UltimateJustin
The Hype's Black Purist
- Joined
- May 11, 2005
- Messages
- 1,982
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Would you want Spiderman 4 to have a scene where Peter Parker attends a political speech, but then has to leave because he gets hungry?
This thread sounded like a good idea but if the thread starter is going to approach this in such a *****e-like way I propose that this thread be...
CLOSED
But...that's not the point of the thread. Quite the opposite, actually.
LOL! Sorry, I thought it said what "you" want to see. t:But...that's not the point of the thread. Quite the opposite, actually.
LOL! Sorry, I thought it said what "you" want to see. t:
Well, then you're okay. It's generally an uneducated/lower class way of softening the blow by not using the actual word.Never heard the slang myself.
I'd rather see the villain die if it made sense like the original GG or even NG. I didnt think killing off villains would bother this franchise cause Spider does have about five good ones, but if when they killed Venom it was like "hey, we dont have anything else for you in this movie to do you.. you exploded." It would have been better if Harry dies, Marko goes on and Eddie goes to jail in the end (assuming that they had to have it with Sandman getting away scott free). I think that would have represented Eddie as the Peter who made the wrong choices and having to deal with the consequences better than having him just die after fifteen minutes of running around as Venom.i don't want to see another dead villain or another being let go scott free...
Most Least Wanted Scene - Peter Crying.
No more Peter crying, dancing, or unmasking himself. Who in NY doesn't know hes spiderman at this point?