Ash J. Williams
Hail to the king
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
- Messages
- 23,550
- Reaction score
- 1,835
- Points
- 103
No, they shouldn't ban guns.
I'm not saying that at all. There should be some form of gun control laws such as having the mandatory safety, or not allowing fellons have guns at all, and the waiting period is sensible too. And we should have tougher punishments on people who commit gun crimes. We should do more to promote gun safety programs.Spider-Bite said:that's a lie. How does not allowing felons to legally own a gun stop law abiding citizens from owning one?
Basing a stance? No. Using them as an example, yes. Since I don't know anyone in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, Miami, Phoenix, or other cities in US, why shouldn't I use the people I personally know in Memphis as an example of gun owners that actually practice gun safety and haven't had a gun accident?Calvin said:So instead of looking at actual gun accident statistics in the country, you're basing your stance on the people you personally know in Memphis? Wow, sound reasoning there. Like Spider-Bite said, stricter gun control doesn't prevent good law abiding and safe citizens from getting guns, it just goes towards limiting gun usage to said group.
Because we're talking about a national issue. And clearly, the numbers show that we could use a little better gun control. Not a banning, but gun control. If the people in your example are really as sound and safe as you say, they wouldn't have a problem even under stricter rules.Addendum said:Basing a stance? No. Using them as an example, yes. Since I don't know anyone in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, Miami, Phoenix, or other cities in US, why shouldn't I use the people I personally know in Memphis as an example of gun owners that actually practice gun safety and haven't had a gun accident?
I'm glad we have a background check as a standard, but considering we're issuing out killing machines, there really should be more tests before someone can buy a gun. Give me an IQ test, and a mental health test, and I'll be happy.Addendum said:A trigger lock is only good when the owner uses it. At one of my jobs I had in college, every gun I sold came with a trigger lock. Every gun sale had paperwork, including a background check done by TBI (Tennessee Bureau of Investigation).
With the idiots in Memphis, I agree. If you have to take a test to get a driver's license before you can legally drive, why shouldn't there be a test before one gets a firearm?Calvin said:I'm glad we have a background check as a standard, but considering we're issuing out killing machines, there really should be more tests before someone can buy a gun. Give me an IQ test, and a mental health test, and I'll be happy.
Spider-Bite said:I've met a few felons. They do not have the ability to buy firearms legally or illegally, because they don't know anybody that will sell them one, even though if they wanted drugs it'd be a peace of cake to get em.
The black market does not work the same for guns as it does for drugs, mainly because of the turnover rate for the product. you can only sell drugs to the same five people, and make a ton of money, because they keep coming back for more. Guns don't work like that because you dont finish smoking your gun in two days only to fien for more.
edit.. not to mention their probation officer or their parole officer can check their house at any time without notice, and send them to prison for 10 years. All felons have to be worried as well that somebody they know can rat on them. Imagine the trailor trash in a fight with his girlfriend. She lets the cop right in and tells them where it is.