Snyder and Goyer explain Man of Steel.

Discussion in 'Man of Steel' started by blumatic, Jun 18, 2013.

  1. blumatic Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Senator Pleasury Registered

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes Received:
    0
    So they felt the needed to explain [BLACKOUT]why Superman does not kill[/BLACKOUT]??? How about because [BLACKOUT]like a normal compassionate rational being he just prefers life before death[/BLACKOUT]?
     
  3. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    I cannot help but laugh that he used Kobiyashi Maru as an example, as that situation actually states the opposite of what he did there.
     
  4. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    I found his explanation to be truly weird and rambling. That last sentence feels like something said by a 10 year old.
     
  5. pr0xyt0xin Shaper Savant

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,911
    Likes Received:
    641
    kobayashi maru is a no win scenario.
     
  6. godisawesome Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    3,985
    Likes Received:
    775
    Snyder seems to be embracing it as an action that will be brought up again and again throughout the series. And he's confirmed it's suicide by cop for Zod. I like that.

    And I also think its very interesting that Goyer and Snyder had to write the scene specifically to sell it to Nolan. It does show the three worked to improve each other, and that's a very symbiotic movie-making relationship.
     
  7. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    It is, but the whole point of that scene was Captain Kirk changed the programming because he didn't believe in no-win scenarios. He believed there was always a way.
     
  8. FlawlessVictory Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am fine with Superman killing Zod considering the circumstance. Synder's reasoning is dumb. Should have just said what Goyer did, that they were unsatisfied with Zod being sucked back into the Phantom Zone.
     
  9. pr0xyt0xin Shaper Savant

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,911
    Likes Received:
    641
    Superman broke/changed the rules to defeat Zod. It's an apt comparison.
     
  10. Hero 1 Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    21
    Yes, but that was written so Kirk could also be proven wrong, after all Star Trek 2 ended with Spock dying because of the no win scenario they were put in by Khan, forcing Kirk to face death and deal with its consequences.
     
  11. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    ......what?? That makes no sense.
     
    #11 Lighthouse, Jun 18, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2013
  12. blumatic Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its not weird. As we know Superman always battles to protect us. Some are easy some are very difficult. There may be a time where you kill.

    Here is a more simpler example.............You do something one way over and over and over the same way, no issues. One day you do it another way because you think it might be better....but once you do it you have some regrets by not doing the way you've done it before. You learned something.

    What if a MMA fighter had a terrific move that usually knocks out an opponent cold. But everytime its fine. One day he tweaks that technique for more effectiveness but ends up killing his opponent. Now there is a reason why he wont do it again.

    And Supes didnt do it in cold blood.
     
  13. blumatic Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    There reason's were similar. We know why Batman doesnt use guns. His parens were shot by them.

    Captain America uses a gun just fine. He was in the Army.
     
  14. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    You have a point, but I don't think he was proven wrong. Kirk has already faced death and it's consequences many times. If Kirk had actually made the decision to sacrifice Spock, I think you might be on to something, but I felt it was more about Kirk's attitude in all situations.
     
  15. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    I quite honestly do not understand how this even remotely compares to the situation in MOS.
     
  16. PunyGod Astronomer

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,431
    Likes Received:
    155
    ...
     
    #16 PunyGod, Jun 18, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2013
  17. psylockolussus Merry Mutant

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    47,363
    Likes Received:
    4,244
    Snyder is such a voice of reason.
     
  18. Hero 1 Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    21
    True, Spock did make the decision for him, probably knowing that Kirk would eventually either do it himself and wouldn't tell one of his officers to go kill themselves. But how long would he have waited until that happened? It was already a slim escape when Spock did it, and the end result would have been everyone died in the Genesis explosion. Kirk's hesitation to make the chioce almost resulted in more people dying because he wouldn't make the call.

    It's telling that by the time of TNG there's a specific test that command track officers need to take before they can pass; it involves ordering one under your command to save the ship but die in the process: http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Bridge_Officer%27s_Test
     
  19. Senator Pleasury Registered

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes Received:
    0
    No problem there. But I thought it would have been better if, in any movie Superman is forced to kill, Superman has this non-killing policy in advance so we know the conflict inside him. I thought it was absurd to say Superman needed to kill first to learn that he doesn't want to kill. Anyone feels like they had to kill in order to decide not doing it again?

    I don't think killing could fit in any category under the name "one thing done one way" or "a different way to do" something.
     
  20. FlawlessVictory Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did it take Batman having to use a gun to know he shouldn't use one? The problem is making Superman kill to learn he shouldn't want to kill again. Snyder's reasoning makes no sense. And I'm fine with Superman killing in that situation.
     
  21. blumatic Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    My point is whether now in MOS or in his long career of fighting evil doers a killing may happen by Superman's hands. Once that death or killing happens it will affect him. A killing may occur how it happend to Zod 20 years from now.

    Superman may have a thought in his head one day in his long career, that he needs to kill this fool before it gets bad. He does it and then regrets it.

    Next time he may want to use diplomacy or have a plan next time he is in a tough spot again.
     
  22. blumatic Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess your right.
     
  23. Lighthouse Fairness, Equality, Bacon

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    That's pure speculation that is not anywhere evident in the film. It's clear till the very end that he does not want to kill Zod, but is forced to. To somehow say "That's why he doesn't kill" is not only ridiculous, but also proves the opposite. It shows that were Superman in this situation again, he would do the same thing. If that's what Snyder wants, fine, but it's the complete opposite of his reasoning.
     
  24. Hero 1 Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    21
    I'd imagine that if they ever use Doosmday, this will be the reason Superman hesitates and doesn't kill him sooner than he really should, resulting in more collateral damage. I always wondered why that fight in the comics went on for so long, despite the writing being on the wall about midway through it.
     
  25. blumatic Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    0
    No not the film but during his career. But Im moonwalking on defendin Zack here.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"