Rush Hour 3

Rate the movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Plus his English improved noticably since that first film if you ask me.
not enough though... in the bloopers to this movie where hes saying different lines for the "its only 9.95$!" scene he clearly has no idea what hes saying...lol:oldrazz:
 
He said so in an interview for THE TUXEDO on CHUD.COM several years ago.

CHUD didn't start posting interviews until the fall of 2004, did they? Are you sure it wasn't some other site? I'm trying to find what he said back then. Maybe he's changed his tune since.
 
CHUD didn't start posting interviews until the fall of 2004, did they? Are you sure it wasn't some other site? I'm trying to find what he said back then. Maybe he's changed his tune since.
It was a junket where questions were asked and he answered them.

And I clearly remember an interview on the site with Stephen Sommers for VAN HELSING in May '04. So they've been posting interviews since before than.
 
It's a comedy, so nobody can tell you if it is good or not except for yourself.
It all depends on your sense of humor.
 
I enjoyed it. Just like I enjoyed the first two. Not very rewatchable, but very enjoyable while you are watching it.
 
I didn't find it that funny. It seemed to try too hard to be funny, but it fell flat for the most part.

Overall, very forgettable movie.
 
Let's get something straight. I don't hate the franchise as a whole. I mildly enjoy Rush Hour and Rush Hour 2. But let's be honest about something. These are NOT great movies. Or they are not 4 or 5 star movies. At best they are maybe 3 stars. I think parts of them are decent, somewhat fun action movies. But THIS movie was NOT worth waiting six years and all the money it took to make. And all it does is recycle lots of **** from the last two as well as showing a totally bored and pedestrian Chan phoning it in, and a totally one-note Chris Tucker.

It just makes total sense to me that Brett Ratner was the person Tom Rothman gave X-men 3 to. I thank the Deity that we at least got two X-men movies that Ratner had nothing to do with. When Rothman and Arad probably would've loved it even more if Ratner did all three.



1. Yes.
2. I didn't pay 9 bucks.
3. It's my job to see it.



It's ridiculous budget was a little cushioned by the overseas gross.

Rise of the Silver Surfer did not do that well. It totally disappointed and underperformed.

And my prediction is that it will make even less than that movie, unless the overseas gross is really fantastic, which I don't see happening.

My predictions are based directly upon what I've been reading on the movie from sources such as The Wall Street Journal. The costs for the movie are almost un-Godly, and it's not just the production budget.

Initially, I heard a paycheck around $25 million for Tucker as well. But hey, New Line gave it to him.


Wait a minute I agree that RH3 was no better the the 1&2 and it didnt worth the 6 years of wait but where I dont follow you is when you comparing an action comedy with serious action movie like ff4 and x-men???

And I m sorry for Mr Chan but he is not Tom cruise. RH it s all he s got! I mean is previous movies was terrible!!! I think drunken master was the best movies he did and it s was a long time ago. Chan is like 60 and he is far from the oscar so if I was him I ll kip doing some RH until I retire. :csad:
 
It was a junket where questions were asked and he answered them.

And I clearly remember an interview on the site with Stephen Sommers for VAN HELSING in May '04. So they've been posting interviews since before than.

Hey, I found the interview finally via the Internet Archive.

Here's the link. Coding isn't fully translated, but it's all readable.

He seems frustrated, but simultaneously apologetic about the fact that he didn't like the first two Rush Hour scripts when he read them. His main frustration seems to be that he A) doesn't understand why the dialogue is supposed to be funny because it's too American, and B) thinks his Hong Kong films are superior in regards to action and comedy, because of his "Chinese mind." He doesn't really seem to HATE the movies, although he does say that was his first reaction to reading the scripts. He just says he has no idea why they're funny. But then, Jackie is A) extremely rooted in Chinese culture and B) very physical comedy-oriented over dialogue. Which is probably why he got so frustrated with how much time was spent on dialogue versus the time spent on his action scenes in those movies.

Much like his critics, however, he seems to prefer the Shangai films. Damn, I really need to see those. Although he also hints at having the same problem on those movies. He basically feels that whatever Owen Wilson or Chris Tucker tells him is funny in America, he'll do, because he has no freakin' idea.

I also find it hilarious that he basically disses on The Tuxedo TWICE during the junket for that very movie! I can't really tell if he dislikes it or doesn't expect America to like it. Or maybe he's just generally pessimistic about his films. Truthfully, never saw that one either.
 
Hey, I found the interview finally via the Internet Archive.

Here's the link. Coding isn't fully translated, but it's all readable.

He seems frustrated, but simultaneously apologetic about the fact that he didn't like the first two Rush Hour scripts when he read them. His main frustration seems to be that he A) doesn't understand why the dialogue is supposed to be funny because it's too American, and B) thinks his Hong Kong films are superior in regards to action and comedy, because of his "Chinese mind." He doesn't really seem to HATE the movies, although he does say that was his first reaction to reading the scripts. He just says he has no idea why they're funny. But then, Jackie is A) extremely rooted in Chinese culture and B) very physical comedy-oriented over dialogue. Which is probably why he got so frustrated with how much time was spent on dialogue versus the time spent on his action scenes in those movies.

Much like his critics, however, he seems to prefer the Shangai films. Damn, I really need to see those. Although he also hints at having the same problem on those movies. He basically feels that whatever Owen Wilson or Chris Tucker tells him is funny in America, he'll do, because he has no freakin' idea.

I also find it hilarious that he basically disses on The Tuxedo TWICE during the junket for that very movie! I can't really tell if he dislikes it or doesn't expect America to like it. Or maybe he's just generally pessimistic about his films. Truthfully, never saw that one either.
LOL I'm the exact opposite I hate the Shanghai films LOL....and Tuxedo sux :o:o
 
Why is there no "0" option?

because no movie deserves a 0. much less a 1 or 2. comon...theres a difference between not liking a movie, and saying its worth nothing. no movie deserves a 0, 1, or 2...well...maybe a 2.
 
because no movie deserves a 0. much less a 1 or 2. comon...theres a difference between not liking a movie, and saying its worth nothing. no movie deserves a 0, 1, or 2...well...maybe a 2.



Battlefield Earth = 0
 
I gave it a 4. Nothing new was brought to the table.
 
Hey, I found the interview finally via the Internet Archive.

Here's the link. Coding isn't fully translated, but it's all readable.

He seems frustrated, but simultaneously apologetic about the fact that he didn't like the first two Rush Hour scripts when he read them. His main frustration seems to be that he A) doesn't understand why the dialogue is supposed to be funny because it's too American, and B) thinks his Hong Kong films are superior in regards to action and comedy, because of his "Chinese mind." He doesn't really seem to HATE the movies, although he does say that was his first reaction to reading the scripts. He just says he has no idea why they're funny. But then, Jackie is A) extremely rooted in Chinese culture and B) very physical comedy-oriented over dialogue. Which is probably why he got so frustrated with how much time was spent on dialogue versus the time spent on his action scenes in those movies.

Much like his critics, however, he seems to prefer the Shangai films. Damn, I really need to see those. Although he also hints at having the same problem on those movies. He basically feels that whatever Owen Wilson or Chris Tucker tells him is funny in America, he'll do, because he has no freakin' idea.

I also find it hilarious that he basically disses on The Tuxedo TWICE during the junket for that very movie! I can't really tell if he dislikes it or doesn't expect America to like it. Or maybe he's just generally pessimistic about his films. Truthfully, never saw that one either.
More than anything he hates the racist tinge of the dialogue he has to speak in the movies.

And this doesn't come from the article.
 
I live in Hollywood man. I've seen **** that would turn you white.
 
More than anything he hates the racist tinge of the dialogue he has to speak in the movies.

And this doesn't come from the article.
I lol'd like Jackie even knows what the hell the racist jokes mean.:woot::whatever:


Anyway I'm going to bed.
 
Saw it today, heh, I basically had the theater to myself. Thought it was an ok movie. As i've said before, I loved the other two Rush Hour movies. This one would be ranked second between all three. Tucker continues his comedic lines and the action from Chan was great. It's easliy a good action comedy movie.

I'll give it a 7/10
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"