JokerNick said:Dear Simon and Zak
After viewing X3, I believe, as well as many other X-Men fans, that Fox should bring back Bryan Singer and his creative team, we think the films were in better hands with them, don't you agree?

Octoberist said:It's like not Simon's coming back there. I just think that, yeah they lied. He fed us crap. IF people are acting immature over there, all well. LIke wht I said before, Simon is living high off of his money right now. He doesn't have the time to check it out.
mattc said:Yeah, that isn't them, its marketing as pointed out above. And that may be misleading but it has happened with a great deal of movies.
Octoberist said:damn, of all of the comments, you had to pick mine. LOL.
It's nothing personal, Matt. I still haven't seen the movie, I haven't 'bashed' it nor praise it. This weekend, I'll see if I like or not.
If and when Simon comes back, it's a pretty ballsy move on his part.

Not really ..there is a grey area : i liked this movie.Wolverini said:The defination of the Phoenix is that she'll rise out of her own ashes. Its something that CAN NOT be destroyed. Easy as that.
She'll be back. This forum currently is being split in two. The Dark and Light Side...
adarling said:One thing i thought of just now too is how the hell did wolverine get from Westchester county all the way to the red woods outside san francisco, fight a battle, get the crap beat outta him, get back to the x-mansion to warn storm and then they all go and fight? He doesn't fly planes does he? Also, the daylight going to pitch black at night during the final battle wasn't very good either. I expect perfection on that part because it is so damn short...compare to lord of the rings or king kong or any of that nature because they didn't mess up that big or edit that crappy.
mattc said:Can I just ask when they were supposed to have lied? I am really tired of reading everwhere that they lied to us with no evidence that they did.
JustABill said:Don't bring your personal biased opinions on me.![]()
This was a intelligent and thought out movie, for you it wasn't because it didn't contain what you wanted it to contain!
This movie was not mad for you, nor for me, or anyone in specific, it was made for the mass, you just can't grasp that can you Nell?
Nibune said:The writers are getting PWNED by critics right now, which is i feel justified but a bit harsh
Aiden said:How, what was so bad about that script?
Aiden said:They really are. Do you think people realise these characters are fictional?
Retroman said:Hurling insults towards Kinberg and Penn will not help the situation.
LastSunrise1981 said:Okay, it's time to be the voice of reason here.
For a long time I was a bit disappointed in the role of Cyclops. For a long time we wondered why Cyclops was killed off, why Rogue took this, and why Angel has such a limited role. All of those are very valid questions and represent our particular feelings towards the source material, the writers, and of course, the film itself.
But we need to think realistically for a change. Who's to say Simon and Zakk didn't fight for Cyclops? Who's to say that they didn't see the popularity, the posts, and of course the overwhelming love for the Phoenis Saga? But yet, they still had to work within the parameters and did the best they could.
What fanboys/fangirls fail to understand is that the movie field is a business. This isn't New Line Cinema, LGF, or Sony where studios back off and allow you to make the movie of your dreams.
Dave Chappelle recently spoke on this matter. He said those who want to be writers or directors, be prepared to walk into a room full of suits who have NO IDEA what the material is about and be prepared for them to laugh at your ideas. If anything, you cannot blame Ratner, Simon, or Zakk anymore. It's time to focus the blame on the likes of Rothman and realize that it was he called for all of this.
It's easy for us to sit here and say "Oh Simon and Zakk SUCK! THIS MOVIE SUCKS! BRETT RATNER IS A STUDIO YES MAN!", when it's obvious none of you and this includes myself, knows what you would do in that situation and how you would get the movie finished.
I haven't seen the film yet. But I'm getting quite bored and annoyed of overzealous fanboys whining, crying, and bashing the writers and the directors for doing their job. If you can do so much better and feel you can make a better movie, then stop whining and actually get into the movie field so you can show the REAL directors how it's done.
KenK said:Exactly. Although Penn and Kinberg's credits are rather dubious. Yeah, Penn has a credit on X2, but I'll bet his input was minor compared to Singer, Hayter, Mike Dorhety and Dan Harris. I won't blame Ratner because I've seen him handle films with drama and character development and I think the situation here is just having no real time to work with the screenwriters. Singer was involved with the first X-Men from day one. He was there to do all the pre-production oversight, script approvals, everything. Ratner was just a victim of ass-backwards logic on FOX's part. Parts were being cast before Ratner was even brought in!
JokerNick said:I agree with you about the writters, there were given guidlines about the story, I guarentee they were told to keep the movie under 2 hours, kill of cylops and many other things, and I bet you after their first draft, the studio made them change things that they didn't like. I can though, blame Ratner, not about the story, but about the way the film is shot and about how Halle and Hugh really aren't trying, it's his responsibilty to get the most out of the actors........
