Willie Lumpkin
Trophy Husband
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2003
- Messages
- 13,822
- Reaction score
- 2,192
- Points
- 103
It's weird because I see it directly opposite.
I see them as a family first, with all the dynamics and problems of being a family...AND they are a superhero group as well and those things collide sometimes. IMO, that is what makes them different from all of the other superheros out there....the family dynamic is key. I think "The Incredibles" did an excellent job of melting the two together. I actually felt they were more of a family than the F4 movies.
My problem with the first and second movie was because...they didn't feel like a family.....at all, and that was my biggest gripe. Hell, they didn't even act like they liked each other. They had much more chemistry off screen than on.
I think there may be a number of ideas being co-mingled here. In terms of priorities, they are a family first. It is clearly who they are, and it's vital that concept is maintained.
That being said, what do we want to see in those precious 90 minutes? I want to know they're a family and that those things are important, but the primary conflict shouldn't come from their family issues. The primary conflict that keeps the viewer on the edge of his/her seat wondering what will happen next should be the potentially dire events of a well-crafted plot - not Reed and Sue's china pattern.
I think the incredibles is a good example because I do think that Brad Bird did a better job of balancing the broader story with the conflicts within the family than either FF film did. You and I are probably not that far off with our thinking, but the semantics may be confusing.
Any film or book is a slice of life of the characters involved. The writer needs to think about what slice they give their audience. If we wanted to make an entertaining film about Richard Nixon, would we focus on his time at Duke Law School, or would we want to look at his vice-presidency, his 1968 campaign for president, his work with China, Watergate, his fall from grace, etc.?
I'm sure that his time at law school was very important to him and helped to mold who he was, but (unless the film-maker was very talented) it likely wouldn't be the most interesting story we could tell about him. And even if we decide we're going to focus on Watergate, we need to decide what elements are critical and need to be specifically shown and what elements are there - beneath the surface - but only suggested or hinted at. I believe that Tim Story spent far too much screen time showing us things about the character's personal conflicts that could have been accomplished with a brief glance or nod and been not only effective, but in some cases more effective than what we saw.
And the source material - the comic books - clearly follow that principle. We know these characters because over 40 years their characters were well developed with pieces here and pieces there. But 80% of any FF comic book you pick up will be focused on a major story - not the individual conflicts (though those individual conflicts are always there affecting the broader story).
I can tell you that if I had picked up an FF comic book as a 5 year old boy and found that 80% of it was devoted to 'family problems and conflicts' . . . I probably wouldn't have picked up another, and I wouldn't be here now.
Last edited: