bullets
bang bang
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2005
- Messages
- 28,446
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I remember one of the Highlander sequels having pro wrestler Edge in it.
Only for a minute .. I think that was Endgame.
I remember one of the Highlander sequels having pro wrestler Edge in it.
What's even more important:
Who replaces Queen?
They could span the story over three films . We could have one central villian that he doesn't defeat until the end but in between they have to face other immortals. That's the only way to do it without tacking on convenient twists.
I've never watched TV series, and while there are tons of immortals, there can also only be one. If they do a straight remake, the story ends with Connor, as his is the story of The Gathering. Unless for every sequel you say, "Oh yeah, Connor and Kurgan weren't really the last Immortals, you forgot _______" at which point it would feel contrieved which is why I like my set up for a trilogy. Connor lived for over 500 years. No need to cram it into one movie.
There is a lot of truth in that. The reason a Highlander franchise has always failed is because as you said, the beginning of the franchise was also the end. Perhaps they can do something like this.
First movie - Set in Scotland it focuses on the early life of Connor, his battle which results in Kurgan stabbing him, his banishment from his clan, meeting and marrying Heather, meeting Rameriez, training under Rameriez, and it could ultimately end with the epic battle between Kurgan and Rameriez in which Kurgan kills Rameriez and rapes Heather. To fill the movie and add some action there could be flashbacks (like in the original movie) that shows Rameriez's backstory as well as Kurgan's and perhaps develops a rivalry between the two which would make their duel at the end more poignant (I believe some the supplemental material has already went down the road of developing a past between Kurgan and Rameriez).
Second movie - Opens with Heather's death of old age. From there it explores Connor's life leading up to The Gathering, spanning hundreds of years. The original Highlander implied that Connor knew several other Immortals, it could develop those relationships as well as have him trying to hunt down Kurgan for revenge. A good character arc for this wouldn't necessarily be a romance, but the father/daughter relationship between Connor and Rachel after he adopts her during WW2. It could be very poignant as he watches her grow old and ultimately die (since the third movie would be set in modern times, not the 80s, she'd either be very old or dead). HAving outlived his child, it would make the prize (mortality) be that much more effective.
Third movie - Would probably be the actual remake, it takes place in New York in the present for The Gathering. Leads up to and shows the final battle between Kurgan and Connor. Ends with Connor winning the prize of his mortality.
Princes of the Universe is an awesome song
I've never watched TV series, and while there are tons of immortals, there can also only be one. If they do a straight remake, the story ends with Connor, as his is the story of The Gathering. Unless for every sequel you say, "Oh yeah, Connor and Kurgan weren't really the last Immortals, you forgot _______" at which point it would feel contrieved which is why I like my set up for a trilogy. Connor lived for over 500 years. No need to cram it into one movie.
Nobody.Who replaces Queen?
I don't see how stretching the first Highlander film into 3 films makes it any better. The first film included everything in one film, and was all kinds of awesome. You don't always need to stretch things out like that just for the sake of having 3 films. Length and what is covered should depend upon the story in question, and I don't see how remaking Highlander is a good idea. A reboot with a different character or immortal? Perhaps can be good if you get real talent involved. A flat out remake...ugh.