CyclopsWasRight
Well, he was.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,815
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Silly question. If you don't want to watch it then don't, but no sense saying it shouldn't be made for those who are interested
No "we" would not. I in fact did not see the third film in theaters because of my distain for the sequel.We'd all go see another Matrix film, but I think they should simply let it be at this point.
no but I'd see it.
but what's left to tell?
One can interpret Matrix 2 and Matrix 3 as describing a Matrix within the Matrix but that isn't necessary and it's actually less intellectual than it's pretending to be. It adds a layer of complexity to the mythology without making it a better allegory, it actually makes it a lesser allegory. I go by the interpretation that the robots and zion are the real world, and that the Matrix has become unstable in spite of Neo and Smith, just like Capitalism can become unstable in the real world in spite of its stabilisers.
I Like Matrix 1 and Matrix 2, they're good action movies, they're very true to the late 1990s, and they deliver a good analogy about mature capitalism. The third one is a pure action movie pretending to discuss the merits of super-jesus, it was too long, it felt like a Peter Jackson movie.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the trilogy establish that Neo was just another anomaly who helped the Matrix system correct itself every so often.
Rendering the entire story of rebellion pointless.
Silly question. If you don't want to watch it then don't, but no sense saying it shouldn't be made for those who are interested
The Matrix is clearly a Marxist critique of capitalism, the speech that the architect gives qt the end of Matrix Reloaded is identical to the speech that theengineer gives at the end of Snowpiercer. The system is all, and revolutionaries are created to help purge the system of instabilities but sometimes they exceed expectations.Care to elaborate on your views regarding The Matrix and Capitalism? I've heard a lot of different takes about what this story alludes to but never capitalism. If you don't want to get into it here maybe send me a PM?
Also, you said the Matrix has become unstable in spite of Neo and Smith, but they were the cause of that instability.
I don't see how that makes rebellion pointless, because the people in Zion had no idea about that. The One returns to the Source, and chooses humans to be released to start a new Zion, as each time the One returns to the source, Zion is destroyed. (IIRC). So, these new humans that are released, know nothing of their fellow Zionists who were just massacred, just that there are more humans held against their will by the machines. So the rebellion starts again and again up until Neo.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the trilogy establish that Neo was just another anomaly who helped the Matrix system correct itself every so often.
Rendering the entire story of rebellion pointless.
Maybe the fourth film could expose Neo's experience in the sequels as an elaborate trick by the machines to lull Neo's comatose body (he was shot at the end of Matrix 1) back into a Matrix pod. In the fourth film Neo could be awakened again with no way to get to Zion. The rebels need Neo to find out what truly happened to Morpheus and the others since everything he thought he experienced was a lie.
Yes it would somewhat of a reboot but I think most people agree the sequels had wasted potential.
they killed most of the main characters including Neo himself.
That was never confirmed and left very ambiguous