Yea remakes are getting very pointless nowadays. But i am willing to give this remake a chance, we know very little on what they are doing so we cant go to crazy about it just yet.
Great film, haven't watched it in years...
Is that Brendan Gleeson in the beginning, the guy Robocop punches through the window(he's holding the mayor hostage).

I know what you mean. I think it looks great. It's got weight to it.- The movements that Weller does is awesome. 
What he saidJesus F. Christ... You seem like person who loves CGI. Go play in traffic!
I'm just kidding. But, in my opinion: The "80's stuff" is great... I don't think it's aged that much. Yea, it's got an 80's mindset... but it's still relevant. and the "silly TV spots"... ****. The GTA series are using the same stuff in their games! Only on the radio- And the effects... it's stop motion- and it was all they could afford. Tippet could have done it better if he had more time and money. I still think that the stop motion in this is better than in some of the CGI in movies we see today. And Robcop looks like a man in a suit...? Well he isI know what you mean. I think it looks great. It's got weight to it.- The movements that Weller does is awesome.
So I'm not a fan of remaking it... A sequel on the other hand. I'm all for it. Hell, I liked RoboCop 2- thought it was a lot of fun. Number three did't get made... You hear me! IT WASEN'T MADE!!![]()
I'm sick of your whinings:
"Noooo... Robocop must not be remade!"
"Boooo, remakes, boooooo..."
"There is only one Robocop, the Paul Verhoeven one"
Piss off!
Without remakes we wouldn't have so many movies...
BTW, Robocop can be remade because the first one is full of pessimistic 80s stuff, like Reagan's star wars, nuclear war danger, silly TV spots, unstoppable rise of crime. But more important are the SFX, so lame!
ED-209 is beautiful only when is still and Robocop looks like a man in a suit, instead of a cyborg (the only good looking part is his head without the helmet). And for last, the picture: I would like to see a Robocop movie shot in anamorphic.
So, I'm totally for remakes, even more than one.
I'm already awaiting a Transformers remake, a Superman one, Terminator and Aliens vs Predator (with Colonial Marines).

Agreed 100%Jesus F. Christ... You seem like person who loves CGI. Go play in traffic!
I'm just kidding. But, in my opinion: The "80's stuff" is great... I don't think it's aged that much. Yea, it's got an 80's mindset... but it's still relevant. and the "silly TV spots"... ****. The GTA series are using the same stuff in their games! Only on the radio- And the effects... it's stop motion- and it was all they could afford. Tippet could have done it better if he had more time and money. I still think that the stop motion in this is better than in some of the CGI in movies we see today. And Robcop looks like a man in a suit...? Well he isI know what you mean. I think it looks great. It's got weight to it.- The movements that Weller does is awesome.
So I'm not a fan of remaking it... A sequel on the other hand. I'm all for it. Hell, I liked RoboCop 2- thought it was a lot of fun. Number three did't get made... You hear me! IT WASEN'T MADE!!![]()
Shame on you!!Seriously color me shocked. I thought that every geek had watched RoboCop by now.
Glad to here you loved it.![]()
Cant believe you have only just seen it HR, its a movie that seems right up your alley as well, but yes, it is an amazing movie, and one that would only be ruined by a remake. I would much prefer to see Verhoeven's idea for a 4th movie about Robocop being re-activated in a far distant future after being de-activated for years come to fruition.
yeah somehow it was the only big action/sci fi movie of the 80's i never saw. 
REQUIEM FOR A ROBOCOP
* By Devin Faraci
* Published Today
* News
Is Aronofsky down with OCP?
Yeah, you know he.
Buried in a Hollywood Reporter article about Mary Parent is a stunner of a revelation: among the people who have been in to have meetings about the remake of Robocop is Darren Aronofsky (Russ briefly covered this here). I don't think this is just a throwaway name, either. I think Aronofsky is serious about this.
Which is amazing. It redefines the entire idea of a Robocop remake; all of a sudden this isn't just a cheap cash-in on a property that has nostalgia value but possibly an actual movie. This could be the next The Thing or The Fly with a real director on board, and Aronofsky is, 100%, a real director.
For him this would be a killer choice. I've read the script for The Wrestler, and it's good but very little. It's a movie that will get good notices but will probably not make a big impact (although it would be nice if I was wrong). He has The Fighter also lined up (could this be a trilogy? When will we see The Slapper?), but that may or may not happen, and it's a prestige picture. Aronofsky's always been ready to do a mainstream movie - his take on Batman would have been ****ing killer and made Nolan's look like Adam West on ecstasy - and the next year could be the right moment.
Just thinking about Aronofsky set free in a dystopian near future, with Robocop as his protagonist... I'm salivating. Let's keep our fingers crossed that all of a sudden the Robocop remake goes from a groaner to a potential classic.
t:.