TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,826
- Reaction score
- 15,073
- Points
- 103
What was merely implied with Riddick is nowhere near as bad as what James Bond gets away with on film.
What was merely implied with Riddick is nowhere near as bad as what James Bond gets away with on film.
That part did suck but it was necessary to propel the story. I just wish they'd have found a different way to do so.That part in Skyfall where the woman invites Bond onto the boat and he decides to spy on her and sneak into the shower was creepy as ****.
Anyway, Riddick was fun. It does rely a lot on Pitch Black.
And damn..
Why'd they have to kill the dog?
If Vin saves his money he could probably use all his bank from Fast sequels and Marvel sequels to finance all the Riddick films he wantsI generally don't like sequels that retread the original. Which is why Chronicles was refreshing in all it's epic pulpy industrial sci-fi glory. So my least favorite portion of this movie was the Pitch Black retread during the third act. But it was worth my money for the first 2 acts alone (Stranded Riddick, Riddick becoming the Jason Vorhees to the mercs' camp counselors). Especially Riddick Vs. Nature.
It's a shame this movie isn't making enough bank to warrant them getting the budget for that epic underverse movie they wanted to make. Riddick is the only Vin character I ever truly enjoyed and I rather see more movies for this than more F&F movies with Dom. Besides that concept of a mecca for the undead sounds really interesting. But I'll take a smaller scale return to Furya movie too. Better than getting nothing more at all.
That's why they should've scaled back on some of the shots where they're 'showing off' the CG. Also, the cinematography was awful.