Ridley Scott; Technology Is Killing The Cinema

jaguarr

Be Your Own Hero
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
43,566
Reaction score
1
Points
31
http://news.scotsman.com/entertainment.cfm?id=1399142007

Internet 'killing cinema', says director Scott

RAYMOND HAINEY
THE Hollywood director, Ridley Scott, warned yesterday that new technology is killing off the big-screen experience. The Oscar-winning County Durham-born movie mogul said mobile phones and computers threatened movie-making on an epic scale.
He insisted that the best way to experience great film was still in a cinema with a big screen and state-of-the art acoustics.

Scott launched the attack at the prestigious Venice Film Festival, where he unveiled a newly remastered version of his 1980s sci-fi classic Blade Runner.
He said: "People sit there watching a movie on a tiny screen. You can't beat it, you've got to join it and deal with it and also get competitive with it. But we try to do films which are in support of cinema, in a large room with good sound and a big picture."
However, Scott admitted: "I'm sure we're on a losing wicket, but we're fighting technology. While it has been wonderful in many aspects, it also has some big negative downsides."
Former Edinburgh Film Festival director Mark Cousins said Scott's prognosis was too gloomy. He pointed out that the death of the big screen had been predicted in the 1920s with the start of "talkies" and in the 1950s with the rise of TV. And he said that cinema attendances had begun to rise in the past five or six years after a long decline.
Mr Cousins said: "We still go to big cinemas at weekends collectively, but we also watch movies individually at home with our big TVs and sound systems."
He added that the message was more important than the medium. Mr Cousins said: "I take the view that content is king - it's the story and it's not what format it presented on. That has always been the case."
And he added: "There has been an increase in more specialist movie houses and the types of films which are doing well are documentaries, which never used to be the case, while animation is making a comeback."
But Mr Cousins said: "There is a sense of something big about to happen when people go to a cinema. At home, it's not as exciting as submitting yourself to something else and taking a risk, which is why going to the movies is still so exciting."
Scott is also the producer of the new Brad Pitt western, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, which was shown in Venice.
Scott said the Pitt film was "a wonderful, dramatic and historic piece", but added that films of that calibre were becoming rare in "dumbed-down" Hollywood. And he urged the industry to invest more in original work and stop relying on remakes of previous films to boost profits.
He said: "I'm not criticising Hollywood because I work there; I partly live there. But I'm saying this is the way it is, commerce is taking over art. Commerce has become the most important thing in the film industry."



So what do you guys think? Is Scott right? Personally, I feel the cinema industry has done more than it's fair share to kill itself. They overcharge for concessions at an astronomical rate ($.25 worth of soda for $7, $.15 worth of stale popcorn for $10), ticket prices are through the roof, sound systems are anything BUT state of the art in most theaters, I've seen countless films where the prints of different reels had major color variances or lines through them and many other reasons. Yes, it's much comfier to hang out in my house in a chair that wasn't designed for a five year old pygmy and watch movies on my big screen TV with surround sound. I don't have to listen to some jackass talk on his cell phone during the movie or get in a fight with some a-hole kicking my seat. I can have whatever I want to munch on during the film and I won't have to fill out loan liner papers to do it. And I don't have to even go anywhere or stand in line to enjoy the experience. My wife and I find ourselves only going to the theater for big event movies these days or for films we just can't wait to see, otherwise we're content to wait for them to come out on DVD and watch them at our leisure, for much less, without all the hassle.




jag
 
I agree w/ Scott to some extent . . . as a society, people keep drifting farther and farther apart . . . you see a room full of people that don't communicate with each other, but are incessantly 'texting' on their cell phones . . . and there's nothing like seeing a GOOD movie, where people are interacting w/ one another, complete strangers connected by a common experience . . .

but I also agree that cinemas have taken advantage of people by charging outrageous prices, and I like to personally smoke a nice joint before a funny movie :word: you can't do that at marcus cinemas :D

I do, however think that technology could help us to find a happy medium between home and theater-going, though . . . what w/ the advent of digital filming, sound and image quality are getting better and better . . . just lower the goddam prices already!!! $10 for a popcorn and sugar-water :rolleyes: GIMME A BREAK!
 
I still love to go to the theater, but if I can go rent it for $1.00 at the local Redbox several months later why bother? The reason I say why bother is because Best Buy or Samsung are not the ones killing the cinema, it is lack of quality product that is killing the cinema.
 
i don't think it's killing cinema...if anything the fact that bootlegs and earlier home video release dates are helping keep the momentum. it makes it harder for everyone to create something that people are willing to goto the theaters to see. the whole argument that Cinema is dying in the first place is so moot, imo. it's not as if Transformers had to struggle to make bank. the ART of cinema, however, is something that's definitely being hurt by technology. now we have no-talent hack directors that are taking advantage of technology...hence, more stupid movies.




no need to worry...if the climate crisis or 2012 doesn't end the world then we'll start to see more and more movies that are made specifically and ONLY for the theater.......stereoscopic 3d movies!
 
I don't eat or drink at the movies so I don't have to worry about being overcharged by the concessions. $9.25 ticket and I get my full theater experience. Nothing can replace it for me. The ooo's, ahhs, laughs and screams from the audience on cue...that's what watching movies are about.
 
Everyone makes valid points.

I wish the ushers would make rounds when they should or there was some way to contact them to get someone bounced out without me having to get the **** up and miss ****.
 
I agree. I think we've gotten a little overzealous with out technology.
 
If video killed the radio star, and the internet killed the movie star, then who's going to kill the internet? :eek:
 
I prefer to watch a new movie with a large crowd on a big screen. People that bootleg movies to watch silently on their computer screen...I can't get how that's fun.
 
That must be what you get when you tie a flashlight to your dick.
 
So what do you guys think? Is Scott right? Personally, I feel the cinema industry has done more than it's fair share to kill itself. They overcharge for concessions at an astronomical rate ($.25 worth of soda for $7, $.15 worth of stale popcorn for $10), ticket prices are through the roof, sound systems are anything BUT state of the art in most theaters, I've seen countless films where the prints of different reels had major color variances or lines through them and many other reasons. Yes, it's much comfier to hang out in my house in a chair that wasn't designed for a five year old pygmy and watch movies on my big screen TV with surround sound. I don't have to listen to some jackass talk on his cell phone during the movie or get in a fight with some a-hole kicking my seat. I can have whatever I want to munch on during the film and I won't have to fill out loan liner papers to do it. And I don't have to even go anywhere or stand in line to enjoy the experience. My wife and I find ourselves only going to the theater for big event movies these days or for films we just can't wait to see, otherwise we're content to wait for them to come out on DVD and watch them at our leisure, for much less, without all the hassle.




jag

i agree with jag's statement. the last few times i've been to the theater i've had to deal with idiots talking throughout the whole show, people kicking my seat and kids throwing **** everywhere. not only that, but the lines and high prices are ridiculous. i'll take the home experience, thanks.
 
I prefer to watch a new movie with a large crowd on a big screen. People that bootleg movies to watch silently on their computer screen...I can't get how that's fun.

I completely agree with you once again.
 
Poetic Chaos almost killed this thread.

-TNC
 
I thought from the thread title, it would be attacking effects and technology in regards to actual films causing a lack of directorial talent etc etc.
 
I thought from the thread title, it would be attacking effects and technology in regards to actual films causing a lack of directorial talent etc etc.
me too...

...if that article were about that then i would've agreed, but i think cinema is still going strong.
 
Technology isn't killing cinema. Ridley's brother Tony Scott is. :o
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"