So...Is brosnan's Bond dead?

BlackKnight1 said:
Ok, sorry guys but I have not seen a good explination of the M thing, except just ignore it. Yep typical there.

A friend of mine have talked about this, and came up with a good idea in my opinion.
Yes there have been multiple Bonds, but none of the Bonds realize this, they where taken in and brainwashed to believe they are Bond. This explains why M is still the same even though you should have a male M in Casino Royale.
I am sure you will all attack me for this idea, but I challenge you to explain why it is a bad one instead of just saying "it sucks".

you and ur friend are ******s. sorry to say.
 
what about the villians? Blofeld was in three bond movies with 2 diff. bonds how does he not know that that its not the same guy if its a codename?

Actor: Donald Pleasence
Movie: You Only Live Twice staring Sean Connery

Actor: Telly Savalas
Movie: On Her Majesty's Secret Service staring George Lazenby

Actor: Charles Gray
Movie: Diamonds Are Forever staring Sean Connery

so i hope this proves it to the people that think its a codename, that they are wrong and need to watch the bond movies.
 
Batarang said:
Nah, don't like that idea at all...



Never seen the xXx's movies.....so did Vin Diesel's character apparently get killed off, and Ice Cube take over with the xXx code name?

yes and ice cube was way better
 
I think it's ambiguous enough where you can assume whichever you want- there's times where comments suggest always 1 Bond (new q watch- this is your 20th, I believe), and times that suggest the opposite (george lazenby's "this never happenned to the other guy")... and now, from what the teaser has shown us (00's have a short lifespan, Bond getting promoted but still the same M), it suggests that maybe it could be a codename.

To each their own, I think it's ambiguous enough.
 
Drago said:
I think it's ambiguous enough where you can assume whichever you want- there's times where comments suggest always 1 Bond (new q watch- this is your 20th, I believe), and times that suggest the opposite (george lazenby's "this never happenned to the other guy")... and now, from what the teaser has shown us (00's have a short lifespan, Bond getting promoted but still the same M), it suggests that maybe it could be a codename.

To each their own, I think it's ambiguous enough.
Youretard.jpg
 
Lazenby's "this never happened to the other guy," line was simply "breaking the 4th wall." It was just pretty stupid, nothing else to it really.
 
Furious Styles said:
Lazenby's "this never happened to the other guy," line was simply "breaking the 4th wall." It was just pretty stupid, nothing else to it really.
Lazenby wasn't that good of a bond anyways.
 
I wouldn't mind the multiple James Bond 007 theory as stated in that "Final Assignment" fan fiction story. I think that's what it was called. It would fit more in line with Judi Dench's return as M. As if that doesn't screw things up enough.

I actually had a weird dream about Casino Royale and Pierce Brosnan was in it. Brosnan was 007 until he was savagely murdered by some unknown enemy and diced up into small parts. Craig was the new agent assigned to investigate his murder. He found what happened to Brosnan and got pissed, ready to take revenge. Then I woke up, lol.

Yes I am prepared for the "wtf u dream of this????, u ******ed" comments.
 
Drago said:
I think it's ambiguous enough where you can assume whichever you want- there's times where comments suggest always 1 Bond (new q watch- this is your 20th, I believe), and times that suggest the opposite (george lazenby's "this never happenned to the other guy")... and now, from what the teaser has shown us (00's have a short lifespan, Bond getting promoted but still the same M), it suggests that maybe it could be a codename.

To each their own, I think it's ambiguous enough.

Lazenby talking about "the other fella" was just breaking the fourth wall, that was a stupid mistake in an otherwise great movie. Why would they have the same psychology if they were different characters? Why would they be all widowers? Are Leiter and Moneypenny also codenames? There is no ambiguity. Some continuity mistakes, but no ambiguity.
 
HR-PUFF&STUFF said:
Lazenby wasn't that good of a bond anyways.



Lazenby was a good bond..if he continued as orignally planned nobody would be saying lazenby was bad, his last bond would have been octopussy.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
Lazenby was a good bond..if he continued as orignally planned nobody would be saying lazenby was bad, his last bond would have been octopussy.
no the one after his movie was dimonds are forever, and then it was live and let die.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
no.always hated that idea that bond is a code name..this isn't xXx.

It was even stupid in THAT sequel, too.
 
As far as I'm concerned, Connery, Lazenby, and Moore's Bond share the same continuity. The same moneypenny, m, and Q all prove this, as well as lazenby's dest being filled with items from connery's past movies, and moore having a dead wife just like lazenby.

Dalton and Brosnan have their own seperate histories.
 
The Batman said:
Dalton and Brosnan have their own seperate histories.

But Dalton also has a dead wife the same as Moore. Licence to Kill, the scene where Bond leaves the reception - Felix mentions her.

Not to mention the fact that Dalton shares an M with Moore, and both Dalton and Brosnan share a Q with... everyone else.
 
Bishop2 said:
But Dalton also has a dead wife the same as Moore. Licence to Kill, the scene where Bond leaves the reception - Felix mentions her.

Not to mention the fact that Dalton shares an M with Moore, and both Dalton and Brosnan share a Q with... everyone else.


I know...

I'm just saying that, Connery/Lazenby/Moore are the same exact bond, IMO. Their movies arent put into a vague history. I see Moore as being an older version of Bond after he fights spectre, etc. In this era of Bond, he fights in the heart of the cold war, from the 60's-mid eighties.

Dalton and Brosnan are the ones who have a vague history. All they have are the basics of Bond, Q, and the dead wife. They fought in the cold war era from the 70's till the end of it, basically.
 
I am curious to know if the "wife" factor is in any of the books? I can remember when first hearing about CR movie and it would explain why Bond is the way he is with the ladies. I always thought he is like that because his wife was killed.
 
Connery is earth 1 bond
Lazenby is earth 2 bond
Moore is earth 3 bond
Dalton is earth 4 bond
Brosnan is earth 5 bond

Craig is post crisis bond
 
You know, I just checked out this board and I am dismayed, absolutely disgusted in fact, about the sheer viciousness that many members of the forum display because someone challenges their 'set in stone' idea about a character they didn't create, by the suggestion of anothers idea. Ok you don't like it, just say that and move on- there's no need to be disrepectful. I don't know why you are so damn uptight anyway, at the end of the day- BOND IS NOT REAL. You are not defending anyone, or backing up someone in a fight so get a grip on reality and remember what it is that you are being so fasecious for.
No the codename theory is not a good one, but if thats how you interpret it, then cool, you do that. THERE'S NO HARM IN THAT.
Now please people, some of you really need to grow up, I would suggest you do so. This is a forum for a 40 year old franchise, lets treat it with some dignity.
 
SpeedballLives said:
in the trailer, Bond says 00's have a short life expectancy.
I think it would be cool if Brosnan's Bond WAS dead, and M is welcoming the NEW Bond, so James Bond would be a code name like in the original Casino Royale film.
I'm sure most people are gonna say it's stupid, but i would enjoy it.

yup, it's stupid.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,277
Messages
22,078,893
Members
45,879
Latest member
vrlex
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"