The Chairman
Pimps' Main Prophet
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2005
- Messages
- 18,814
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
My main problem with Scientology isn't the fact that it's killed (certainly no more than any other religion, and certainly a lot less than the two major ones), but it really just confuses me that people followed it when it is by far the most easily disprovable and blatantly untrue of any world religion. Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism and Islam as well as many others have legititimate historical backing to them even if the more supernatural elements have yet to be proven.
Scientology, however, was based off a sci-fi novel (and from what I've heard, not a very good one) written I think in the mid-1950s', that became the basis for a religion. Not only that, but the owner admitted that it was essentially a Get Rich Quick scheme. I have no problem with Scientologists themselves (I love John Travolta movies, and I used to really love Cruise until he became the Pat Robertson of Scientology), but I just have a bit of a hard time understanding how people can willingly follow it despite the fact nothing behind it has any proof whatsoever (not proof of just the supernatural elements, mind you), and the fact that its owner essentially admitted it's fake.
Scientology, however, was based off a sci-fi novel (and from what I've heard, not a very good one) written I think in the mid-1950s', that became the basis for a religion. Not only that, but the owner admitted that it was essentially a Get Rich Quick scheme. I have no problem with Scientologists themselves (I love John Travolta movies, and I used to really love Cruise until he became the Pat Robertson of Scientology), but I just have a bit of a hard time understanding how people can willingly follow it despite the fact nothing behind it has any proof whatsoever (not proof of just the supernatural elements, mind you), and the fact that its owner essentially admitted it's fake.