking you as meaning a literal 5 minutes tops. I was responding to your argument which read as "it doesn't really matter because she will barely be in the film". I was responding that based on what we've seen, she appears to be a prominent Daily Planet character and always in frame with Perry.
So what ever happened to Jimmy Olsen?
If she is meant to be a permanent replacement for Jimmy in this franchise, I'm going to be heavily dissapointed.