DarthSkywalker
🦉Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 132,485
- Reaction score
- 79,789
- Points
- 203
Oh, I am obtuse.Yes I like many things.

What does diversity mean to you? Is there a reason you don't want to answer that?
Oh, I am obtuse.Yes I like many things.
This thread has very much turned to the discussion of diversity and the meaning of it. It started on the first page. I am curious why you bring up it having many definitions to many people, but you seem to not want to share yours.The reason is solely cause this thread is not about what diversity means to me and I do not owe an answer to the question.
Does make you look like a drive-by troller in context though, Brutikus.
Wow, that wasn't an insult to the trans community at all.Does make you look like a drive-by troller in context though, Brutikus.
There's a pretty simple answer to it, too: diversity's great, there should be more of it, but a-woman-who-likes-to-wear-ladies'-clothes-playing-a-woman-who-wore-men's-clothes shouldn't be an issue any more than a straight actor playing a gay one or vice versa.
Dante "Tex" Gill was transgender.I was talking about crossdressers, which the movie seems to be about. If you can point to something where the real woman identified as a man in her personal life outside of the massage parlour, it'd be news to me.
Trans, crossdresser, it's not the same thing. LGBTQILOLBBQ, etc.
Dante Tex Gill, a transgender massage parlor owner whose portrayal by Scarlett Johansson in the upcoming film Rub & Tug has prompted a strong backlash, would be laughing his ass off at the debate, says Gills cousin, Barry Paris.
That wouldnt be as important as how he wanted the world to see him, Paris, a longtime film critic for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, told TheWrap on Thursday.
Paris said he didnt know for certain how Gill, who died in 2003 at the age of 72, would have reacted to Johansson or any actress playing him on film.
Id say its a toss-up, but I think its slightly more likely he would have liked to be played by a man because he identified as a man, Paris told TheWrap. Im sure he would have liked to have been played by a transgender man, but in his day that was very rare.
...
Paris has a charming way with words. A 2003 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette obituary quoted him describing Gill as personally gentle and non-violent while adding that Gill made a nice corrupt life for herself in a nice corrupt American society.
Paris only regret about that assessment is the use of the female pronoun. Most people were less enlightened about pronouns and LGBTQ issues in general 15 years ago, he explained.
Now, Paris said, there is no question Gill should be referred to as he.
The pronoun needs to be he and him rather than she and her, even though the newspapers refused to do it when he was alive, Paris said. He totally identified as a man from the time my cousins and I first knew him. He was always overtly masculine. He hated to be called she, and thats what the police always did, and the papers. It annoyed and upset him.
So what are the odds that this project quietly dissolves now that she's not attached? There's a reason the project had a big name attached in the first place.
So which is it jmc, is this a business or is this a charity?
Its different for one fundamental reason. Gay actors do get cast as straight characters, and vice versa. Rooney Mara is in Carol, Zachary Quinto is Spock, Neil Patrick Harris was the ultimate ladies man on television for years, etc. Its not the best for gay actors, but there is clearly a path. Trans actors do not get many, if any opportunities to play non-trans characters. If Hollywood start casting trans actors in non-trans roles, then it would be the same situation, and I don't think this argument happens. But as long as the only roles available to trans actors are playing trans characters, this will always be an issue. Especially with such few roles.I'm indifferent to this Scarjo thing.
How soon before every ''gay'' character must be played by a gay actor/actress tho? No more films like Moonlight or Brokeback Mountain, Blue is The Warmest Color etc. Bigger names get these stories told, but at the same time many marginalized actors don't even get the opportunity to even be in the same room to get a shot.
I like her mom hair.I sigh into a distance in time when Scarjo was that hot chick from Lost in Translation or at the very least, before she had that lame short hair cut.
Well the film industry just reflected society when Hollywood got going and it went along that way for decades before any remote changes were made.I think my issue with this, is they were apart of directing people to what to like. Does that make sense? Like they made things popular, a lot of the time by force. And by force I mean, just keep doing it and little to nothing else.
I don't think he ever has, off the top of my head I can't think of one, the Colour Purple?Steven Spielberg has had so much pull for decades now. How many female lead films has he made?
Arnie and Linda are returning for one last go around as well, I am mildly intrigued to see how it pans out.I feel like main character and main star are different. But yeah, not a major issue here. Arnie is definitely the major star of the terminator franchise.
Fair enough, to me when you deliberately shut out an entire section of people due to their gender though it's not so much course correction as repeating the actions that you were initially complaning about.I am not trying to be obtuse. Sorry man. I believe in affirmative action in such situation. Active course correcting centuries of the things that lead to it being this way in the first place.
Wonder Woman was so organic to me, it wasn't a case of just selecting Patty because she was a woman, she clearly had a take that brought her to the table, and I don't see Star Wars as having a lead as such, it's an ensemble overall, like Lord of the Rings.Also, I don't think it will be limited for all that long. Right now, this does feel like trying to ride the wave of Wonder Woman. Like they see, "well people seemed to like that, lets do that". Whether they learned the action lessons from Wonder Woman is another question. By yeah, IX is coming out next year, and it is JJ directing it.
I think it is more like, "the prequels aren't the most hated thing of all time anymore".![]()
I doubt they were but she should have something in place where she has to sign off on statments that are made on her behalf, it was a huge misstep.Yep. I don't care if those were her actual words, no way they should have been sent out by her people.
There is definitely a "circle jerk" nature to Oscar season, though I love and hate a lot of Oscar movies personally. But I do think in situations like this, "Oscar bait" can come off as a not great combination of pandering and self-congratulations, at the potential expense of a minority group.
I think she got it cut in preperation for the Hilary Clinton movie when she became President.........I like her mom hair.![]()