The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Rotten Tomatoes score?

Rotten Tomatoes score?

  • 73% or lower what the first one got

  • 74%-79%

  • 80%-85%

  • 86%-90%

  • 91%-95%

  • 96%-100%

  • 73% or lower what the first one got

  • 74%-79%

  • 80%-85%

  • 86%-90%

  • 91%-95%

  • 96%-100%

  • 73% or lower what the first one got

  • 74%-79%

  • 80%-85%

  • 86%-90%

  • 91%-95%

  • 96%-100%

  • 73% or lower what the first one got

  • 74%-79%

  • 80%-85%

  • 86%-90%

  • 91%-95%

  • 96%-100%

  • 73% or lower what the first one got

  • 74%-79%

  • 80%-85%

  • 86%-90%

  • 91%-95%

  • 96%-100%


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Great to hear! I hate when RT only posts the negatives stinking WB owned site :p

OT: IF Gotg is a great film, I feel it will get great reviews because it is SOOOOOOOO different from almost any super hero film we've seen....at least at face value
 
Last edited:
It's going to be really interesting to see what the American critics think when they get a hold of the film.

I was pretty confident that the fun, lively tone was gonna earn it a pass from most... now I'm not so sure anymore. The script as a whole seems to have too many issues. I adjust my RT predictions from the 80s to the 70s. Most people seem to agree that it's at least a fun romp, even if not a particularly focused one.
 
while if this movie ends up dissopting me has much has i am starting to wore about then the cont down to the amazing spider man 3 is going to be very long has nothing will imprese me in till the movie comes out and gets great reviews. Has i was super inpressed by spider man 3 tralier and this tralier so even a great the amazing spider man 3 tralier all i am going to think of is it is going to be other dissopoetment.
 
I am shocked it is so low so early. American critics are much tougher on CBMs than ones in other countries, so if this keep up, 70s might not be possible.
 
I did actually use the number 57 in my post? Did you miss it? :cwink:

Yes there are more positive reviews in there, it is 57%, which both myself and RT consider to be rotten, you consider it mixed. Pretty simple stuff?

But how can you consider it rotten when the # of Rotten reviews hasn't exceeded the # of positive reviews?
 
But how can you consider it rotten when the # of Rotten reviews hasn't exceeded the # of positive reviews?

Would you agree it is subjective? Or are you saying that both myself and RT are not meeting the objective standard?

Not trying to prove myself right or wrong, I am trying to put across different, subjective points of view to indicate that there is no way it could possibly considered an objective outcome.

Feel like we are straying a bit too far off topic, if you want to continue to conversation, PM me
 
I find a lot of the reviews still seem to be talking about how unnecessary this series is which is unfair IMO it's not getting reviews as a film on it's own merits but rather being used to criticise the Hollywood trend of reboots and remakes.
 
I am shocked to i though this movie was going to be something special and be around a 90 and lowest like a 83 and now we may be headed to 60's heack even 50. We need like 10 or more good reviews in a row right now.
 
I am shocked it is so low so early. American critics are much tougher on CBMs than ones in other countries, so if this keep up, 70s might not be possible.

Very true. For example, Thor: the Dark World had great reviews from critics outside the U.S. However once it hit stateside, the RT rating sank.

Still, T:TDW has a decent audience rating and Spidey 2 might get a decent audience rating as well. Honestly, I personally weigh the Audience ratings over critics ratings anyway.
 
Would you agree it is subjective? Or are you saying that both myself and RT are not meeting the objective standard?

Not trying to prove myself right or wrong, I am trying to put across different, subjective points of view to indicate that there is no way it could possibly considered an objective outcome.

Feel like we are straying a bit too far off topic, if you want to continue to conversation, PM me

I agree that it is subjective, and that at the end of the day, only your opinion matters.

However, when it comes to RT's assigning of rotten and fresh ratings...it never made sense to me. Particularly, assigning rotten values despite a film having more positive reviews. If you ask me, rotten should be assigned when a film's rating hits less than 50%
 
I agree that it is subjective, and that at the end of the day, only your opinion matters.

However, when it comes to RT's assigning of rotten and fresh ratings...it never made sense to me. Particularly, assigning rotten values despite a film having more positive reviews. If you ask me, rotten should be assigned when a film's rating hits less than 50%

Maybe it's similar to the grading system most U.S. schools use. 50% would be an f.
 
Cap2 has 222 reviews. Do we expect ASM2 to have a lot more or about the same?
About the same. There's a long road ahead of us yet.

Also, remember that Captain America 1 started really low, and ended up in the 79%
 
Last edited:
24 fresh 9 rotten. Going to hit double digits way sooner than I had anticipated.
 
Very true. For example, Thor: the Dark World had great reviews from critics outside the U.S. However once it hit stateside, the RT rating sank.

i remember alot of good stuff said about thor: the dark world, i remember going in thinking this will be great because early feed back had been good

but now its 65% on RT

i actually thought it was pretty good, abit cheesy on the humour though
 
Very true. For example, Thor: the Dark World had great reviews from critics outside the U.S. However once it hit stateside, the RT rating sank.

Still, T:TDW has a decent audience rating and Spidey 2 might get a decent audience rating as well. Honestly, I personally weigh the Audience ratings over critics ratings anyway.

I do the same, especially with recent CBMs.
 
Very true. For example, Thor: the Dark World had great reviews from critics outside the U.S. However once it hit stateside, the RT rating sank.

Still, T:TDW has a decent audience rating and Spidey 2 might get a decent audience rating as well. Honestly, I personally weigh the Audience ratings over critics ratings anyway.

This is also true, and I am sure the audience rating will be higher. But, that can also be said for TASM1, also. I will be first to admit TASM isn't my favorite movie by any means, but I am hoping TASM2 blows me away, and was hoping that the critics reviews would indicate this, which is why I am fairly disappointed in the low score even prior to American reviews.

Of course I will be seeing it opening weekend and judge it for myself. But, this isn't that encouraging for us that thought the last one was good not great.
 
Having seen it, as much as I'd like this to be well received, I don't really care too much anymore. :)
 
71% :(
finally_found_this_in_colour_enjoy_oh_boy-79442.gif
 
Thing is there are loads of reviews out there that are positive but they aren't being posted add those reviews to RT and the score would be a lot higher than what it currently is
 
Thing is there are loads of reviews out there that are positive but they aren't being posted add those reviews to RT and the score would be a lot higher than what it currently is

but they aren´t, and that worries me :dry:
 
Thing is there are loads of reviews out there that are positive but they aren't being posted add those reviews to RT and the score would be a lot higher than what it currently is

Same can be said about any movie. Not all critics are RT critics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"