Reintroducing Superman: An Open Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Venom'sDad said:
Besides, the reason for introducing Krypton/Jor-El in the beginning is to established the "gift" to humanity and set up future threats and/or villains for future films(sequels).

I really have a distaste for the idea that Superman is Jor-el's gift to humanity and or the whole "destiny" of Superman. Joe-el's sole gift was the gift of life to his son.

"Humanity" should be portrayed as quite capable on it's own, it does not need a saviour. Superman is a valuable member of the Earth team to be sure, but he is not the only player on the field.
 
I really have a distaste for the idea that Superman is Jor-el's gift to humanity and or the whole "destiny" of Superman. Joe-el's sole gift was the gift of life to his son.

"Humanity" should be portrayed as quite capable on it's own, it does not need a saviour. Superman is a valuable member of the Earth team to be sure, but he is not the only player on the field.
Fair enough, neitherless, Superman is looked upon as a blessing, a gift to humanity. Out of all the places Jor-El could have sent him.
 
I wasn't implying that the next Superman movie should only cost 30mil, as it was obvious that District 9 had things working for it that most movies don't, but I still think that it is dumb that the new running budgets for blockbusters is 175 to 250mil.

I understand what you are saying but I refuse to believe that it is impossible to make a blockbuster for 150mil in 2009. And yes I know it isn't easy to keep the budget down and yeah I know it's hard to make movies.

Stars don't even really matter as much as they use to, I wonder when Hollywood is going to figure that out? They are just wasting money right there with paying Z-grades A- grade prices.

I'm not lumping in the marketing with the cost of the film because those aren't exactly the same thing.

So let me just simply sum it up:

A special effects movie will always cost a s**tload for the reasons you say but (and I could be wrong, after all I don't work in the biz) I still don't think that it's impossible to make a special effects picture for under 175mil.

1) First of all i agree wih when it comes to movie stars taking up alot of the budget. I think it was Favreau who , when making Iron Man , said that Iron Man was the 20 million star not the actor playim him. I think that applies for several of these franchise movies. Superman , Batman etc.
I think this is can be partially blamed on the studios as well. You get an actor pay him a million or two to star in a movie and for some reason the movie performs extremely well. Enter the hollywood agent demanding much more for the next sequel. It's not unheard of. Look at Tobey Maguire and Shia Leboeff . After Spidey 1 and TF 1 their agents demanded a massive salary increase of 20 million for the sequel. The studios of course denied that but renegotiated their deals so that the actors still got a substantial pay increase.

Although i do feel that actor play a (big) role in a movie's success , there are other factors as well. Why not simply work for a small salary (a couple of mil) and when the movie becomes a hit , you'll get your share of the gross. I think that's a scenario everyone is happy. Once the studio has recouped it's costs , everyone can have a percentage of the profits . It worked with guys like Spielberg , Lucas and Ford when they made Indiana Jones 4.

2) Your point about making a massive blockbuster for less then 175 million. Again you are right in saying that it is possible. However along with the reasons Crook has listed ( shooting stuff for real , shooting on real locations etc) one of the factors that also plays a big role in the budget increase is the fact that studios are trying to get a movie done in shorter timeframes.
I guess that's due to the fact that the actors are getting older.
However in order to get the VFX shots done in( a shorter) time , the studio has to pay million in over time. That certainly was the case with the POTC sequels .
I know , it's a pretty ******ed idea to actually set a release date but meanwhile your behind with your post.prod work.
I guess that with franchises it's more to do with the fact that the actors are getting older . Making the movies faster means that the actors can play the roles for a longer period of time . But you need to seriously pay loads more to get everything done.
Heck i could see what everyone's is saying about Star Trek's budget actually being bigger then what is reported.

Movies like LOTR and the matrix movies have shown the the budgets can be lowered substantially and still be able to deliver high end VFX shots. But your talking about a longer period of time to develop everything.
Are studios and actors willing to wait for such a long period ?
Compare Minority Report and War Of The Worlds. Both movies directed by Spielberg , both movies star Tom Cruise. I'm sure he asked for his usual 20 million pay day on both flicks. In terms is VFX , Minority Report is bigger . Yet is costs less then War Of The Worlds. Aside from the fact that War Of The Worlds was shot on more real locations then Minority Report , SPielberg reallly took his time to make Minority Report .
War Of the Worlds was made in 9 months , from start to finish. Minority Report had a post. prod period of a whole year.
 
That bullit train idea is great and since the plane and helicopter are taken its probably the best way to go. I really like the idea of manuevering around trees and stopping it in sections.

In terms of the origin, for me, I couldnt care less about starting on krypton but I think you have to start with lois and clarks first meeting and him starting at the daily planet to establish the characters and create that interesting dynamic that people like. At the heart of it is lois and clarks relationship, which as much as we all like action, I think people enjoy that aspect, seeing as how they created a whole show based on it.

Its good to see that most are agreeing on this.
 
I don't care for Kal-Marts initial introduction of Clark Kent all that much, as I think it's a bit too "there", but I do like the idea of seeing Superman right off the bat, establishing him as a mythic, strange presence, and then going from there, with bits of the origin throughout the film. That's the approach I took, and think should be taken, naturally. :).

I will say...even those ideas have been done somewhere. I've seen that scenario time and time again. There's very little that hasn't been done that remains faithful to the Superman mythology. That's not a bad thing, and honoring some of those elements wouldn't be bad either. Frankly, SUPERMAN RETURNS had some fairly fresh ideas, and people disliked a number of them, so...it's about being faithful and not redundant, I think, more than just coming up with something "fresh".

If you like his ideas, you'd all probably like my SUPERMAN STARTS script. I wish it wasn't on my virus-ridden laptop with CAPTAIN AMERICA and THE SPECTRE.

(Tear).

I have GOT to stop coming here. Every time I do, I want to write a Superman script again, and I'm working on real projects now.

Someone write one for me so the pressure will be off.
 
Last edited:
While I agree that SUPERMAN RETURNS was detailed, and Singer did go the extra mile...that film didn't cost so much because of corn and shooting on location. It cost so much because it was just MASSIVE in scale, and had a ridiculous amount of CGI and effects work in it.
 
While I agree that SUPERMAN RETURNS was detailed, and Singer did go the extra mile...that film didn't cost so much because of corn and shooting on location. It cost so much because it was just MASSIVE in scale, and had a ridiculous amount of CGI and effects work in it.
where was it massive in scale?

plane scene? ohh yes. one of the best action comicbook rescue scene of all time IMO.

but other stuff? i dont think so.
 
Someone write one for me so the pressure will be off.


SUPERMAN: VIRUS
by Motown Marvel

Brainiac came to earth and put a virus in Guard's computer. Superman didn't care and did nothing to stop it. Guard cried. Superman and Brainiac went off to windsor to get some poutine.

The End.
 
do what TIH did...tell the origin in the opening credits...if you are over the age of 10 and you don't know that Superman comes from another planet, you shouldn't even be in the theater

-Have Superman as a presence in Metropolis, have him a foil a robbery or something right at the start...this is why I suggest using Metallo....Supes can stop a robbery by John Corben and his gang and the story can move forward

-Clark and Lois should just be working together at this point, no dating, no marriage...just co-workers

-Lex should be a background player and have LexCorp established as a legitimate company...make Lex the DC equivalent of a Bill Gates or Steve Jobs (in the public eye)
 
A modernization of THIS should be Superman's grand debut.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkElf1KtaBs

Seriously, a plane catch ain't got nothing on Superman vs. GIANT FRIGGIN' ROBOTS! Also, the robots could be the could be the creations of Dr. Emmit Vale, who afterwards gets hired by Lex Luthor to turn John Corbin into Metallo using the experimental "Metal 10" alloy (which in this movie would likely be Kryptonian in origin).
 
what is with people and the Fleischer cartoons?? ugh...I like them, but let's not live in the past people
 
what is with people and the Fleischer cartoons?? ugh...I like them, but let's not live in the past people

They're good. Greatly animated but obviously, a product of its time (like the Japanese episode.).

The problem is that, what made them work is their simplicity, and it was okay for them because they were made back in the 40s. Superman has evolved a lot since then, and I'll be honest, I've watch the majority of the epsidoes, and I actually missed Lex Luthor.
 
what is with people and the Fleischer cartoons?? ugh...I like them, but let's not live in the past people

Superman also catches a plane in a Fleischer cartoon........so every depiction of a plane rescue is living in the past?

Isn't Metallo akin to a mechanical monster?
 
SUPERMAN: VIRUS
by Motown Marvel

Brainiac came to earth and put a virus in Guard's computer. Superman didn't care and did nothing to stop it. Guard cried. Superman and Brainiac went off to windsor to get some poutine.

The End.

Fantastic.
 
The opening sequence is a trip through the Universe, there's a fairly sizeable spaceship crash, the plane/shuttle rescue was a huge sequence, New Krypton is pretty grand scale, there's some sizeable action on a boat, Superman lifted a continent at one point, and a yacht, multiple scenes on said yacht, The Daily Planet, etc. You had him flying, leaping around through cornfields, the Kent Farm was pretty big, tearing around through Metropolis firing things from his eyes, a decent number of explosions, a gunfight with a giant machine gun, etc. Decent runaway car sequence, scenes in The Fortress, which itself was huge. Flying through Metropolis with Lois, doing various fairly large scale things around the world. Superman lacked kinetic action in some sense, and much in the way of combat, but it wasn't lacking in scale or action in general.

And that's without his time on Krypton. If the Krypton scenes had made it into the movie, the scale would have been even BIGGER.

Put all that together, even without the Krypton stuff, and that's a pretty grand scale compared to, oh...almost anything.

SUPERMAN RETURNS was a huge film.
 
Last edited:
Superman also catches a plane in a Fleischer cartoon........so every depiction of a plane rescue is living in the past?

Isn't Metallo akin to a mechanical monster?

There were also Fleischer cartoons involving criminals flying around the city with advanced technology (a la Intergang), a giant gorilla run amok (a la Titano), and even an impostor Superman running around causing trouble (a la Bizarro and Henshaw). There are probably more instances than that.

S:TAS and "Smallville" notwithstanding, I've noticed there's been more than a few ideas that have been incorporated into the Post-COIE Superman mythology that people look at as new and revolutionary for the mythos, and in fact several of these had precedents during the Golden and Silver Age. Even the first Supergirl wasn't Superman's cousin, but rather an artificial being who ends up being sent to another dimension/reality/whatever by her creator...sound familiar?
 
Last edited:
I could go for an Intergang plot....Lois and Clark tried that couple times and it had mixed results
 
Anybody who thinks that they didn't want to make a sequel at that time are rewriting history. WB wanted a sequel and they wanted it fast tracked. Do they want a sequel now? Obviously not.

Things ultimately worked out for the better, wouldn't you say? We don't have to endure a continuation of Superman Returns, and hopefully, finally, the franchise will pull itself up by its bootstraps and restart like it should have a while ago. It'll take more time, but where's anyone going....the court case notwithstanding?
 
I think its a bad idea to start with Superman, costume and all, right of the bat but i wouldn't mind a pre-Superman Clark saving people in a War or something and being refered as an angel, red and blue blur hehehe Therefore, the action can still be escalated.

One of the problems with SR is that the best action sequence is the plane and the rest sucked.
 
It remains to be seen if it worked out "better". Depends on what happens with Superman next.
 
It remains to be seen if it worked out "better". Depends on what happens with Superman next.

How would continuing SR's storyline have been a positive, though? At the very least, you keep it to one generally forgettable showing, and finally moving on from the past.....instead of taking up even more valuable time and money spreading it out over two, possible three installments. Whatever reasons have virtually forced WB to reboot have got to be a positive for the franchise compared to what had resulted in SR, even if it means leaving it dormant for another 5-8 years or so. At the very least, they now have a concrete example of why they can't just depend on et familiarity of the brand and past merits, and why they need to step things up when/if they do get to another one.
 
I think its a bad idea to start with Superman, costume and all, right of the bat but i wouldn't mind a pre-Superman Clark saving people in a War or something and being refered as an angel, red and blue blur hehehe Therefore, the action can still be escalated.

why?? and the taint of Smallville should not touch this new film
 
Hopefully so man, we need to clearly show the next film is different and not set in the same setting as the past films. Bring the characters to more modern takes and more modern elements, better comic elements included and all that.



Exactly! That's why seeing villians we have never seen before onscreen in any live action Superman movie in the next Supes film is an absolute MUST!

Seeing LexCorp, Cat Grant, and Mercy would be good to see as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"