Arachnerd
The White Portuguese
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2010
- Messages
- 19,885
- Reaction score
- 15,718
- Points
- 103
There are only three things about the film that I am on the fence about, as I loved it otherwise.
1) The lack of a direct Uncle Ben reference. I totally understand the argument that they wanted to avoid mentioning him due to how much he was emphasized in the previous films (and since the TASM franchise was criticized for being too similar to what had just come before, it is clear that making a unique Spider-Man film was a top priority). However, I still think a more clear, direct reference would have been appreciated. I feel like there are enough hints in both this film and Civil War that the origin and motivation are unchanged, and Ben's presence and impact on Peter can be inferred in several places (the scene with May after the Ferry, his "interrogation" of Aaron Davis, his refusal to accept Toomes' truce) but I still really think the sequel needs to establish what exactly happened there.
As someone who used to be very underwhelmed by that decision, the thought occurred to me that they might get to Uncle Ben in future movies. His character and his philosophy are still an important part of Peter's character and I don't think they'll forsake them in the films to come. At least, that's what I hope.
Heck, the way Homecoming ended, you have an obvious way for Ben to be brought up when
May and Peter have the talk about him being Spider-Man, either in Infinity War or Homecoming 2.