spideyguy16
My name is.
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,704
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Why did he slip my mind... Lol!
Of course without a doubt gobby.
Of course without a doubt gobby.
I think Green Goblin was awesome in the first Spider-Man Movie Game. The aerial fight against him was great and we could ride his glider along with him while punching him. And even though he had the movie costume, he felt just like 616 Goblin.
I want the goblin to be as appealing as the joker is to whe world. Make gobby awesome and people will like him
He had his awesome 616 personality, I credit that game for being the first source to adapt comic books Norman Osborn properly as the d*** he isI think Green Goblin was awesome in the first Spider-Man Movie Game. The aerial fight against him was great and we could ride his glider along with him while punching him. And even though he had the movie costume, he felt just like 616 Goblin.
It isn't. It's just speculation.http://www.warpzoned.com/?p=2641 here's a website that is talking about The Amazing Spider-man game, but I'm not sure as to if it's legit or not.
Agreed, except for the part about Spider-Man 3. The psp version was my first spidey game and I've been hooked on spidey games ever since.I can't wait for the Amazing Spider-Man game, Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 were great games. 3 was about the same as the movie...
An underrated good game based on an underrated good movieI can't wait for the Amazing Spider-Man game, Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 were great games. 3 was about the same as the movie...
really fun and underratedThe only thing I liked about Spider-man 3 was the graphics(xbox360) other than that, yeahh it was the same as the movie..
Spider-Man 2 swinging mechanics are the best, I agree, and it has the most varied side questsSpider-man 2 was my favourite of the 3 movie games. The swinging mechanics were by far the best and there was just so much to do. Great fun.
It suffered because it's the exact same thing as Spider-Man 2, only with the symbiote, more combat moves (some less acrobatic, some just as acrobatic), missions with some points having more than one way to solve the area, different pole swing and web attacks (seriously improved), less variety in side quests, they did for it what they weren't able to do for Spider-Man 2, nothing annoying to do to play story mission, choose stages instead of being stuck precise linearity (said in a trailer and on back of the box, kinda), etc etcWrong. Spider-Man 3's swinging mechanics were the best of any Spider-Man game out there. Spider-Man 3 suffered because of it's repetitive side missions.
No, I am not wrong. That is my opinion, and that's yours.Wrong. Spider-Man 3's swinging mechanics were the best of any Spider-Man game out there. Spider-Man 3 suffered because of it's repetitive side missions.
t:He's not wrong. It's his opinion and I agree with him. SM2's swinging mechanics are the best so far, specially when it is upgraded to its maximum potential.Wrong. Spider-Man 3's swinging mechanics were the best of any Spider-Man game out there. Spider-Man 3 suffered because of it's repetitive side missions.
It's not underrated. When fans and most critics agree that it's not what it should have been and that it has more wrongs than rights, that's something to listen.An underrated good game based on an underrated good movie
It's terribly underrated, poorly criticized at itIt's not underrated. When fans and most critics agree that it's not what it should have been and that it has more wrongs than rights, that's something to listen.
Dude, get over it. You're constantly trying to justify this game. You're going to find many people who dislike this game and you'll grown tired defending it so let go. The hatred towards it is proving why it isn't underrated. It is rated accordingly cause if so many people dislike the game, then they certainly did something wrong with it.It's terribly underrated, poorly criticized at it
- No main menu: Why is it they only complain about this game? Spider-Man 2 had no main menu on the start screen, main menu inside the pause menu
- Combat sucks: Really, what sucks about it? It has plenty of moves Spider-Man did
- Repetitive: Like every other game is? It's the least repetitive of all the Spider-Man titles, free roam has more variation in street missions in SM2, but this one has more variations than that in most stuff
- PS1 game: It's a huge step up
- Graphics are lame: It was early in the days of PS3, and Activision weren't graphics masterminds, other than the hair, the eyes of most people, everything looks fine, and three interiors look like they were made by an amateur using 3D max, the rest look really good
- Camera sucks: Yeah, some copies have some issue with camera a little more than the rest, but it's the same camera issue with most games I played, even Arkham Asylum and Assassin's Creed have it, it's not like there's more of it here. Camera is fine
- Framerate: You guys complain framerates are slow or fast? Cause when they're fast they're as fast as that abomnation I want to forget released the year that followed, some has steady and good framerates
- You depend on reflexes too much: Amateurs
- Repetitive and uninspired boss battles: Spider-Man vs Harry is one of the best fights ever in a video game, it happened before inFAMOUS. How uninspired are these boss fights? Repeating there pattern? It's easy to get over, and it isn't like it's different
- Kingpin: Use rage mode against him, no speacials
- All these QTE's: They are in 20/42 missions, and you're not forced to expect a difference, get over it
- Story sucks or incoherent: It has a real decent story, it has some flaws, but not terrible. And about it not connecting, if they say it in two main areas that shouldn't be a source of complaint
- Designs suck: I watched youtube videos before purchasing, thought the game is disgusting because of the way they treated Scoprion, guess what happened when I played his missions, they're my favorite
- Repetitive (Again?): I finished the game 30 times, some cause I want to feel what people complain about, some to experiment with it, and it has the player use some imagination to find some stuff. Carlyle missions 1 & 2 have the character being point specific, most other missions have plenty of freedom to them
- Voice acting sucks: Aside from some of the Chinese guys sounding cheesy, voice acting is the best here among all the movie Spidey games, especially Spider-Man, he lived the role in SM2, seemed to enjoy it in SM3
- 3rd free roam game in a row, nothing new: It changed a lot, SM2 plays different from USM, SM3 is different from both, no need to do side quests to unlock story missions is a plus, swimming is a plus, slingshot is a plus, holding camera is a plus
- All those gang missions: 11/42, take a big portion, so? Arkham Asylum is a legendary game, and everywhere you go there it's the same thing, thugs to hit in order to gain access to the next area, even in boss battles there are cronies to fight, it's toooooooo repetitive, no one seemed to complain about that, so what's wrong in having story centered missions about street gangs? Nothing wrong in that, it's an improvement to most games
So here is the list of all the useless over the top complaints Spider-Man 3 received, I got it after completing almost everything in the game 30 times, and watching all those horrible video reviews of people who don't know how to play, of people who enjoy more repetitive games and call this repetitive, and all those terribly unfair reviews. My verdict: Terribly underrated game, most underrated game ever, and one of the best Spider-Man games, last great Spider-Man game released so far
FoF is for kiddies, and has a real good story, so I excuse it
WoS is terrible, so terrible it can be fun
SD is the same $#%^ with four Spider-Men, nothing to praise