KRYPTON INC.
Incorporated Kryptonian
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 85,991
- Reaction score
- 41,574
- Points
- 103
1. Critics love "bold" choices. Deconstructing a myth or characters is something that is getting a lot of praises.
2. The story in TLJ is decent enough to not hurt the movie enough from a critical standpoint.
3. The visuals, sound and music are amazing.
4. The acting is fine for the most part and outstanding for some.
5. The only thing to bring this movie down from a critical point of view is the pacing. But not enough to give it a score that would qualify it as rotten.
1,2 and 5 are the things some fans disliked. Thats were the discourse between some fans and the critics stem from.
On a further note for the US and some other english speaking countries. Critics like diverse casts and a political message. But that is for the most part very much limited to the US. It is something that does not get a lot of attention anywhere else.
Those are all rather... Vague.
Tell me WHY in your view is it wrong or incorrect to enjoy "bold" choices or at least the "bold" choices of TLJ, as you say the critics did?
Why is the story in TLJ in your opinion only "decent" and why did it only being decent translate into praise by the critics, or at least why was it's decency if you will, enough for the critics to recommend the film?
Again, why is the pacing so much more of an issue to the fans than the critics? I might remind you that not all the critics make a point of bringing up pacing issues, even when say, talking about the casino planet portion of the film as not being something seen as a plus?