First of all, I'd like to extend my most heartfelt gratitude for your input. They kinda reaffirm my belief that SHH Community is a lot more than hotties threads, 'I hate Bush' threads, 'James Bond is not a superhero' threads and 'Who/What is your favorite actor/food/movie/Presidential Candidate' threads.
Secondly, rest assured that while I seek life-changing advice from an internet message board dedicated to superheroes, movies and comics, I am fully aware that the final decision rests with me. So, even if the poll favours one decision, I am not dictated by it. The purpose of this thread is to get valuable input from you guys because there may be certain points that simply never crossed my mind. I'm not asking you to choose for me, just help me illuminate viewpoints which may have eluded me.
Now on to the meat of the matter.
I'm gonna start by saying that while I appreciate the suggestions that I should discuss this with my 5-year-old daughter, I think I need to highlight a pertinent point: she's 5 years old. Beyond the obviously biased 'Dad, I want you to spend time with me 24/7', I doubt that she can offer anything constructive. I don't think she'd be able to hold a wholesome discussion with me when the anticipation of 'Bear In The Big Blue House' being on the air in 5 minutes is overwhelming.
Moving on, Super_Ludacris raised a very good point, one which I've argued with one of you on AIM. They're offering me a partnership, heading a department. So, I'll still get to be my own boss, albeit in a larger setting of other 'own bosses'. It's not like I'm being offered the job of a Project Manager of the Trump Organisation of which, while the pay is astronomical, I'll still be an employee. In my instance, I am not being offered an employment with a fat paycheck here. I am being offered a partnership. My hours will still be my own. Although I admit to the possibility of spending less time with my daughter, but that would be due to the demands of work, not due to the demands of the senior partners. That being said, even at my current practice, I'd still have to work late if the work demands. If I have TONS of work, I'll have to go into overtime regardless of whether it's my own firm or in a partnership of another firm. Invariably, this new firm being a major player, there will be a lot of work. But by virtue of being a partner, I have the liberty to walk in and out of the office as I please, provided that I get the job done. Furthermore, I shall be heading a department, which means that I will be having my personal army at my behest. However, as to SL's point on having to share the liabilities in a partnership, I find that a very small plus-point. It's between having to bear a smaller liability all by myself or sharing a large liability with a few others. Mathematically, makes no difference.
I've been in the employment of a big firm before and I don't think I wanna go back there regardless of the pay. For the record, I've been a lawyer since 1998. 2002 was the year I started my own practice.
But it's never that easy, is it? Being a newly appointed partner in a law firm, I need to prove my worth. To prove my worth, I need to bring results. To bring results, I need to put in the hours - either by getting my hands dirty with work or by being out there golfing and dining with clients to attract more work. But definitely not by goofing off to the ice-skating rink with my daughter for an ice-cream cone.
Furthermore, if I decline, I'll get to build my own little empire. My daughter might be able to take over. However, this whole business of having to keep my own firm with my own name as a legacy - doesn't that sound a little bit egotistical to you? Putting aside the time-with-daughter argument, does this legacy thing really outweigh financial security?
Financial security. It's not like I don't have it now, anyway. But being a partner in a major firm guarantees better security. After all, they've been around for decades. I may be financially secure now, but what about in 5 years? I live in a modest condo and I drive in a nice car. Not too bad. But it would be nicer to be living in a grand house and driving a better car, wouldn't it?
Going back to time-with-daughter argument. Admittedly, I will have to make sacrifices there. Today I can go home early, goof off with the kid, have dinner then put her to bed. Ever so often, we'd spend the weekend taking a short vacation somewhere nearby. If I take the offer, I may not be able to go home as early, but I'll definitely be home before her bedtime (a personal promise of mine, even in my current practice). We may have to take lesser weekend vacations. But once I've earned it, I might be able to take 2 weeks off and take her to Disney World. So, as Eli has pointed out, I won't be sacrificing quality time (heck, I might even be able to enhance it), but I'll be sacrificing quantity.