Southern Flag Opinion.

Should the USA Get rid of the Southern Flag?

  • Yes.

  • No.

  • Maybe.

  • This question doesn't match wtf you posted in your post.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Flying the Confederate flag, or just flying any flag with negative ties?

Cause if it's the Confederate Flag, then it's been during and since the Civil War.
 
Pft. I'm just going to make my own flag. The United States of Spider-Man. If you don't like Spider-Man you're a ****ing traitor and should be webbed up and BURNED. :cmad:
 
So because it CAN represent something, we should do away with it?

It's a symbol. as such, it's basically a symbol of whatever you want it to be. The flag has clearly come to represent the broad idea of Southern Pride. Which is pretty damn vague, people. It could mean a certain kind of beliefs, pride in one's culture, community, what have you.

Are a lot of racist, bigoted, and ignorant people running around with this flag? Sure. Is everyone who displays it racist or ignorant? Not so much.

Look at actions and context, not just the symbol that is being used.

I'm told they teach the Civil War a bit "differently" in the South, which has always interested me.

The Civil War was about slavery as much as Iraq was about liberting the people there. It was a bargaining chip. However, slavery was a HUGE issue during the Civil War era, before and after.

That said...it's a free country. People have rights to their beliefs. If someone wants to wave a flag that says they believe in this or that, or if they wave a well known symbol that is misinterpreted, then they also have to deal with the consequences and repurcussions if that's not a mainstream ideal in some areas.

Would you support changing the Maine state flag to have a swastika on it as a symbol of peace?
 
You know what the south has also brought us? Michael Vick.

I want you all to think about that.
 
If Southerners wanted to select a symbol to represent their pride they should've chosen a flag that wasn't offensive to so many people who live there (i.e. black people) because it was so strongly identified with the horrible evil of slavery.

I really can't understand why state institutions would fly a flag that carries with it associations of slavery and treason. Does anyone know when this practice started?

I don't know where to begin with that. You act like it was a political motion to have the flag represent slavery. That's not the case at all.

First, "strongly identified with the horrible evil of slavery" on its own, as a symbol, is reaching a bit. It requires you to read quite a bit into the flag itself, and ignore the fact that obviously, not everyone who flies the flag shares these beliefs.

Second, and along the same lines, the flag itself only became synonymous with bigotry when it was used by bigots, and that is not an accurate representation of all people who fly this flag. Asking to have that symbol removed because some groups have used it for something negative, and the rest of the world is too stupid to think in context...it's like asking if we should stop doing ANYTHING because some people pervert it. That's just beyond ridiculous to me.

Third, the Confederacy and slavery will always, always, always be linked historically the same way the Nazis and the Holocaust were to Germany.

You want to get rid of anything that reminds of slavery, I suggest starting by getting rid of the South altogether.

To look at the flag and be reminded of slavery? So? Again, that's something the South will always have to deal with. Regardless of the flag they fly, or the names they have for their towns, or the food they serve at picnics. Just like Germany will always have to deal with its association with the Nazi party.

Would you support changing the Maine state flag to have a swastika on it as a symbol of peace?

A swastika?

Maybe. Depends on the visuals, and why it's there.

Now, the Nazi party emblem itself? Of course not.

But the Nazi emblem is not neccessarily what the average "peace swastika" looked like, historically speaking.

Also, the swastika has very little to do with Maine itself. If Maine suddenly decided to adop a "swastika", I'd kind of be like "Is Maine more peaceful than the rest of the world or something?"

To look at this conferadte flag itself and say "Wow. That means "slavery and racism and evil" and nothing else" is absurd to me.

Again. This flag means many things to many people, just like ANY symbol does.
 
I say abolish flags entirely and replace them with state birds.
 
I have no problem having respect and admiration for southern heritage - but there is a whole library of other confederate flags that weren't used as banners of racism after the civil war. If one cares more about respecting the confederation than making a racial statement - common sense dictates you use one of them.

It's like trying to act innocent for using a swatzstika because it wasn't initially a symbol of evil.
 
A swastika?

Maybe. Depends on the visuals, and why it's there.

Now, the Nazi party emblem itself? Of course not.

But the Nazi emblem is not neccessarily what the average "peace swastika" looked like, historically speaking.

Also, the swastika has very little to do with Maine itself. If Maine suddenly decided to adop a "swastika", I'd kind of be like "Is Maine more peaceful than the rest of the world or something?"

To look at this conferadte flag itself and say "Wow. That means "slavery and racism and evil" and nothing else" is absurd to me.

Again. This flag means many things to many people, just like ANY symbol does.

They decided to use it because of the (imaginary) historically high Buddhist population because it is part of Maine's heritage.
 
Come to Maine, we have lobsters, Stephen King and Buddhists!
 
Yeah, cause he used to live there. But I coulda swore his next book coming out is about Florida, since he lives there now I think.
 
To look at this Confederate flag itself and say "Wow. That means "slavery and racism and evil" and nothing else" is absurd to me.

See this is what I was talking about. How can you say it's absurd when quite frankly the flag has been linked to violent hate groups MUCH longer that it had been used as a symbol of the confederacy.

The Civil War only lasted 4 years while the KKK (which was founded by ex confederate soldiers) has been waving that flag and spreading hate and violence for well over 100 years!! That flag has been present at public lynchings, cross burnings, and segregation rallies pretty regularly. It's completely understandable why a certain group will see it as symbol of hate when people who hate and want to kill them wave the damn thing around all the time...The KKK has been terrorizing blacks in the south for generations and proudly displaying that flag while they do it.
 
You know, to be fair: The KKK uses the current American flag a lot, too. =/

EDIT: Forgot to put it in context. They use the current one a lot, but still use the old Confederate flag a lot more.
 
Last edited:
You know, to be fair: The KKK uses the current American flag a lot, too. =/

EDIT: Forgot to put it in context. They use the current one a lot, but still use the old Confederate flag a lot more.

This is true, but the American flag doesn't invoke the same images as the confederate flag does. The Civil War was about economics and state rights but slavery WAS a big part of it as the free labor was a big part of southern and border states economy. The Decedents of slaves can draw SOME positive imagery from the US flag (and even that is a very recent thing) but there's nothing to draw from the image of the confederate flag but slavery, murder, and oppression. As I said hate groups have REALLY gone out of their way to make that flag synonymous with being anti black.
 
They decided to use it because of the (imaginary) historically high Buddhist population because it is part of Maine's heritage.

In that instance? Thousands and THOUSANDS of years in the future? Sure, why not. As long as it was tasteful, and did not resemble the nazi emblem directly.

I say abolish flags entirely and replace them with state birds.
Hell yes. We could chain the state birds to the tops of flagpoles.

I have no problem having respect and admiration for southern heritage - but there is a whole library of other confederate flags that weren't used as banners of racism after the civil war. If one cares more about respecting the confederation than making a racial statement - common sense dictates you use one of them.
Again.
That's not ALL this flag has stood for.
Just because a racist uses one does not make the flag itself a horrible thing.
Actions VS symbols, people.

It's like trying to act innocent for using a swatzstika because it wasn't initially a symbol of evil.
Here's the thing.

If you are not committing evil actions, and you do not intend for your use of the swastika symbol to be seen as connected to the Nazi party, you have every right to act innocent.
 
I have no problem having respect and admiration for southern heritage - but there is a whole library of other confederate flags that weren't used as banners of racism after the civil war. If one cares more about respecting the confederation than making a racial statement - common sense dictates you use one of them.

It's like trying to act innocent for using a swatzstika because it wasn't initially a symbol of evil.
Yes. This. I agree.
 
I have no problem having respect and admiration for southern heritage - but there is a whole library of other confederate flags that weren't used as banners of racism after the civil war. If one cares more about respecting the confederation than making a racial statement - common sense dictates you use one of them.

It's like trying to act innocent for using a swatzstika because it wasn't initially a symbol of evil.

And as I said before the idea that it's about southern heritage is relatively new and flawed. Blacks live in the south too and the ones that do live there typically have no pride or positive feelings about that flag.
 
In that instance? Thousands and THOUSANDS of years in the future? Sure, why not. As long as it was tasteful, and did not resemble the nazi emblem directly.

No. Not thousand. Just a little over 100 years.

Also who the hell quantifies "tasteful". In many people's opinion the confederate flag is not tasteful.

Here's the thing.

If you are not committing evil actions, and you do not intend for your use of the swastika symbol to be seen as connected to the Nazi party, you have every right to act innocent.

No you do not. You have every reason to expect that you will get unwelcomed "flak" for using a symbol that most popularly represents something evil.
 
So now the flag MUST mean "slavery, murder and oppression"? Just because it's occassionally been used by people with those beliefs and actions?

See this is what I was talking about. How can you say it's absurd when quite frankly the flag has been linked to violent hate groups MUCH longer that it had been used as a symbol of the confederacy.

Because it's absurd to suggest that simply because a portion of the population uses it as such that this is the only meaning it can have. That's just a silly, illogical way to approach things.

The Civil War only lasted 4 years while the KKK (which was founded by ex confederate soldiers) has been waving that flag and spreading hate and violence for well over 100 years!! That flag has been present at public lynchings, cross burnings, and segregation rallies pretty regularly. It's completely understandable why a certain group will see it as symbol of hate when people who hate and want to kill them wave the damn thing around all the time...The KKK has been terrorizing blacks in the south for generations and proudly displaying that flag while they do it.

But again.

The flag is used by others than just the KKK, bigots, and other ignorant, misguided, or hate filled people. These other people do not use it to showcase bigotry, racism, and hatred, but as a symbol of their culture.

Do a few bad apples spoil an entire barrel?

No.

By the way, these groups also use OTHER elements of life and society, like bedsheets, robes, the color white, red, etc. Should we demonize those things too, simply because some ignorant, bigoted idiots use them in doing wrong?

You brought up burning crosses. Should we stop using the symbol of a cross because some idiots burn them?

Should we stop using ropes and tying knots because some people used them to lynch?

Should I stop listening to certain country songs because a KKK member might play it at their rally?

It strikes me as ignorant to suggest that because evil people use something every so often, that the symbol itself, which was never intended to be evil, is now evil, and must be seen as such.

You want to get into the nazi swastika nonsense, go ahead, I've had this argument before.

It's all about context, people. It's always been about context.

That said. I understand that some people may see these things and only remember the negative elements of them. If a certain group sees something as a symbol of hate or intolerance, fine. I understand that. I understand that people who look at the flag can get certain stereotypes in mind.

Do you know how I got over thinking "NAZIS!" everytime someone said "Germany?" I learned more about Germany, so that that wasn't one of my only points of reference. Point being, the associations one has with the a symbol or idea, and how much they dwell on those things, is kind of on them. Recognizing that a symbol has ties with something does not make these stereotypes you're all going on and on about an all encompassing social truth.

Heck, very often, the words "The South" will bring certain stereotypes to mind. It's absolutely SILLY to suggest that this flag is the cause of all that, or that all those ideas and memories would disappear if the flag did.

Again. The South will ALWAYS have to deal with the memories of slavery, intolerance, bigotry, etc.

Finally: Hate, bigotry, and intolerance are not illegal. It is an American's right to have and express their beliefs, whatever they may be. That means Americans are free to fly a flag, worship Satan, hate blacks, whatever they want to believe. They are also free to be proud of their state's history, even if that history has some sordid elements.
 
Last edited:
No. Not thousand. Just a little over 100 years.

Whenever. If it was overall appropriate, I'd say it could be considered. I don't know that this would be an appropriate state image due to its religious nature, and frankly, to show a religous image like that...that might be a no no to a lot of people. Dunno.

Also who the hell quantifies "tasteful". In many people's opinion the confederate flag is not tasteful.

I used "tasteful" in a sentence, and directly tied it to not looking like the nazi emblem. Do the math.

No you do not. You have every reason to expect that you will get unwelcomed "flak" for using a symbol that most popularly represents something evil.

I see. So you're guilty of what, exactly, by acting innocent about using a worldwide symbol, as long as you're not using it to say "I believe in what the Nazis did"?

Why would you be unable to act innocent?
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"