MessiahDecoy123
Psychological Anarchist
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 25,558
- Reaction score
- 4,530
- Points
- 103
I don't think you can compare the two cases since they're so different. In Gifford's situation, the shooter shot wildly into the crowd and was then tackled by multiple bystanders while he was reloading and didn't put up much of a struggle once subdued. In Brown's case, he physically assaulted a solo officer, grabbed the officer's gun, and then charged the officer. You do any one of those things and the chance of getting shot goes up. Doing all three would make any officer feel threatened and a guarantee of non-lethal force is out the window.
The whole situation could have been prevented had Brown and his friend just walked on the sidewalk to begin with and Wilson would likely have just gone about his business. Wilson was going to go to lunch before seeing the two walking in the middle of the street. Wilson also thought that he'd just have a quick conversation about them moving over to the sidewalk but it turned into a very terse conversation, which led to it turning physical and ultimately deadly. To me, Brown is much more responsible for the situation turning sour than Wilson, based on his demeanor and actions once Wilson started talking to him.
Why wasn't an incident report filed soon after the shooting if Wilson's story is 100% honest?
Why is the small bruises on his right cheek when he was alledgedly attacked while sitting in the drivers seat?
Why would someone who was running away from an armed cop, charge an armed cop when over 35 feet away?
The only fact we know for sure is that Wilson's story has holes in it.
