ChrisBaleBatman
Legendary Hero
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2005
- Messages
- 19,677
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
Well, supposedly the inital cut isn't 3 hours, but just under the mark at 2hrs and 51mins.
I agree. Kong did drag it out way to much... And NO, superman shouldn't be 3 hours long, that's just insane.. But I wouldn't mind if it was 2:30 hourFan of Tomorrow said:I don't get why people want it to be three hours or longer. Movies can be too long too, and if you measure the success or failure of a film strictly on its box office gross, it stands to do better with a shorter running time. As long as it's able to tell the story it's trying to tell in the time allotted, I'll be happy. King Kong for instance dragged on for me, and I can't believe there was a longer cut that PJ wanted to go with. Ugh. How many more silent, running scenes were there anyway? And as much as I enjoy the LotR films, I have a hard time watching the extended edition of RotK in one sitting.

Is this a guess of yours, or have you heard it some place?ChrisBaleBatman said:Well, supposedly the inital cut isn't 3 hours, but just under the mark at 2hrs and 51mins.
That seems like the sweet spot for me. Just like Batman Begins.ChrisBaleBatman said:Heard it on AOTS, Chris Gore said he knows 2 people who saw that really long cut of the film. He claims the film should come in at 2hrs and 15mins or 25mins.
ChrisBaleBatman said:I heard on ATOS that the running time should be between 2hrs 15min or 25min

ROBOCOP CPU001 said:I'm supprised, I mean the BBFC have seen the movie and have rated the movie..surly they would have a running time by now?
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:

Cinemaman said:Expect first reviews on 23-25th June.

Emerald Knight said:on rottentomatoes, right? That's usually the site to go to for reviews, so I'm told...I usually go to comingsoon.net. But maybe I should broaden my horizons for film reviews...![]()