Shut Down Craig Is Not Bond.com.

[TheVileOne]

Seriously. Their boycott effort failed. The site sucks and it just looks stupid.

The best thing they can do now is talk about how Happy Feet was #1.

Casino Royale is a hit at the BO. It's one of the best reviewed movies of all time and probably one of the best reviewed Bond films ever

Their site is nothing but trash and propaganda.

Someone kill it.

 

[xwolverine2]

i wish i had that power........

 

[DorkyFresh]

if only the world were that fair.

 

[David33]

Seriously. Their boycott effort failed. The site sucks and it just looks stupid.

The best thing they can do now is talk about how Happy Feet was #1.

Casino Royale is a hit at the BO. It's one of the best reviewed movies of all time and probably one of the best reviewed Bond films ever

Their site is nothing but trash and propaganda.

Someone kill it.

Agree .

 

[M.E.H.Z.E.B]

Contact the host, and get them jacked from the source.

 

[johnsonuk]

freedom of speach and all that.plus i think the site worked against them,every news reort mentioned it,maybe it got people curiouse

any way i would rather have them there *****ing than where i am

 

[TheVileOne]

It's not about freedom of speech.

It's that the site has no reason to exist. The site failed miserably. So the gig is up and it's time for the site to go into a hole and die.

 

[xwolverine2]

people have the right to be ******ed though........ look at all those KKK and nazi sites

 

[Darthphere]

Seriously. Their boycott effort failed. The site sucks and it just looks stupid.

The best thing they can do now is talk about how Happy Feet was #1.

Casino Royale is a hit at the BO. It's one of the best reviewed movies of all time and probably one of the best reviewed Bond films ever

Their site is nothing but trash and propaganda.

Someone kill it.

And you know these losers were the ones sitting there at 10 showings of CR looking for mistakes.

 

[TheCaretaker]

i agree the Craig haters 15 minutes of fame are up.

 

[TheVileOne]

The war is over. They lost. To the victors go the spoils. Now just go away morons.

 

[Thot]

Yes, Casino Royale has been doing well at the box office. How kind time will be to Craig and his "Bond" films is another matter entirely. The vitriol aimed at the anti-Craig website(s) is rather extreme, juvenile and overzealous to say the least. Get a grip. All you Craig lovers will now have to deal with all the controversial press your man is generating over his "gay Bond" comments. Bon Appetit!

 

[TheVileOne]

"Extreme, juvenile, and overzealous to say the least?"

That's the EPITOME of that PIECE OF TRASH HATE SITE.

He didn't make gay Bond comments either.

You call us Craig lovers like we are some kind of cult group. Wake the hell up.

 

[M.E.H.Z.E.B]

That web site has about as much relevance or weight as this thread over here. Both have served their purpose, and should now die like everything else on God's green earth.

 

[MKO1234]

For one, Thot, the whole thing about Craig wanting Bond to be bi was a hoax. However, lets suppose the comments really were made by a Bond actor, the final say goes through EON Productions, not the actor. I bet you didn't know that in an interview after The World is Not Enough was released, that Pierce Brosnan stated he would like to see the character of James Bond killed off (not out of hate for the character but because of the over-exhaustion of the storylines) and look what happened to that idea. Face it, you realize that Craig's performance is being hailed now and you cannot accept it so you revert to using lame "Bond going bi" tactics. Bottom line, you'll never see it unless someone makes another unofficial spoof movie.

 

[The Kid]

Just so you guys know, there are people in this world who don't care about bond at all.

I'm one of them.

 

[the gael]

well,
I hated the choice of craig as bond, and after viewing the movie ( which was pretty good ), i still hate the choice of craig. Not that the guy is a bad actor, but he is still wrong for the job. He hasn't the true bond physical appearence, from the book or from the previous movies. He looks still too old for the job of a 30 year bond and has as much class as sylvester stallone ( the final " my name is bond, james bond " scene is juste the most ridiculous in all the series... replace craig by bruce willis and you will still have the same " class " )
Craig played an excellent jack bauer, but jack bauer isn't bond !

As for the site, it was stupid from the beginning. There was so many valid critics about craig as bond ( see what I said previously ) more clever than all the crap they said about him.
I asked myself if the guys weren't payed by eon or sony to ridiculize the guys like me who didn't want craig as bond.

 

[johnsonuk]

It's not about freedom of speech.

It's that the site has no reason to exist. The site failed miserably. So the gig is up and it's time for the site to go into a hole and die.

of course it is freedom of speech.If they still think craig is not suitable then they have a right to say so.i would rather have them on that site *****ing about it than on the ones i use.

 

[Mr Jide]

CNB were ridiculously harsh and seeing as the site failed to achieve its primary objective, I'd rather they still be there just so the world can see how idiotic they look and how they've managed to achieve absoloutly nothing.

 

[kit1982]

Meh, it's their opinion. Honestly they aren't doing anything truely wrong, fair play to them for being bothered enough to create such a site and gain the status it did. Let's be honest the website didn't hurt the film at all, if anything it gave it extra publicity. These guys are passionate fans and have just as much right to express their opinion as we do.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

Meh, it's their opinion. Honestly they aren't doing anything truely wrong, fair play to them for being bothered enough to create such a site and gain the status it did. Let's be honest the website didn't hurt the film at all, if anything it gave it extra publicity. These guys are passionate fans and have just as much right to express their opinion as we do.

If anything they've been proven to be the ultimate trolls and went on a vicious campaign smearing Daniel Craig. It's okay to have a different opinion, but when it comes to actually smearing his name and his personal life, then that's another story.

Craig never did anything to have that kind of treatment thrown at him. He isn't Uwe Boll, Paul Anderson, or Pitoff.

 

[kit1982]

I'd hardly call it vicious, it was panto name calling and basically throwing everything but the kitchen sink in their bid to suggest that he wasn't right for the part. Now if they'd sent threats and the like maybe, but they were hardly smearing his name as not only did alot of their rants have little substance but also noone took them for anything more than a fanboy rant.

 

[TheVileOne]

It was vicious and disgusting. It's hate speech, slander, and libel. I don't think freedom of speech protects this kind of garbage.

And they KNOW Craig is a suitable Bond, but they are simply obsessed Brosnan fans carrying on a stupid little charade.

 

[Substance D]

What happened to Superfan? I'd love to know how he feels about the movie.

 

[Furious Styles]

It was vicious and disgusting. It's hate speech, slander, and libel. I don't think freedom of speech protects this kind of garbage.

Didn't you call Brosnan a giant pansy?